Abstract
Afferent auditory processing in the human brainstem is often assumed to be determined by acoustic stimulus features alone and immune to stimulation by other senses or cognitive factors. In contrast, we show that lipreading during speech perception influences early acoustic processing. Event-related brainstem potentials were recorded from ten healthy adults to concordant (acoustic-visual match), conflicting (acoustic-visual mismatch) and unimodal stimuli. Audiovisual (AV) interactions occurred as early as ∼11 ms post-acoustic stimulation and persisted for the first 30 ms of the response. Furthermore, the magnitude of interaction depended on AV pairings. These findings indicate considerable plasticity in early auditory processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PS, Springer JA, Kaufman JN, Possing ET (2000) Human temporal lobe activation by speech and non-speech sounds. Cereb Cortex 10:512–528
Bradlow AR, Kraus N, Nicol TG, Mcgee TJ, Cunningham J, Zecker SG, Carrell TD (1999) Effects of lengthened formant transition duration on discrimination and neural representation of synthetic CV syllables by normal and learning-disabled children. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2086–2096
Burnett LR, Stein BE, Chaponis D, Wallace MT (2004) Superior colliculus lesions preferentially disrupt multisensory orientation. Neuroscience 124:535–547
Burton MW, Small SL, Blumstein SE (2000) The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 12:679–690
Bushara KO, Hanakawa T, Immisch I, Toma K, Kansaku K, Hallett M (2003) Neural correlates of cross-modal binding. Nat Neurosci 6:190–195
Callan DE, Jones JA, Munhall K, Callan AM, Kroos C, Vatikiotis-Bateson E (2003) Neural processes underlying perceptual enhancement by visual speech gestures. Neuroreport 14:2213–2218
Calvert GA (2001) Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 11:1110–1123
Calvert GA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams SC, McGuire PK, Woodruff PW, Iversen SD, David AS (1997) Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 276:593–596
Calvert GA, Brammer MJ, Bullmore ET, Campbell R, Iversen SD, David AS (1999) Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding. Neuroreport 10:2619–2623
Calvert GA, Campbell R, Brammer MJ (2000) Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Curr Biol 10:649–657
Campbell R, MacSweeney M, Surguladze S, Calvert G, McGuire P, Suckling J, Brammer MJ, David AS (2001) Cortical substrates for the perception of face actions: an fMRI study of the specificity of activation for seen speech and for meaningless lower-face acts. Cogn Brain Res 12:233–243
Celesia GG (1968) Auditory evoked responses. Intracranial and extracranial average evoked responses. Arch Neurol 19:430–437
Chomsky N (1985) The logical structure of linguistic theory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Bradlow A, Kraus N (2001) Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol 112:758–767
Galbraith GC, Arbagey PW, Branski R, Comerci N, Rector PM (1995) Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response. Neuroreport 6:2363–2367
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119:593–609
Gardi J, Merzenich M, McKean C (1979) Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat. Audiology 18:358–381
Giard MH, Peronnet F (1999) Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J Cogn Neurosci 11:473–490
Grant KW, Seitz PF (2000) The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1197–1208
Green KP (1987) The perception of speaking rate using visual information from a talker’s face. Percept Psychophys 42:587–593
Hall JWI (1992) Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights
Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–1579
Hayes EA, Warrier CM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N (2003) Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol 114:673–684
Hoormann J, Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J (2000) Early attention effects in human auditory-evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 37:29–42
Hyde PS, Knudsen EI (2001) A topographic instructive signal guides the adjustment of the auditory space map in the optic tectum. J Neurosci 21:8586–8593
Jacobson J (1991) The auditory brainstem response. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Jiang W, Stein BE (2003) Cortex controls multisensory depression in superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 90:2123–2135
Jiang W, Jiang H, Stein BE (2002) Two corticotectal areas facilitate multisensory orientation behavior. J Cogn Neurosci Nov 15:1240–1255
Johnson KL, Nicol TG, Kraus N (2005) The brainstem response to speech. A biological marker of auditory processing Ear and Haring (in press)
Kent RD (1984) Psychobiology of speech development: coemergence of language and a movement system. Am J Physiol 246:R888–R894
King C, Warrier CM, Hayes E, Kraus N (2002) Deficits in auditory brainstem pathway encoding of speech sounds in children with learning problems. Neurosci Lett 319:111–115
Klucharev V, Sams M (2004) Interaction of gaze direction and facial expressions processing: ERP study. Neuroreport 22:621–625
Klucharev V, Mottonen R, Sams M (2003) Electrophysiological indicators of phonetic and non-phonetic multisensory interactions during audiovisual speech perception. Cogn Brain Res 18:65–75
Kraus N, Nicol T (2005) Brainstem origins for cortical ‘what’ and ‘where’ pathways in the auditory system. Trends Neurosci 28:176–181
Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Palva JM, Sams M, Hietanen JK, Aronen HJ, Ilmoniemi RJ (1998) Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by mag. Neurosci Lett 253:147–150
