Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interaction of posture and conscious perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent to which postural orientation and perception of orientation share common central processes is unknown. If central resources are shared, automatic postural orientation in space and conscious perception of gravitational vertical (GV) or surface horizontal (SH) orientation should vary similarly with changing frequencies of surface tilts. Furthermore, shared central processing may result in altered postural orientation depending on the focus of conscious perception. Blindfolded, healthy subjects indicated perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal while standing on a tilting surface or sitting in an earth-fixed chair with only the feet on the tilting surface. Subjects oriented a hand-held rod to GV or perpendicular to the tilting support surface to indicate SH during anterior–posterior (A/P) sinusoidal surface tilt oscillation (±5°/0.025–0.4 Hz). The gain and phase relationships of rod and postural tilt with respect to surface tilt were analyzed in all conditions. Average rod-tilt during the GV task was below 1.5° and decreased with increasing frequency of surface oscillation, similar to the decrease in trunk tilt. Average rod-tilt when indicating SH was three to four times that of actual surface tilt during both sitting and standing postures and did not change across frequencies, unlike trunk tilt. Measures of postural stability were less variable during the GV than the SH task. This increased postural stability during the GV task and similar gain/phase patterns of postural and GV perceptual orientation across frequencies is consistent with shared central processing of automatic postural and conscious perception of orientation to gravity. In contrast, different gain/phase patterns of posture and conscious perception of SH orientation are consistent with separate processing of postural responses of changing surface orientation and perception of it. Conscious perception of sensory inputs related to verticality share central processing with postural control, which when accessed can have a stabilizing effect, whereas consciously perceiving a moving support surface can be destabilizing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bisdorff AR, Wolsey CJ, Anastasopoulos D, Bronstein AM, Gresty MA (1996) The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders. Brain 119(5):1523–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blümle A, Maurer C, Schweigart G, Mergner T (2006) A cognitive intersensory interaction mechanism in human postural control. Exp Brain Res 173:357–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (1999) Emergence of postural patterns as a function of vision and translation frequency. J Neurophysiol 81(5):2325–2339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (2001) Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture? Exp Brain Res 139(4):482–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (2002) Vestibular loss disrupts control of head and trunk when standing on a sinusoidally moving platform. J Vestib Res 11:371–390

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clément G, Gurfinkel VS, Lestienne F, Lipshits MI, Popov KE (1984) Adaptation of postural control to weightlessness. Exp Brain Res, 57:61–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick R, McCloskey DI (1994) Proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. J Physiol 478:173–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick RC, Taylor JL, McCloskey DI (1992) Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components. J Physiol 454:533–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurfinkel VS, Lipshits MI, Popov KE (1974) Maintenance of human vertical posture during sinusoidal disturbance applied to supporting platform. Effect of vibration on human organism. Nauka, Moscow, pp 125–131 (Russian)

  • Gurfinkel VS, Lipshits MI, Mori S, Popov KE (1975) Postural reactions to the controlled sinusoidal displacement of the supporting platform. Agressologie 17:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurfinkel VS, Ivanenko YP, Levik YS (1994) The contribution of foot deformation to the changes of muscular length and angle in the ankle joint during standing in man. Physiol Res 43(6):371–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurfinkel VS, Ivanenko YuP, Levik YuS, Babakova IA (1995) Kinesthetic reference for human orthograde posture. Neuroscience 68(1):229–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55(6):1369–1381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horak FB, Shupert CL, Dietz V, Horstmann G (1994) Vestibular and somatosensory contributions to responses to head and body displacements in stance. Exp Brain Res 100(1):93–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Indovina I, Maffei V, Bosco G, Zago M, Macaluso E, Laquaniti F (2005) Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science 308:416–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll JP (2001) Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. J Physiol 532(3):869–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keshner EA, Woollacott MH, Debu B (1988) Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans. Exp Brain Res 71(3):455–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M (1993) Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 97(1):139–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lestienne F, Gurfinkel VS (1988) Postural control in weightlessness: a dual process underlying adaptation to an unusual environment. Trends Neurosci 11:359–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loram ID, Maganaris CN, Lakie M (2004) Paradoxical muscle movement in human standing. J Physiol 556(3):683–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer C, Mergner T, Peterka RJ (2006a) Multisensory control of human upright stance. Exp Brain Res 171:231–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer C, Schweigart G, Mergner T (2006b) Pronounced overestimation of support surface tilt during stance. Exp Brain Res 168(1–2):41–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merfeld DM, Zupan L, Peterka RJ (1999) Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration. Nature 398:615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mergner T (2002) The Matryoshka Dolls principle in human dynamic behavior in space: a theory of linked references for multisensory perception and control of action. Curr Psychol Cogn 21(2–3):129–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergner T, Rosemeier T (1998) Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions—a conceptual model. Brain Res Rev 28:118–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt H (1983) A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften 70(6):272–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterka RJ (2002) Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 88(3):1097–1118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterka RJ, Loughlin PJ (2004) Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 91(1):410–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Roll JP (2002) Cutaneous afferents from human plantar sole contribute to body posture awareness. Neuroreport 13(15):1957–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M (1997) The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 52(4):M232–M240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale N, Bard C, LaRue J, Fleury M (1993) On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Exp Aging Res 19(1):1–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale N, Nougier V, Barraud PA, Bourdin C, Debu B, Poquin D, Raphel C (1999) Contribution of ankle, knee, and hip joints to the perception threshold for support surface rotation. Percept Psychophys 61(4):615–624

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen DG, Brockmiller C, Ashton-Miller JA, Schultz AB, Alexander NB (1998) Thresholds for sensing foot dorsi- and plantarflexion during upright stance: effects of age and velocity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 53(1):M33–M38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CL (1982) Smoothing and differentiation of displacement-time data: an application of splines and digital filtering. Int J Biomed Comput 13:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh EG (1973) Standing man, slow rhythmic tilting, importance of vision. Agressologie 14:79–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 16(1):1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G, Weigelt M, Poulter D, McNevin N (2003) Attentional focus on suprapostural tasks affects balance learning. Q J Exp Psychol 56(7):1191–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G, Mercer J, McNevin N, Guadagnoli MA (2004) Reciprocal influences of attentional focus on postural and suprapostural task performance. J of Motor Behav 36(2):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachry T, Gabriele W, Mercer J, Bezodis N (2005) Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 67:304–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by NIH Grant DC5945 and NS45553.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR, 97006-3499, USA

    W. Geoffrey Wright & Fay B. Horak

Authors
  1. W. Geoffrey Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fay B. Horak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Geoffrey Wright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, W.G., Horak, F.B. Interaction of posture and conscious perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal. Exp Brain Res 182, 321–332 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0990-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0990-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation