Skip to main content
Log in

Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feedback is a central feature of neural systems and of crucial importance to human behaviour as shown in goal directed actions such as reaching-to-grasp. One important source of feedback in reach-to-grasp behaviour arises from the haptic information obtained after grasping an object. We manipulated the felt distance and/or size of a visually constant object to explore the role of haptic information in the calibration of reaching and grasping. Crucially, our design explored post-adaptation effects rather than the previously documented role of haptic information in movement organisation. A post-adaptation reach-to-grasp task showed: (1) distorted haptic feedback caused recalibration; (2) reach distance and grasp size could be calibrated separately but, if calibrated simultaneously, then (3) recalibration was greater when distance and size changed in a consistent (e.g. reaching for a larger object at a greater distance) rather than an inconsistent (e.g. a smaller object at a greater distance) fashion. These interactions reveal the integral nature of reach-to-grasp organization, that is, that reaching and grasping are integrated components of a single action system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bingham and Romack (1999) showed that errors in reach direction resulted in recalibration of subsequent feedforward control even when feedback guidance allowed online correction of errors to yield accurate acquisition of the target at the end of each reach.

References

  • Bingham G, Pagano C (1998) The necessity of a perception/action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:145–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham GP, Romack JL (1999) The rate of adaptation to displacement prisms remains constant despite acquisition of rapid calibration. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(5):1331–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham GP, Bradley A, Bailey M, Vinner R (2001) Accommodation, occlusion and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(6):1314–1344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham GP, Coats RO, Mon-Williams M (2007) Natural prehension in the absence of haptic feedback when calibration is allowed. Neuropsychologia 45:288–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movement. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Toni I, Chieffi S, Saetti MC (1995) Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Exp Brain Res 105:291–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Toni I, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1997) Tactile input of the hand and the control of reaching to grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 114:130–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32:1159–1178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M, Bingham GP (2007) Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. J Exp Psychol HPP 33:645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M, McIntosh RD (2000) A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:268–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR (1999) The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon. Exp Brain Res 126:578–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR (2001) A simple rule of thumb for elegant prehension. Curr Biol 11:1058–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patchay S, Haggard P, Castiello U (2003) A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects. Psychon Bull Rev 10:924–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redding GM, Wallace B (1997) Adaptive spatial alignment. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor CM, Narayan V (1982) Graphical analysis of prism adaptation, convergence accommodation, and accommodative convergence. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59:774–784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3:237–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vindras P, Viviani P (1998) Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:569–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Helmholtz H (1894/1924) Physiological Optics (New York: Dover 1962); English translation by J.P.C. Southall for the Optical Society of America (1924) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der Physiologiscen Optik (Hamburg: Voss 1909)

  • Wann JP, Rushton SK, Mon-Williams M (1995) Natural problems in the perception of virtual environments. Vision Res 35:2731–2736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Flanagan JR (2001) Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 5:487–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey P. Bingham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coats, R., Bingham, G.P. & Mon-Williams, M. Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 189, 211–220 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1418-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1418-5

Keywords

Navigation