Abstract
An experiment was conducted to contrast the motor performance of three groups (N = 20) of participants: (1) patients with confirmed Parkinson Disease (PD) diagnose; (2) age-matched controls; (3) young adults. The task consisted of scribbling freely for 10 s within circular frames of different sizes. Comparison among groups focused on the relation between the figural elements of the trace (overall size and trace length) and the velocity of the drawing movements. Results were analysed within the framework of previous work on normal individuals showing that instantaneous velocity of drawing movements depends jointly on trace curvature (Two-thirds Power Law) and trace extent (Isochrony principle). The motor behaviour of PD patients exhibited all classical symptoms of the disease (reduced average velocity, reduced fluency, micrographia). At a coarse level of analysis both isochrony and the dependence of velocity on curvature, which are supposed to reflect cortical mechanisms, were spared in PD patients. Instead, significant differences with respects to the control groups emerged from an in-depth analysis of the velocity control suggesting that patients did not scale average velocity as effectively as controls. We factored out velocity control by distinguishing the influence of the broad context in which movement is planned—i.e. the size of the limiting frames—from the influence of the local context—i.e. the linear extent of the unit of motor action being executed. The balance between the two factors was found to be distinctively different in PD patients and controls. This difference is discussed in the light of current theorizing on the role of cortical and sub-cortical mechanisms in the aetiology of PD. We argue that the results are congruent with the notion that cortical mechanisms are responsible for generating a parametric template of the desired movement and the BG specify the actual spatio-temporal parameters through a multiplicative gain factor acting on both size and velocity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
24 April 2024
In this article, the family name of the author Catalano Chiuvé , Sabina was incorrect. This has been corrected.
References
Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Hening W, Sage J, Poizner H (2001) The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 104:1027–1041
Ashe J (1997) Force and the motor cortex. Behav Brain Res 87:255–269
Baldissera F, di Loreto S, Florio T, Scarnati E (1994) Short-latency excitation of hindlimb motoneurons induced by electrical stimulation of the pontomesencephalic tegmentum in the rat. Neurosci Lett 169:13–16
Benecke R, Rothwell JC, Dick JPR, Day BL, Marsden CD (1986) Performance of simultaneous movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 109:739–757
Benecke R, Rothwell JC, Dick J, Day BL, Marsden CD (1987) Simple and complex movements off and on treatment in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:296–303
Berardelli A, Dick JPR, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Marsden CD (1986a) Scaling of the size of the first agonist EMG burst during rapid wrist movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:1273–1279
Berardelli A, Accornero N, Argenta M, Meco G, Manfredi M (1986b) Fast complex arm movements in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:1146–1149
Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Hallett M (2001) Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 124:2131–2146
Bloxham CA, Mindel TA, Frith CD (1984) Initiation and execution of predictable and unpredictable movements in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 107:371–384
Bock O, Eckmiller R (1986) Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: evidence for amplitude rather than position control. Exp Brain Res 62:451–458
Bock O, Arnold K (1992) Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets. Exp Brain Res 90:209–216
Braak H, Rüb U, Sandmann-Keil D, Gai WP, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH et al (2000) Parkinson’s disease: affection of brain stem nuclei controlling premotor and motor neurons of the somatomotor system. Acta Neuropathol 99:489–495
Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E (2003) Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 24:197–211
Brotchie PR, Iansek R, Horne MK (1991) Motor function of the globus pallidus. 1. Neuronal discharge and parameters of movement. Brain 114:1667–1683
Brown JS, Knauft EB, Rosenbaum G (1948) The accuracy of positioning reactions as a function of their direction and extent. Am J Psychol 61:167–182
Brown RG, Jahanshahi M (1998) An unusual enhancement of motor performance during bimanual movement in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64:813–816
Cardebat D, Doyon B, Puel M, Goulet P, Joanette Y (1990) Formal and semantic lexical evocation in normal subjects. Performance and dynamics of production as a function of sex, age and educational level (Article in French). Acta Neurol Belg 90:207–217
Castiello U, Bennett KMB (1997) The bilateral reach-to-grasp movement of Parkinson’s disease subjects. Brain 120:593–604