Lu ST, Hämäläinen MS, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lounasmaa OV, Sams M, Vilkman V (1991) Seeing faces activates three separate areas outside the occipital visual cortex in man. Neuroscience 43:287–290
Møller AR (1999) Neural mechanisms of BAEP. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 49:27–35
MacDonald J, McGurk H (1978) Visual influences on speech perception processes. Percept Psychophys 24:253–257
MacLeod A, Summerfield Q (1987) Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. Br J Audiol 21:131–141
Marks LE (1982) Bright sneezes and dark coughs, loud sunlight and soft moonlight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:177–193
Marks LE (2004) Cross-modal interactions in speeded classification. In: Calvert GA, Spence C, Stein BE (eds) The handbook of mutisensory processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 85–106
Marsh JT, Brown WS, Smith JC (1975) Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: correlates of low pitch auditory perception in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 38:113–119
Massaro DW (1998) Perceiving talking faces: from speech perception to a behavioral principle. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Meredith MA, Stein BE (1986) Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol 56:640–662
Möttönen R, Krause CM, Tiippana K, Sams M (2002) Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex. Cogn Brain Res 13:417–425
Nishitani N, Hari R (2002) Viewing lip forms: cortical dynamics. Neuron 19:1211–1220
Oatman LC, Anderson BW (1977) Effects of visual attention on tone burst evoked auditory potentials. Exp Neurol 57:200–211
Perrault TJ, Vaughan JW, Stein BE, Wallace MT (2003) Neuron-specific response characteristics predict the magnitude of multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol 90:4022–4026
Picton TW, Hillyard SA (1974) Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 36:191–199
Russo N, Nicol T, Musacchia G, Kraus N (2004) Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2021–2030
Russo NM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Hayes EA, Kraus N (2005) Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem. Behav Brain Res 6:95–103
Saito DN, Yoshimura K, Kochiyama T, Okada T, Honda M, Sadato N (2005) Cross-modal binding and activated attentional networks during audio-visual speech integration: a functional MRI study. Cereb Cortex 16 (Epub ahead of print)
Sams M, Aulanko R, Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Lounasmaa OV, Lu ST, Simola J (1991) Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neurosci Lett 127:141–145
Scott SK, Johnsrude IS (2003) The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci 26:100–107
Sekiyama K, Tohkura Y (1991) McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am 90:1797–1805
Stein BE (1998) Neural mechanisms for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviors. Exp Brain Res 123:124–135
Stein BE, Wallace MW, Stanford TR, Jiang W (2002) Cortex governs multisensory integration in the midbrain. Neuroscientist 8:306–314
Suga N, Ma X (2003) Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:783–794
Sumby WH, Pollack I (1954) Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 26:212–215
Summerfield Q (1987) Hearing by eye. In Dodd B, Campbell R (eds) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 3–51
Teder-Salejarvi WA, McDonald JJ, Di Russo F, Hillyard SA (2002) An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14:106–114
Tervaniemi M, Hugdahl K (2003) Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions. Brain Res Rev 43:231–246
Wallace MT, Meredith MA, Stein BE (1993) Converging influences from visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices onto output neurons of the superior collicuclus. J Neurophysiol 69:1797–1809
Wallace MT, Meredith MA, Stein BE (1998) Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus of the alert cat. J Neurophysiol 80:1006–1010
Wallace MT, Perrault TJ Jr, Hairston WD, Stein BE (2004) Visual experience is necessary for the development of multisensory integration. J Neurosci 27:9580–9584
Watkins K, Paus T (2004) Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of Broca’s area. J Cogn Neurosci 16:978–987
Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N (2004) Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems. Biol Psychol 67:299–317
Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N (2005) Correlation between brainstem and cortical auditory processes in normal and language-impaired children. Brain 128:417–423
Woldorff MG, Hillyard SA (1991) Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 79:170–191
Woldorff M, Hansen JC, Hillyard SA (1987) Evidence for effects of selective attention in the mid-latency range of the human auditory event-related potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 40:146–154
Yvert B, Fischer C, Guenot M, Krolak-Salmon P, Isnard J, Pernier J (2002) Simultaneous intracerebral EEG recordings of early auditory thalamic and cortical activity in human. Eur J Neurosci 16:1146–1150
Acknowledgements
NIH R01 DC01510 supported this work. The authors wish to thank their colleagues in the Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory at Northwestern University as well as Dan Zellner and the staff at Northwestern’s Digital Media Studio for their film editing expertise.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Musacchia, G., Sams, M., Nicol, T. et al. Seeing speech affects acoustic information processing in the human brainstem. Exp Brain Res 168, 1–10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0071-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0071-5