Skip to main content

Time to reconfigure balancing behaviour in man: changing visual condition while riding a continuously moving platform

Experimental Brain Research volume 178, pages 18–36 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

While balancing on a continuously antero-posterior (A-P) translating platform (10 cm, 0.5 Hz), the head normally oscillates with the platform without vision but is stabilized in space with vision. We estimated the time to shift from one to the other balancing behaviour when visual condition changed at some stage during the balancing trials. Ten subjects performed randomly 50 balancing trials (each lasting 18 s): 10 trials with eyes open (EO), 10 with eyes closed (EC), 15 in which participants started with EO and closed their eyes (condition EO → EC) in response to an acoustic signal delivered during the trial, and 15 starting with EC and closing their eyes (EC → EO) in response to the same signal. No other specific instruction was given. Displacements of malleolus, hip and head, and EMG from leg and axial muscles were recorded. Indexes of amplitude of A-P head and hip oscillation and of amplitude of EMG activity were computed. All variables were larger with EC than EO. On changing visual condition during the trial, the pattern of head and hip movement and of muscle activity turned into that appropriate for the new visual condition in a time-interval ranging from about 1 to 2.5 s. For each subject, the mean latency of the change in the balancing behaviour was assessed by statistical methods. On average, the latencies of kinematics and EMG changes proved to be longer for the EO → EC condition than viceversa. Further, the latencies of the changes were also measured across all EO → EC and EC → EO individual trials. These values were clustered around particular epochs of the first few oscillation cycles following the shift in visual condition. The results show that subjects can rapidly adapt their balancing behaviour to the new visual condition. However, they appear to refrain from releasing the new behaviour were this unfit, and unfastened it at appropriate time in the next platform translation cycle. These findings reveal the temporal and spatial features of the automatic release of the new balancing strategy in response to a shift in the ongoing sensory set, and emphasize the swiftness in the change in balancing behaviour when subjects pass from a non-visual to a visual reference frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8.

References

  • Aruin AS, Forrest WR, Latash ML (1998) Anticipatory postural adjustments in conditions of postural instability. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109:350–359

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bottini G, Karnath HO, Vallar G, Sterzi R, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS, Paulesu E (2001) Cerebral representations for egocentric space: functional-anatomical evidence from caloric vestibular stimulation and neck vibration. Brain 124:1182–1196

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bove M, Diverio M, Pozzo T, Schieppati M (2001) Neck muscle vibration disrupts steering of locomotion. J Appl Physiol 91:581–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyden ES, Katoh A, Raymond JL (2004) Cerebellum-dependent learning: the role of multiple plasticity mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:581–609

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein AM, Buckwell D (1997) Automatic control of postural sway by visual motion parallax. Exp Brain Res 113: 243–248

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (1999) Emergence of postural patterns as a function of vision and translation frequency. J Neurophysiol 81:2325–2339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (2001a) Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture? Exp Brain Res 139:482–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (2001b–2002) Vestibular loss disrupts control of head and trunk on a sinusoidally moving platform. J Vestib Res 11:371–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (2003) Voluntary control of postural equilibrium patterns. Behav Brain Res 143:121–140

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong RK, Horak FB, Woollacott MH (1999) Time-dependent influence of sensorimotor set on automatic responses in perturbed stance. Exp Brain Res 124:513–519

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corna S, Grasso M, Nardone A, Schieppati M (1995) Selective depression of medium-latency leg and foot muscle responses to stretch by an alpha 2-agonist in humans. J Physiol 484:803–809

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corna S, Nardone A, Prestinari A, Galante M, Grasso M, Schieppati M (2003) Comparison of Cawthorne–Cooksey exercises and sinusoidal support surface translations to improve balance in patients with unilateral vestibular deficit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1173–1184

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corna S, Tarantola J, Nardone A, Giordano A, Schieppati M (1999) Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited? Exp Brain Res 124:331–341

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day BL, Reynolds RF (2005) Vestibular reafference shapes voluntary movement. Curr Biol 15:1390–1394

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Nunzio AM, Nardone A, Schieppati M (2005) Head stabilization on a continuously oscillating platform: the effect of a proprioceptive disturbance on the balancing strategy. Exp Brain Res 165:261–272

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz V, Trippel M, Ibrahim IK, Berger W (1993) Human stance on a sinusoidally translating platform: balance control by feedforward and feedback mechanisms. Exp Brain Res 93:352–362

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz V, Kowalewski R, Nakazawa K, Colombo G (2000) Effects of changing stance conditions on anticipatory postural adjustment and reaction time to voluntary arm movement in humans. J Physiol 524:617–627

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra TM, Schoner G, Gielen CC (1994) Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment. Exp Brain Res 97:477–486

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice uncertainty and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 46:725–743

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso R, Glasauer S, Takei Y, Berthoz A (1996a) The predictive brain: anticipatory control of head direction for the steering of locomotion. Neuroreport 7:1170–1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso M, Mazzini L, Schieppati M (1996b) Muscle relaxation in Parkinson’s disease: a reaction time study. Mov Disord 11:411–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioral organization of goal directed movements. Clarendon, Oxford

  • Keele SW, Posner MI (1968) Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. J Exp Psychol 77:155–158

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber M, Horstmann GA, Dietz V (1990) Body sway stabilization in human posture. Acta Otolaryngol 110:168–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kluzik J, Horak FB, Peterka RJ (2005) Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface. Exp Brain Res 162:474–489

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizkova M, Hlavacka F, Gatev P (1993) Visual control of human stance on a narrow and soft support surface. Physiol Res 42:267–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, DiZio PA (2000) Aspects of body self-calibration. Trends Cogn Sci 4:279–288

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mergner T, Schweigart G, Maurer C, Blumle A (2005) Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions. Exp Brain Res 167:535–556

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone A, Schieppati M (2004) Group II spindle fibres and afferent control of stance. Clues from diabetic neuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol 115:779–789

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone A, Grasso M, Tarantola J, Corna S, Schieppati M (2000) Postural coordination in elderly subjects standing on a periodically moving platform. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:1217–1223

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone A, Grasso M, Schieppati M (2006) Balance control in peripheral neuropathy: are patients equally unstable under static and dynamic conditions? Gait Posture 23:364–373

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus WM, Straube A, Brandt T (1984) Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain 107:1143–1163

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterka RJ (2002) Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 88:1097–1118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterka RJ, Loughlin PJ (2004) Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 91:410–423

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Klein RM (1976) Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychol Rev 83:157–171

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redding GM, Wallace B (2006) Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: review and analysis. Neuropsychologia 44:1–20

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieppati M, Giordano A, Nardone A (2002) Variability in a dynamic postural task attests ample flexibility in balance control mechanisms. Exp Brain Res 144:200–210

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieppati M, Nardone A (1991) Free and supported stance in Parkinson’s disease. The effect of posture and ‘postural set’ on leg muscle responses to perturbation and its relation to the severity of the disease. Brain 114:1227–1244

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieppati M, Nardone A (1995) Time course of ‘set’-related changes in muscle responses to stance perturbation in humans. J Physiol 487:787–796

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schieppati M, Nardone A, Musazzi M (1986) Modulation of the Hoffmann reflex by rapid muscle contraction or release. Hum Neurobiol 5:59–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schieppati M, Tacchini E, Nardone A, Tarantola J, Corna S (1999) Subjective perception of body sway. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:313–322

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M, De Nunzio AM, Schieppati M (2005) Trunk muscle proprioceptive input assists steering of locomotion. Neurosci Lett 384:127–132

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonov PI, Hsiao H, Dotson BW, Ammons DE (2003) Control and perception of balance at elevated and sloped surfaces. Hum Factors 45:136–147

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmann D, Belting C, Schwarz M, Diener HC (1994) Influence of visual and somatosensory input on leg iEMG responses in dynamic posturography in normals. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93:7–14

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Sonderen JF, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CC (1988) Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location. Exp Brain Res 71:320–328

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright WG, Glasauer S (2006) Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance. Exp Brain Res 7:1–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Antonio Nardone for critical reading of the manuscript. This investigation was supported by the grants PRIN 2003 no. 2003050011, FIRB 2001 no. RBNE01FJ4J from the Italian Ministry of Education, and Ricerca Finalizzata 2003 from the Italian Ministry of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro Studi Attività Motorie (CSAM), Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Scientific Institute of Pavia, Via Salvatore Mugeri 10, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    Alessandro Marco De Nunzio & Marco Schieppati

  2. Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Pavia, Via Forlanini 6, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    Marco Schieppati

Authors
  1. Alessandro Marco De Nunzio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Schieppati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Schieppati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Nunzio, A.M., Schieppati, M. Time to reconfigure balancing behaviour in man: changing visual condition while riding a continuously moving platform. Exp Brain Res 178, 18–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0708-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0708-z

Keywords

  • Vision
  • Dynamic equilibrium
  • Processing time