Day BL, Dick JP, Marsden CD (1984) Patients with Parkinson’s disease can employ a predictive motor strategy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:1299–1306
Delwaide PJ, Pepin JL, de Pasqua V, Maertens de Noordhout A (2000) Projections from basal ganglia to tegmentum: a subcortical route for explaining the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease signs? J Neurol (suppl 2)II:75–81
Demirci M, Grill S, McShane L, Hallett M (1997) A mismatch between kinaesthetic and visual perception in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 41:781–788
Desmurget M, Vindras P, Gréa H, Viviani P, Grafton ST (2000) Proprioception does not quickly drift during visual occlusion. Exp Brain Res 134:363–377
Desmurget M, Grafton ST, Vindras P, Gréa H, Turner RS (2003) Basal Ganglia network mediates the control of movement amplitude. Exp Brain Res 153:197–209
Desmurget M, Gaveau V, Vindras P, Turner RS, Broussolle E, Thobois S (2004a) On-line motor control in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 127:1754–1773
Desmurget M, Grafton ST, Vindras P, Gréa H, Turner RS (2004b) The basal ganglia network mediates the planning of movement amplitude. Eur J Neurosci 19:2871–2880
Desmurget M, Turner RS (2008) Testing basal ganglia motor functions through reversible inactivations in the posterior internal globus pallidus. J Neurophysiol 99:1057–1076
Draper IT, Johns RS (1964) The disordered movement in parkinsonism and the effect of drug treatment. Bull Hosp J Hopkins 115:465–480
Evarts EV, Teräväinen H, Calne DB (1981) Reaction times in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 104:167–186
Favilla M, Gordon J, Hening W, Ghez C (1990) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VII Independent setting of amplitude and direction in response preparation. Exp Brain Res 79:530–538
Flash T, Inzelberg R, Schechtman E, Korczyn AD (1992) Kinematic analysis of upper limb trajectories in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 118:215–226
Flowers KA (1975) Ballistic and corrective movements on an aiming task. Neurology 25:413–421
Flowers KA (1976) Visual ‘closed-loop’ and ‘open-loop’ characteristics of voluntary movement in patients with parkisonism and intention tremor. Brain 99:269–310
Flowers KA (1978a) Some frequency response characteristics of Parkinsonism on pursuit tracking. Brain 101:19–34
Flowers KA (1978b) Lack of prediction in the motor behavior of Parkinsonism. Brain 101:35–52
Freeman FN (1914) Experimental analysis of the writing movement. Psychol Rev 17:1–46
Fu QG, Flament D, Coltz JD, Ebner TJ (1995) Temporal encoding of movement kinematics in discharge of primate primary motor and premotor neurons. J Neurophysiol 73:836–854
Fu QG, Suarez JI, Ebner TJ (1993) Neuronal specification of direction and distance during reaching movements in the superior precentral premotor area and primary motor cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol 70:2097–2116
Georgiou N, Iansek R, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG, Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JA (1993) An evaluation of the role of internal cues in the pathogenesis of parkinsonian hypokinesia. Brain 116:1575–1587
Georgopoulos AP, Caminiti R, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1983a) Spatial coding of movement: a hypothesis concerning the coding of movement direction by motor cortical populations. Exp Brain Res Suppl 7:327–336
Georgopoulos AP, DeLong MR, Crutcher MD (1983b) Relations between parameters of step-tracking movements and single cells discharge in the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus of the behaving monkey. J Neurosci 3:1586–1598
Georgopoulos AP (1990) Neurophysiology of reaching. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 227–263
Ghilardi MF, Alberoni M, Rossi M, Franceschi M, Mariani C, Fazio F (2000) Visual feedback have differential effects on reaching movements in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer disease. Brain Res 876:112–123
Glickstein M, Stein J (1991) Paradoxical movement in Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci 14:480–482
Godaux E, Koulischer D, Jacquy J (1992) Parkinsonian bradykinesia is due to depression in the rate of rise of muscle activity. Ann Neurol 31:93–100
Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1994a) Accuracy of planar reaching movements: 1. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99:97–111
Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C (1994b) Accuracy of planar reaching movements: 2. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res 99:112–130
Hallett M, Khoshbin S (1980) A physiological mechanism of bradykinesia. Brain 103:301–314
Hallett M, Shahani BT, Young RR (1977) Analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements at the elbow in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:1129–1135
Harrington DL, Haaland KY (1991) Sequencing in Parkinson’s disease: abnormalities in programming and controlling movement. Brain 114:99–115
Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17:427–442
Houk JC, Wise SP (1995) Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: their role in planning and controlling action. Cereb Cortex 2:95–110
Inase M, Buford JA, Anderson ME (1996) Changes in the control of arm position, movement, and thalamic discharge during local inactivation in the globus pallidus of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 75:1087–1104
Jahanshahi M, Brown RG, Marsden CD (1992) Simple and choice reaction time and the use of advance information for motor preparation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 115:539–564
Johnson MTV, Kipnis AN, Lee MC, Loewenson RB, Ebner TJ (1991) Modulation of the stretch reflex during volitional sinusoidal tracking in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 114:443–460
Kendall MG, Stuart A (1968) The advanced theory of statistics. Griffin, London
Kurata K (1993) Premotor cortex activity of monkey: set- and movement-related activity reflecting amplitude and direction of wrist movements. J Neurophysiol 9:187–200
Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo CA, Viviani P (1983) The law relating kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychol 54:115–130
Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo CA, Viviani P (1984) Global metric properties and preparatory processes in drawing movements. In: Kornblum S, Requin J (eds) Preparatory states and processes. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 357–370
Majsak MJ, Kaminski TR, Gentile AM, Flanagan JR (1998) The reaching movement of patients with Parkinson’s disease under self-determined maximal speed and visually cued conditions. Brain 121:755–766
Marsden CD (1982) The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia: the Robert Wartenberg lecture. Neurology 32:514–539
Mazzoni P, Hristova A, Krakauer JW (2007) Why don’t we move faster? Parkinson’s disease, movement vigor, and implicit motivation. J Neurosci 27:7105–7116
McLennan JE, Nakano K, Tyler HR, Schwab RS (1972) Micrographia in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 15:141–152
Meunier S, Pol S, Houeto JL, Vidailhet M (2000) Abnormal reciprocal inhibition between antagonist muscles in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 123:1017–1026
Michel F (1971) Experimental study of the graphic gesture (Article in French). Neuropsychologia 9:1–13
Mink JW (1996) The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog Neurobiol 50:381–425
Mink JW, Thach WT (1991a) Basal ganglia motor control: I. Nonexclusive relation of pallidal discharge to five movement modes. J Neurophysiol 65:273–300
Mink JW, Thach WT (1991b) Basal ganglia motor control: II. Late pallidal timing relative to movement onset and inconsistent pallidal coding of movement parameters. J Neurophysiol 65:301–329
Mink JW, Thach WT (1993) Basal ganglia motor control: III. Pallidal ablation: normal reaction time, muscle cocontraction, and slow movement. J Neurophysiol 65:330–351
Moore AP (1987) Impaired sensorimotor integration in parkinsonism and dyskinesia: a role for corollary discharges? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:544–552
Moore AP (1989) Vibration-induced illusions of movement are normal in Parkinson’s disease: implications for the mechanism of the movement disorders. In: Crossman AR, Sambrook MA (eds) Neural mechanisms in disorders of movement. John Libbey, London, pp 307–311
Moran DW, Schwartz AB (1999) Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. J Neurophysiol 82:2676–2692
Morris ME, Huxham F, McGinley J, Dodd K, Iansek R (2001) The biomechanics and motor control of gait in Parkinson disease. Clin Biomech 16:459–470
Morris ME, Iansek R, Matyas TA, Summers JJ (1994) The pathogenesis of gait hypokinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 117:1169–1181
Munro-Davies LE, Winter J, Aziz TZ, Stein JF (1999) The role of the pedunculopontine region in basal-ganglia mechanisms of akinesia. Exp Brain Res 129:511–517
Ostry DJ, Cooke JD, Munhall KG (1987) Velocity curves of human arm and speech movements. Exp Brain Res 68:37–46
Pahapill PA, Lozano AS (2000) The pedunculopontine nucleus and Parkinson’s disease. Brain 123:1767–1783
Papoulis A (1965) Probability, random variables and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York
Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Brasil-Neto JP, Cohen LG, Hallett M (1994) Akinesia in Parkinson’s disease. I. Shortening of simple reaction time with focal, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 44:884–891
Pellizzer G (1997) Transformation of the intended direction of movement during motor trajectories. Neuroreport 8:3447–3452
Pfann KD, Buchman AS, Comella CL, Corcos DM (2001) Control of movement distance in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 16:1048–1065
Pine ZM, Krakauer JW, Gordon J, Ghez C (1996) Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport 7:2357–2361
Riehle A, Requin J (1989) Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 61:534–549
Schneider JS, Diamond SG, Markham CH (1987) Parkinson’s disease: sensory and motor problems in arms and hands. Neurology 37:951–956
Schnider A, Gutbrod K, Hess CW (1995) Motion imagery in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 118:485–493
