Skip to main content
Log in

Movement kinematics in prehension are affected by grasping objects of different mass

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has identified that prehension is composed of a reach and a grasp component and that the position and size of the object can independently affect each. However, no effects on prior to contact prehension kinematics have been reported for manipulations in object mass. We felt that this ‘lack of a finding’ was surprising, as a more accurate grip position on heavier objects would prevent slippage and rotation when lifting the object. Therefore, we hypothesized that increased object mass would effect the grasp component movement kinematics prior to contact in preparation for a stable final grip placement on the object. We report two experiments in which participants reached, grasped and lifted objects of various size and mass, and their movement kinematics were recorded using a motion tracking system. The results showed that the mass of the object significantly influenced prior-to-contact grasp kinematics. Both studies showed that the heavy compared to light objects caused increased peak grasp aperture, a final finger and thumb placement on the object that more closely passed through the object centre of mass, increased lift delay and reduced peak lift velocity. The data are discussed in terms of how object mass influences the reach, grasp and lift components of prehensile movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that for each object size, there was a light and heavy object. Therefore, the manipulation of mass did not co-vary with size. However, the manipulation of object size did co-vary with mass so that objects of increased size were also heavier. Because of this, any reliable effects of object size might result from size or mass differences.

  2. While participants used all of their digits to make the grasp, we were only able to record the kinematic position of the index finger and thumb due to the limitations of using a two-camera motion tracking system.

  3. Circular statistics were not used as it was expected that there would never be an instance of a participant grasping the object at 5–355° where the use of circular statistics would be critical.

References

  • Arbib MA, Iberall T, Lyons D (1985) Coordinated control programs for control of the hands. Exp Brain Res Suppl 10:111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootsma RJ, Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Zaal FT (1994) The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Exp Brain Res 98:535–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer A, Georgiou I, Glover S, Castiello U (2006) Adjusting reach to lift movements to sudden visible changes in target’s weight. Exp Brain Res (in press)

  • Flanagan JR, Wing AM, Allison S, Spenceley A (1995) Effects of surface texture on weight perception when lifting objects with a precision grip. Percept Psychophys 57:282–290

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27:3–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349:154–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: J Long A Baddley (eds) Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension. J Motor Behav 16:235–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Wing AM (2003) Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry. Exp Brain Res 152:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Movem Sci 9:149–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9:1265–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg 4:902

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3:237–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir PL, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Cargoe SL, Frazer MB (1991) The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. J Motor Behav 23:192–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Motor Behav 18:245–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Professor Glyn Humphreys for the loan of the motion tracking equipment, without which these data would not be possible. Thanks also to the participants that volunteered their time to the study. The School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham funded the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Eastough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eastough, D., Edwards, M.G. Movement kinematics in prehension are affected by grasping objects of different mass. Exp Brain Res 176, 193–198 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0749-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0749-3

Keywords

Navigation