Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 172, Issue 2, pp 163–174 | Cite as

The Ia afferent feedback of a given movement evokes the illusion of the same movement when returned to the subject via muscle tendon vibration

  • Frederic AlbertEmail author
  • Mikael Bergenheim
  • Edith Ribot-Ciscar
  • Jean-Pierre Roll
Research Article
First Online:

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to further investigate the contribution of primary muscle spindle feedback to proprioception and higher brain functions, such as movement trajectory recognition. For this purpose, complex illusory movements were evoked in subjects by applying patterns of muscle tendon vibration mimicking the natural Ia afferent pattern. Ia afferent messages were previously recorded using microneurographic method from the six main muscle groups acting on the ankle joint during imposed “writing like” movements. The mean Ia afferent pattern was calculated for each muscle group and used as a template to pilot each vibrator. Eleven different vibratory patterns were applied to ten volunteers. Subjects were asked both to copy the perceived illusory movements by hand on a digitizing tablet and to recognize and name the corresponding graphic symbol. The results show that the Ia afferent feedback of a given movement evokes the illusion of the same movement when it is applied to the subject via the appropriate pattern of muscle tendon vibration. The geometry and the kinematic parameters of the imposed and illusory movements are very similar and the so-called “two-thirds power law” is present in the reproduction of the vibration-induced illusory movements. Vibrations within the “natural” frequency range of Ia fibres firing (around 30 Hz) produce clear illusions of movements in all the tested subjects. In addition, increasing the mean frequency of the vibration patterns resulted in a linear increase in the size of the illusory movements. Lastly, the subjects were able to recognize and name the symbols evoked by the vibration-induced primary muscle spindle afferent patterns in 83% of the trials. These findings suggest that the “proprioceptive signature” of a given movement is associated with the corresponding “perceptual signature”. The neural mechanisms possibly underlying the sensory to perceptual transformation are discussed in the general framework of “the neuronal population vector model”.

Keywords

Muscle spindle feedback Muscle tendon vibration Illusory movements Proprioception Writing Cognition 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from Ministère de la Recherche, ACI Cognitique and AFM.