Schwab RS, Chafetz ME, Walker S (1954) Control of two simultaneous voluntary motor acts in normals and parkinsonism. Arch Neurol 72:591–598
Schwartz AB, Georgopoulos AP (1987) Relations between the amplitude of 2-dimensional arm movements and single cell discharge in primate motor cortex (Abstract). Abstr Soc Neurosci 13:244
Schwartz AB (1992) Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: single-unit activity during sinusoid tracing. J Neurophysiol 68:528–541
Schwartz AB (1994) Direct cortical representation of drawing. Science 265:540–542
Schwartz AB, Moran DW (2000) Arm trajectory and representation of movement processing in motor cortical activity. Eur J Neurosci 12:1851–1856
Sheridan MR, Flowers KA, Hurrell J (1987) Programming and execution of movement in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 110:1247–1271
Simonetta-Moreau M, Meunier S, Vidailhet M, Pol S, Galitzky M, Rascol O (2002) Transmission of group II heteronymous pathways is enhanced in rigid lower limb of de novo patients with Parkinson’s disease 125: 2125–2133
Stebbins GT, Goetz CG (1998) Factor structure of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale: motor examination scale. Mov Dis 13:633–636
Teasdale N, Phillips JG, Stelmach GE (1990) Temporal movement control in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:862–868
Turner RS, Anderson ME (1997) Pallidal discharge related to the kinematics of reaching movements in two dimensions. J Neurophysiol 77:1051–1074
Turner RS, Grafton ST, Votaw JR, DeLong MR, Hoffman JM (1998) Motor subcircuits mediating the control of movement velocity: a PET study. J Neurophysiol 80:2162–2176
Van Gemmert AWA, Teulings H-L, Contrrras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE (1999) Parkinson’s disease and the control of size and speed in handwriting. Neuropsychologia 37:685–694
Van Gemmert AWA, Adler CH, Stelmach GE (2003) Parkinson’s disease patients undershoot target size in handwriting and similar tasks. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1502–1508
Vindras P, Viviani P (1998) Frames of reference and control parameters in visuo-manual pointing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:569–591
Vindras P, Viviani P (2002) Altering the visuomotor gain: evidence that motor plans deal with vector quantities. Exp Brain Res 147:280–295
Vingerhoets FJ, Schulzer M, Calne DB, Snow BJ (1997) Which clinical sign of Parkinson’s disease best reflects the nigrostriatal lesion? Ann Neurol 41:58–64
Vinter A, Gras P (1998) Spatial features of angular drawing movements in Parkinson’s disease patients. Acta Psychol 100:177–193
Viviani P, Terzuolo CA (1980) Space–time invariance in learned motor skills. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 525–533
Viviani P, Terzuolo CA (1982) Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience 7:431–437
Viviani P, Terzuolo CA (1983) The organization of movement in handwriting and typing. In: Butterworth B (ed) Language production, vol II. Development, writing and other language processes. Academic Press, New York, pp 103–146
Viviani P, McCollum G (1983) The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements. Neuroscience 10:211–218
Viviani P, Cenzato M (1985) Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:828–845
Viviani P (1986) Do units of motor action really exist? In: Heuer H, Fromm C (eds) Generation and modulation of action patterns. Springer, Berlin, pp 201–216
Viviani P, Zanone PG (1988) Spontaneous covariations of movement parameters in 5- to 7-years old boys. J Mot Behav 20:205–216
Viviani P, Flash T (1995) Minimum-jerk, Two-thirds Power Law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:32–53
Viviani P, Schneider R (1991) A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:198–218
Viviani P, Stucchi N (1992) Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:603–623
Warabi T, Noda H, Yanagisawa N, Tashiro K, Shindo R (1986) Changes in sensorimotor function associated with the degree of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 109:1209–1224
Weiss P, Stelmach GE, Hefter H (1997) Programming of a movement sequence in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 120:91–102
Wichmann T, DeLong MR (1996) Functional and pathophysiological models of the basal ganglia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:751–758
Wiesendanger M (1998) Bernstein’s principle of equal simplicity and related concepts. In: Latash ML (ed) Bernstein’s tradition in movement studies, vol 1. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 105–125
Zia S, Cody F, O’Boyle D (2000) Joint position sense is impaired by Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 47:218–228
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Research Fund of Switzerland [Grant #3100-68169 to PV]. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for suggesting a number of significant improvements to the first draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1731-7
Appendices
Appendix 1
We define the parameters selected for the analysis of the movements and detail the data processing for their estimation.
Scaling and smoothing
Traces were aligned by computing the centre of gravity of the samples and shifting all samples so that the new centre was at the origin of the coordinate system. Most of the parameters involve the computation of time derivatives. Because we needed explicit expressions for derivatives (see later), we adopted an interpolation method based on harmonic analysis. The coordinates x = x(t) and y = y(t) of the movement were decomposed in Fourier series:
Preliminary tests showed that retaining the first 50 terms of the series yields an excellent approximation to the traces and is also effective for eliminating uncorrelated noise from the data. All further processing was applied to the truncated series. First and second time derivatives were computed analytically.
Computing the characteristic parameters of the trace
The following parameters were computed from each trace:
-
(a)
Tangential velocity [V(t)]:
$$ V(t) = \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{\rm d}x}{{\rm d}t}} \right)^{2} + \left( {\frac{{\rm d}y}{{\rm d}t}} \right)^{2} } $$The average velocity of the trace V 0 is related to the total trace length (L) by the equation \( V_{0} = {L \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {L T}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} T}. \)
-
(b)
Total length (L):
$$ L = \int\limits_{0}^{T} {V(t){\text{d}}t} = \int\limits_{0}^{T} {\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{\text{d}}x}}{{{\text{d}}t}}} \right)^{2} + \left( {\frac{{{\text{d}}y}}{{{\text{d}}t}}} \right)^{2} } } {\text{d}}t $$This parameter was computed by integrating numerically the tangential velocity.
-
(c)
Number of inflections [N I]. An inflection in a 2D trajectory is a point were the curvature of the trajectory changes sign. Inflections were located by identifying the sample index k such that the quantity
$$ \frac{{{\text{d}}x(t_{k} )}}{{{\text{d}}t}}\frac{{d^{2} y(t_{k} )}}{{{\text{d}}t^{2} }} - \frac{{d^{2} x(t_{k} )}}{{{\text{d}}t^{2} }}\frac{{{\text{d}}y(t_{k} )}}{{{\text{d}}t}} $$changes sign between k and k + 1.
-
(d)
Length of trajectory segments (L seg). Segments were defined as portions of the trajectory bounded by two successive points of inflection. Thus, in a trace there were N s = N I − 1 segments. When trajectory was almost straight, several inflections occurred in close succession.
-
(e)
Time average of the one-third power of the radius \( \left[ {R_{m}^{{*{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}}} } \right]. \) The function R(t) that describes how the radius of curvature of the trajectory changes in time is
$$ R(t) = \frac{{V(t)^{3} }}{{\left| {\frac{{{\text{d}}x}}{{{\text{d}}t}}\frac{{d^{2} y}}{{{\text{d}}t^{2} }} - \frac{{\text {d}}y}{{{\text{d}}t}}\left. {\frac{{d^{2} x}}{{{\text{d}}t^{2} }}} \right|} \right.}} $$The radius of curvature increases in the proximity of a point of inflection where it becomes infinite. The most recent formulation of Two-thirds Power Law circumvents this difficulty by expressing the velocity as a power function of the normalized radius R *(t) defined as
$$ R^{*} (t) = \frac{R(t)}{1 + \alpha R(t)} $$As the movement approaches an inflection, R * stays finite and tends to the limit 1/α. The required time average \( \langle R^{{*{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}}} \rangle \) was computed by numerical evaluation of the integral
$$ \langle R^{{*{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}}} \rangle = \frac{1}{T}\int\limits_{0}^{T} {R^{*} (t)^{{\frac{1}{3}}} {\text{d}}t} $$ -
(f)
Average curvature [C m]. Curvature is the inverse of the radius of curvature. It would be inappropriate to compute the average curvature using directly the Fourier approximation of the trajectory. Because the instantaneous velocity decreases with curvature as prescribed by the Two-thirds Power Law, and because the sampling rate is constant, the sample density around the high-curvatures portions of the trajectory is much higher than the density within low-curvature portions. Thus, numerical integration of the inverse of the radius R(t) would severely overestimate the average geometric curvature. Instead, we adopted the following resampling strategy. Let us consider a doubly differentiable time function φ = φ(t) such that φ(0) = 0 and φ(T) = T, where T is the total duration of the movement. The parametric equations [x = x(φ(t)), y = y(φ(t))] describe the same trajectory C as the original ones [x = x(t), y = y(t)]. However, the kinematics of the movement depends on the function φ, and the correspondent transformed velocity is in general different from the velocity of the actual movement:
