Skip to main content
Log in

Interlimb and within limb force coordination in static bimanual manipulation task

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the coordination of hand grip (G) and load force (a force that tends to cause slippage of a grasped object; L) in static bimanual manipulation tasks with the same data obtained from the similar dynamic tasks. Based on the previous findings obtained from dynamic tasks, it was hypothesized that an increase in the rate of L change would be predominantly associated with a decrease in the coordination of the within limb forces (coordination of G and L of each hand as assessed through the correlation coefficients), while a decrease in coordination of interlimb forces (between two G and two L) will be less pronounced. Regarding the pattern of modulation of G, the same increase in L frequency was also expected to be associated with a decrease in G gain and an increase in G offset (as assessed by slope and intercept of the regression lines obtained from G to L diagrams, respectively), as well as with an increase in average G/L ratio. Subjects exerted oscillatory isometric L profiles by simultaneous pulling out two handles of an externally fixed device under an exceptionally wide range of L frequencies (0.67–3.33 Hz). The results demonstrated relatively high correlation coefficients between both the interlimb and within limb forces that were only moderately affected under sub-maximal L frequencies. Furthermore, the hypothesized changes in G gain and offset appeared only under the highest L frequency, while the G/L ratio remained unaffected. We conclude that, when compared with the dynamic tasks based on the unconstrained movements of hand-held objects that produce similar pattern of L change, the static manipulation tasks demonstrate a consistent and highly coordinated pattern of bilateral G and L under a wide range of frequencies. However, the neural mechanisms that play a role in the revealed differences need further elucidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augurelle AS, Smith AM, Lejeune T, Thonnard JL (2003) Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects. J Neurophysiol 89:665–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blank R, Breitenbach A, Nitschke M, Heizer W, Letzgus S, Hermsdorfer J (2001) Human development of grip force modulation relating to cyclic movement-induced inertial loads. Exp Brain Res 138:193–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell RM, Wing AM, Soper HM, Clark KG (2003) Predictive and reactive co-ordination of grip and load forces in bimanual lifting in man. Eur J Neurosci 18:2396–2402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstedt MK, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (1999) Control of grasp stability in humans under different frictional conditions during multidigit manipulation. J Neurophysiol 82:2393–2405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Nurss WK, Ivry RB (2003) The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. J Neurophysiol 90:2409–2418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1993) Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements. Exp Brain Res 95:131–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1995) The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load. Exp Brain Res 105:455–464

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1997) The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci 17:1519–1528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Tresilian J, Wing AM (1993) Coupling of grip force and load force during arm movements with grasped objects. Neurosci Lett 152:53–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilles MA, Wing AM (2003) Age-related changes in grip force and dynamics of hand movement. J Mot Behav 35:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gysin P, Kaminski TR, Gordon AM (2003) Coordination of fingertip forces in object transport during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 149:371–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S, Russell EM, Collins JJ, Marwaha R (2005) Coordination of hand grip and load forces in unidirectional and bidirectional static force production tasks. Neurosci Lett 381:51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JA (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol 246:R1000–R1004

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:229–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Danion F, Latash ML, Li ZM, Zatsiorsky VM (2001) Bilateral deficit and symmetry in finger force production during two-hand multifinger tasks. Exp Brain Res 141:530–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MN, Ridding MC, Flavel SC, Miles TS (2004) Effect of human grip strategy on force control in precision tasks. Exp Brain Res 161(3):368–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monzee J, Lamarre Y, Smith AM (2003) The effects of digital anesthesia on force control using a precision grip. J Neurophysiol 89:672–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DA, Hermsdorfer J, Marquardt C, Fuchs HH (2002) Grip and load force coupling during discrete vertical arm movements with a grasped object in cerebellar atrophy. Exp Brain Res 145:28–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DA, Hermsdorfer J, Marquardt C, Topka H (2003) Moving objects with clumsy fingers: how predictive is grip force control in patients with impaired manual sensibility? Clin Neurophysiol 114:472–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohki Y, Johansson RS (1999) Sensorimotor interactions between pairs of fingers in bimanual and unimanual manipulative tasks. Exp Brain Res 127:43–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrig S, Kazennikov O, Wiesendanger M (1999) Time structure of a goal-directed bimanual skill and its dependence on task constraints. Behav Brain Res 103:95–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Latash ML (1998) A study of a bimanual synergy associated with holding an object. Hum Mov Sci 17:753–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrien DJ, Wiesendanger M (2001a) Bimanual organization of manipulative forces: evidence from erroneous feedforward programming of precision grip. Eur J Neurosci 13:1825–1832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serrien DJ, Wiesendanger M (2001b) Dissociation of grip/load-force coupling during a bimanual manipulative assignment. Exp Brain Res 136:417–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serrien DJ, Wiesendanger M (2001c) A higher-order mechanism overrules the automatic grip-load force constraint during bimanual asymmetrical movements. Behav Brain Res 118:153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serrien DJ, Wiesendanger M (2001d) Regulation of grasping forces during bimanual in-phase and anti-phase coordination. Neuropsychologia 39:1379–1384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers W, Heuer H (1995) Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Quart J Exp Psychol A 48:716–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Steglich C, Heuer H, Spijkers W, Kleinsorge T (1999) Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces. Exp Brain Res 129:302–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen SP, Young DE, Walter CB, Serrien DJ (1991) Control of asymmetrical bimanual movements. Exp Brain Res 85:163–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White O, McIntyre J, Augurelle AS, Thonnard JL (2005) Do novel gravitational environments alter the grip-force/load-force coupling at the fingertips? Exp Brain Res 163(3):324–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Gao F, Latash ML (2004) Motor control goes beyond physics: differential effects of gravity and inertia on finger forces during manipulation of hand-held objects. Exp Brain Res 162(3):300–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported in part by a grant from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (PP1018) and a grant from the University of Delaware Research Foundation to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slobodan Jaric.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaric, S., Collins, J.J., Marwaha, R. et al. Interlimb and within limb force coordination in static bimanual manipulation task. Exp Brain Res 168, 88–97 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0070-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0070-6

Keywords

Navigation