References

  1. Albert F, Ribot-Ciscar E, Fiocchi M, Bergenheim M, Roll JP (2005) Proprioceptive feedback in humans expresses invariant during writing. Exp Brain Res 164(2):242–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergenheim M, Ribot-Ciscar E, Roll JP (2000) Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: I. Muscle spindle feedback during spatially oriented movements. Exp Brain Res 134:301–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Paillard J, Forget R, Lamarre Y (1995) Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:246–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark FJ, Grigg P, Chapin JW (1989) The contribution of articular receptors to proprioception with the fingers in humans. J Neurophysiol 61:186–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole J (1995) Pride and daily marathon. MIT, Cambridge Google Scholar
  6. Collins DF, Prochazka A (1996) Movement illusions evoked by ensemble cutaneous input from the dorsum of the human hand. J Physiol 496(Pt 3):857–871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Todd G, Gandevia SC (2005) Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinaesthesia at the index finger, elbow and knee. J Neurophysiol 94:1699–1706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordo PJ (1990) Kinesthetic control of a multijoint movement sequence. J Neurophysiol 63:161–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Edin BB, Johansson N (1995) Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. J Physiol 487(Pt 1):243–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eklund G (1972) Position sense and state of contraction; the effects of vibration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 35:606–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrell WR, Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1987) The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute. J Physiol 386:63–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Forget R (1986) Perte des afférences sensorielles et fonction motrice chez l’homme. Doctoral Thesis, Université de MontréalGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandevia SC (1985) Illusory movements produced by electrical stimulation of low-threshold muscle afferents from the hand. Brain 108(Pt 4):965–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gandevia SC (1996) Kinesthesia: roles for afferent signals and motor commands. In: Rowel LB, Shepertd JT (eds) Handbook of physiology, section 12. Exercise: regulation and integration of multiple system. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 128–172Google Scholar
  15. Gandevia SC, Burke D (1992) Does the nervous system depend on kinaesthetic information to control limb movement? Behav Brain Sci 15:614–632Google Scholar
  16. Georgopoulos AP (1995) Current issues in directional motor control. Trends Neurosci 18:506–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Caminiti R, Massey JT (1982) On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J Neurosci 2:1527–1537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE (1990) Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Arbor Symp Quant Biol 55:837–847Google Scholar
  19. Gilhodes JC, Roll JP (2001) Virtual hand-writing induced by well-patterned tendon vibration in humans. Behav Pharmacol 12(suppl 1):S41Google Scholar
  20. Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB (1972) The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 95:705–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grill SE, Hallett M (1995) Velocity sensitivity of human muscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors. J Physiol 489:593–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagbarth KE, Vallbo AB (1967) Afferent response to mechanical stimulation of muscle receptors in man. Acta Soc Med Ups 72:102–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones LA (1988) Motor illusions: what do they reveal about proprioception? Psychol Bull 103:72–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones KE, Wessberg J, Vallbo AB (2001) Directional tuning of human forearm muscle afferents during voluntary wrist movements. J Physiol 536:635–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalaska JF (1991) What parameters of reaching are encoded by discharges of cortical cells. In: Humphrey DR, Freund HJ (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley, Chichester, pp 307–330Google Scholar
  26. Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, Viviani P (1983) The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 54:115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matthews PBC, Simmonds A (1974) Sensations of finger movement elicited by pulling upon flexor tendons in man. J Physiol Lond 239:27–28Google Scholar
  28. Macefield G, Gandevia SC, Burke D (1990) Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand. J Physiol 429:113–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ribot-Ciscar E, Bergenheim M, Roll JP (2002) The preferred sensory direction of muscle spindle primary endings influences the velocity coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 145:429–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ribot-Ciscar E, Bergenheim M, Albert F, Roll JP (2003) Proprioceptive population coding of limb position in humans. Exp Brain Res 149:512–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Roll JP (2003) Physiologie de la kinesthèse. La proprioception musculaire: sixième sens ou sens premier? Nouvelles Propositions pour une physiologie de l’action. Berthoz A, Petit JL (eds) Intellectica 36/37:49–66Google Scholar
  32. Roll JP, Vedel JP (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47:177–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC (1995) Proprioceptive sensory codes mediating movement trajectory perception: human hand vibration-induced drawing illusions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:295–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Roll JP, Vedel JP, Ribot E (1989) Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study. Exp Brain Res 76:213–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Roll R (1994) Kinaesthetic illusions as tools in understanding motor imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17(2):220–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Roll R, Harlay F (1996) Are proprioceptive sensory inputs combined into a “gestalt”? Vibration-induced virtual hand drawing or visual target motion. Attention and performance 12:291–314Google Scholar
  37. Roll JP, Bergenheim M, Ribot-Ciscar E (2000) Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: II. Muscle-spindle feedback during “drawing-like” movements. Exp Brain Res 134:311–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roll JP, Albert F, Ribot-Ciscar E, Bergenheim M (2004) “Proprioceptive signature” of cursive writing in humans: a multi-population coding. Exp Brain Res 157:359–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sacks O (1988) The man who mistook his wife for a hat and other clinical tales. In: Simon S (ed) Summit Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz AB, Moran DW (2000) Arm trajectory and representation of movement processing in motor cortical activity. Eur J Neurosci 12:1851–1856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sperry RW (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43:482–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Teasdale N, Forget R, Bard C, Paillard J, Fleury M, Lamarre Y (1993) The role of proprioceptive information for the production of isometric forces and for handwriting tasks. Acta Psychol (Amst) 82:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Teuber HL (1960) Perception. Handbook of physiology. Magoun HW, Washington, DC (eds) Am Physiol Soc 3:1595–1668Google Scholar
  44. Verschueren SM, Cordo PJ, Swinnen SP (1998) Representation of wrist joint kinematics by the ensemble of muscle spindles from synergistic muscles. J Neurophysiol 79:2265–2276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Viviani P (1986) Do units of motor action really exist? In: Heuer H, Fromm C (eds) Generation and modulation of actions patterns. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–216Google Scholar
  46. Viviani P (1998) Plein et déliés. Le cerveau et le mouvement. Science et vie. Hors série, vol 204, pp 36–47Google Scholar
  47. Viviani P, Terzuolo C (1982) Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience 7:431–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Viviani P, McCollum G (1983) The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements. Neuroscience 10:211–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Von Holst E, Mittelstaedt H (1973) The reafferent principle. Interaction between the central nervous system and the periphery. The behavioural physiology of animals and man. Lond Methuen 1:139–173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederic Albert
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mikael Bergenheim
    • 2
    • 3
  • Edith Ribot-Ciscar
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre Roll
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Humaine, UMR 6149Université de ProvenceMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Center of Musculoskeletal researchUniversity of GävleGävleSweden
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryCentral Hospital KarlstadKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options