Skip to main content

Transition from monocular motion perception to dichoptic motion perception as a function of the stimulus duration

Abstract

We have recently developed a new motion display in which the monocular and dichoptic motion components move in opposite directions (Hayashi et al. 2007). In the present paper, we estimated the difference between the integration times required to detect the dichoptic motion and monocular motion by changing the duration of the stimulus. The results showed that monocular motion perception becomes more dominant as the stimulus duration becomes shorter, indicating that the detection of dichoptic motion is relatively slow process that requires a longer integration time compared with the process used to detect monocular motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (2001) Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: neural basis of the Pulfrich effect. Nat Neurosci 4:513–518

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeyer B, Julesz B, Kropfl W (1975) Dynamic random-dot stereograms reveal up-down anisotropy and left-right isotropy between cortical hemifields. Science 187:269–270

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carney T, Shadlen MN (1993) Dichoptic activation of the early motion system. Vision Res 33:1977–1995

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomi H, Abekawa N, Nishida S (2006) Spatiotemporal tuning of rapid interactions between visual-motion analysis and reaching movement. J Neurosci 26:5301–5308

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi R, Nishida S, Tolias A, Logothetis NK (2007) A method for generating a “purely first-order” dichoptic motion stimulus. J Vis 7:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi R, Miura K, Tabata H, Kawano K (2008) Eye movements in response to dichoptic motion: evidence for a parallel-hierarchical structure of visual motion processing in primates. J Neurophysiol 99:2329–2346

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol 195:215–243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B, Breitmeyer B, Kropfi W (1976) Binocular-disparity-dependent upper-lower hemifield anisotropy and left-right hemifield isotropy as revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms. Perception 5:129–141

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DH, Boynton RM, Baron WS (1976) Primate flicker sensitivity: psychophysics and electrophysiology. Science 194:1077–1079

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning ML, Finlay DC, Neill RA, Frost BG (1987) Detection threshold differences to crossed and uncrossed disparities. Vision Res 27:1683–1686

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nienborg H, Bridge H, Parker AJ, Cumming BG (2005) Neuronal computation of disparity in V1 limits temporal resolution for detecting disparity modulation. J Neurosci 25:10207–10219

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norcia AM, Tyler CW (1984) Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes. Vision Res 24:395–401

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian N, Andersen RA (1997) A physiological model for motion-stereo integration and a unified explanation of Pulfrich-like phenomena. Vision Res 37:1683–1698

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shadlen M, Carney T (1986) Mechanisms of human motion perception revealed by a new cyclopean illusion. Science 232:95–97

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS16GS0312.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryusuke Hayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, R., Kawano, K. Transition from monocular motion perception to dichoptic motion perception as a function of the stimulus duration. Exp Brain Res 190, 499–502 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1542-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1542-2

Keywords

  • Dichoptic motion
  • Motion perception
  • Duration threshold
  • Binocular vision
  • Monocular vision