Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed

Abstract

It is typically assumed that basic features of human gait are determined by purely biomechanical factors. In two experiments, we test whether gait transition speed and preferred walking speed are also influenced by visual information about the speed of self-motion. The visual flow during treadmill locomotion was manipulated to be slower than, matched to, or faster than the physical gait speed (visual gains of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0). Higher flow rates elicit significantly lower transition speeds for both the Walk–Run and Run–Walk transition, as expected. Similarly, higher flow rates elicit significantly lower preferred walking speeds. These results suggest that visual information becomes calibrated to mechanical or energetic aspects of gait and contributes to the control of locomotor behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the more general term visual flow to refer to visual information for self-motion, not just the 2D changes in the optic array denoted by the term optic flow. The rate of visual flow refers to the speed of forward motion consistent with the time-varying image that is seen. Note that this is a characterization of the stimulus, not a perceptual property. See Mohler et al. (in press) for more detailed discussion and experimental manipulation on this topic.

  2. 2.

    There is no optimal speed in running or galloping, for energetic efficiency remains approximately constant over speed (Margaria et al. 1963; Full 1989; Kram and Taylor 1990).

References

  1. Alexander RM (1983) Walking and running. Am Sci 72:348–354

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbeau H, Rossignol S (1987) Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat. Brain Res 412:84–95

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bélanger M, Drew T, Provencher J, Rossignnol S (1996) A comparison of treadmill locomotion in adalt cats before and after spinal transection. J Neurophysiol 76:471–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beuter A, Lalonde F (1989) Analysis of a phase transition in human locomotion using singularity theory. Neurosci Res Commun 3:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cavagna GA, Kaneko M (1977) Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol 268:467–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavagna GA, Thys H, Zamboni A (1976) The sources of external work in level walking and running. J Physiol 262:639–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniels GL, Newell KM (2002) Perceived task expectations and the walk-run gait transition. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Army Science Conference, Orlando

  8. Daniels GL, Newell KM (2003) Attentional focus influences the walk-run transition in human locomotion. Biol Psychol 63:163–178

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diedrich FJ, Warren WH (1995) Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:183–202

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Drew T (2000) Neuronal mechanisms for the adaptive control of locomotion In: Proceedings of the international symposium on adaptive motion of animals and machines, Montreal, pp 1–12

  11. Eidelberg E, Story JL, Nystel J (1980) Stepping by chronic spinal cats. Exp Brain Res 40:241–246

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Falls HB, Humphrey LD (1976) Energy cost of running and walking in young women. Med Sci Sports 8:9–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Farley CT, Taylor CR (1991) A mechanical trigger for the trot-gallop transition in horses. Science 253:306–308

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fatuga GA, Warren WH (1996) The role of visual perception with respect to gait transition patterns. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis, Brown University

  15. Full RJ (1989) Mechanics and energetics of terrestrial locomotion: from bipeds to polypeds. In: Wieser W, Gnaiger E (eds) Energy transformation in cells and animals, Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 175–182

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gatesy SM, Biewener AA (1991) Bipedal locomotion: effects of speed, size and limb posture in birds and humans. J Zool Lond 224:127–147

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grillner S, Zangger P (1979) On the central generation of locomotion in the low spinal cat. Exp Brain Res 34:241–261

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Christensen R, Jacobsen SC (2000) Design specifications for the second generation Sarcos treadport locomotion interface. In: Haptics Symposium, Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, vol DSC-Vol. 69-2 November, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 1293–1298

  19. Hreljac A (1993) Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion. Med Sci Sports Exer 25:1158–1162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hreljac A, Imamura R, Escamilla RF, Casebolt J, Sison M (2005) Preferred and energetically optimal transition speeds during backward human locomotion. J Sports sci Med 4:446–454

    Google Scholar 

  21. Konczak J (1994) Effects of optic flow on the kinematics of human gait: a comparison of young and older adults. J Motor Behav 26:225–236

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kram R, Domingo A, Ferris DP (1997) Effect of reduced gravity on the preferred walk-run transition speed. J Exp Biol 200:821–826

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kram R, Taylor R (1990) Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature 346:265–267

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee DN, Lishman JR (1975) Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Hum Mov Stud 1:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lovely RG, Gregor RJ, Roy RR, Edgerton VR (1990) Weight-bearing hindlimb stepping in treadmill-exercised adult spinal cats. Brain Res 514

  26. Malcolm P, Lenoir M, Aerts P, Segers V, Clercq DD (2005) Treadmill versus overground run to walk and walk to run transition speed in unsteady state locomotion conditions. In: Proceedings of the 20th congress of the international society of biomechanics and 29th annual meeting of the American society of biomechanics, Cleveland, p 555

  27. Margaria R (1976) Biomechanics and energetics of muscular exercise. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  28. Margaria R, Cerretelli P, Aghemo P, Sassi G (1963) Energy cost of running. J Appl Physiol 18:367–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mercier J, Gallais DL, Durand M, Goudal C, Micallef JP, Prefaut C (1994) Energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory responses at the transition between walking and running. Eur J Appl Physiol 69:525–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Minetti AE, Ardigo LP, Saibene F (1994) The transition between walking and running in humans: Metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients. Acta Physiol Scand 150:315–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohler BJ, Thompson WB, Creem-Regehr SH, Willemsen P, Pick HL Jr, Rieser JJ (2007) Calibration of locomotion due to visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 4(1)

  32. Pailhous J, Ferrandez AM, Fluckiger M, Baumberger B (1990) Unintentional modulations of human gait by optic flow. Behav Brain Res 38:275–281

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pearson KG, Rossignol S (1991) Fictive motor patterns in chronic spinal cats. J Neurophysiol 66:1874–1887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prilutsky BI, Gregor R (2001) Swing- and support-related muscle actions differentially trigger human walk-run and run-walk transitions. J Exp Psychol 204:2277–2287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Prokop T, Schubert M, Berger W (1997) Visual influence on human locomotion. Modulation to changes in optic flow Exp Brain Res 114:63–70

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rieser JJ, Pick HL Jr, Ashmead D, Garing A (1995) Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. J Exp Psychol: Hum percept perform 21:480–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sparrow W, Newell K (1998) Metabolic energy expenditure and the regulation of movement economy. Pyschonomic Bull Rev Psychonomic Soc 5:173–196

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thorstensson A, Roberthson H (1987) Adaptations to changing speed in human locomotion: speed of transition between walking and running. Acta Physiol Scand 131:211–214

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Turvey MT, Holt KG, Obusek J, Salo A, Kugler PN (1996) Adiabatic transformability hypothesis of human locomotion. Biol Cybern 74:107–115

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Warren WH, Kay BA, Yilmaz EH (1996) Visual control of posture during walking: functional specificity. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 22:818–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Betty J. Mohler.

Additional information

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant 0121084.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohler, B.J., Thompson, W.B., Creem-Regehr, S.H. et al. Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Exp Brain Res 181, 221–228 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0917-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Walking Speed
  • Transition Speed
  • Visual Gain
  • Slow Condition
  • Belt Speed