$$ V_{\varphi } (t) = \frac{{{\text{d}}\varphi }}{{{\text{d}}t}}\left[ {\left( {\frac{{{\text{d}}x}}{{{\text{d}}\varphi }}} \right)^{2} + \left( {\frac{{{\text{d}}y}}{{{\text{d}}\varphi }}} \right)^{2} } \right]^{{\frac{1}{2}}} $$The expression above can be rewritten as a separable nonlinear differential equation:
$$ {\text{d}}\varphi = V_{\varphi } (t)\left[ {\left( {\frac{{{\text{d}}x}}{{{\text{d}}\varphi }}} \right)^{2} + \left( {\frac{{{\text{d}}y}}{{{\text{d}}\varphi }}} \right)^{2} } \right]^{{\frac{1}{2}}} {\text{d}}t $$Under mild continuity conditions, for any choice of the transformed velocity function V φ(t), solving the equation above yields the unique function φ that is compatible with this choice. We imposed the condition that the tangential velocity is constant and equal to the average velocity of the actual movement (V φ(t) = L/V m) and computed the solution φ(t) with a fourth-order Runge–Kutta algorithm with the boundary conditions φ(0) = 0 and φ(T) = T. By inserting the solution φ(t) back into the parametric equations, the original movement was resampled so that successive data points were spaced by a constant fraction of the total length rather then by a constant time interval (the total number of samples was kept equal to 2,000 as in the original trace). Finally, the average geometric curvature was calculated as the mean over all samples of the inverse of the radius. Note that this strategy was possible only because the Fourier series affords an analytical approximation to the traces.
-
(g)
Average gain factor [K m]. According to the Two-Thirds Power Law, the multiplicative parameter K (gain factor) is approximately constant over successive units of motor action. We computed the average gain factor for the entire trace by numerical estimation of the integral
$$ K_{m} = \frac{1}{T}\int\limits_{0}^{T} {\left| {\frac{{{\text{d}}x(t)}}{{{\text{d}}t}}\frac{{d^{2} y(t)}}{{{\text{d}}t^{2} }} - \frac{{{\text{d}}y(t)}}{{{\text{d}}t}}\frac{{d^{2} x(t)}}{{{\text{d}}t^{2} }}} \right|^{{\frac{1}{3}}} {\text{d}}t} $$In the same manner, we computed the average gain factors K seg for each segment within the complete trace.
Appendix 2
We specify the method for testing the statistical significance of parameters in the equation relating frame area A and segment length Lseg to segment gain Kseg. The three equations to be combined are (relevant stochastic variables in boldface)
As expected, c0 was almost indistinguishable from 1. Therefore
where C = c1c -ξ2 and φ = θ − ψξ. The variances σ 2e of the exponents ξ, θ and ψ are estimated directly from the regression equations
through the formula (Kendall and Stuart 1968, p. 395):
where ρ is Fisher’s correlation coefficient and N is the sample size. The averages of the regression coefficients a1 = log(c1) and a2 = log(c2) are μa1 = a1 and μa1 = a1, respectively. Their variances σ 2a are estimated by
If two stochastic variables are related by a monotonic function y = g(x) the pdf of y is given by fy(y) = fx(g−1(y))/dg(g−1(y))/dx (Papoulis 1965, p. 126). We assume that both a1 and a2 have a Gaussian pdf. Thus, because c1 = exp(a1) and c2 = exp(a2) the pdf of c1 and c2 have the common expression
By computing first and second moments of this distribution, average and variance of c1 and c2 can expressed in terms of known quantities
Finally, the pdf of C = c1c −ξ2 and φ = θ − ψξ cannot be computed in closed form. However, the pdf of all stochastic variables appearing in the expressions of C and φ are known. Thus, the variances σ 2C and σ 2φ and the corresponding 99% confidence intervals were finally estimated with a Montecarlo procedure (n = 30,000).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Viviani, P., Burkhard, P.R., Catalano Chiuvé, S. et al. Velocity control in Parkinson’s disease: a quantitative analysis of isochrony in scribbling movements. Exp Brain Res 194, 259–283 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1695-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1695-z