Abstract
When applied over the occipital pole, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) disrupts visual perception and induces phosphenes. Both the underlying mechanisms and the brain structures involved are still unclear. The first part of the study characterizes the suppressive effect of TMS by psychophysical methods. Luminance increment thresholds for orientation discrimination were determined in four subjects using an adaptive staircase procedure. Coil position was controlled with a stereotactic positioning device. Threshold values were modulated by TMS, reaching a maximum effect at a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of approx. 100 ms after visual target presentation. Stronger TMS pulses increased the maximum threshold while decreasing the SOA producing the maximum effect. Slopes of the psychometric function were flattened with TMS masking by a factor of 2, compared to control experiments in the absence of TMS. No change in steepness was observed in experiments using a light flash as the mask instead of TMS. Together with the finding that at higher TMS intensities, threshold elevation occurs even with shorter SOAs, this suggests lasting inhibitory processes as masking mechanisms, contradicting the assumption that the phosphene as excitatory equivalent causes masking. In the companion contribution to this one we present perimetric measurements and phosphene forms as a function of the stimulation site in the brain and discuss the putative generator structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB, Rudell A, Eberle L (1989) Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74:458–462
Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB, Rudell AP, Eberle L (1993) Unmasking human visual perception with the magnetic coil and its relationship to hemispheric asymmetry. Brain Res 605:312–316
Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet I:1106–1107
Beckers G, Hömberg V (1991) Impairment of visual perception and visual short term memory scanning by transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital cortex. Exp Brain Res 87:421–432
Beckers G, Zeki S (1995) The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. Brain 118:49–60
Bolz J, Rosner G, Wässle H (1982) Response latency of brisk-sustained (X) and brisk-transient (Y) cells in the cat retina. J Physiol (Lond) 382:171–190
Corthout E, Uttl B, Walsh V, Hallett M, Cowey A (1999a) Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroreport 10:2631–2634
Corthout E, Uttl B, Ziemann U, Cowey A, Hallett M (1999b) Two periods of processing in the (circum) striate visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 37:137–145
Corthout E, Uttl B, Juan CH, Hallett M, Cowey A (2000) Suppression of vision by transcranial magnetic stimulation: a third mechanism. Neuroreport 11:2345–2349
Dorner-Schandl F, Durst W, Kolling G, Leo-Kottler B (1993) Rasterperimetrie mit dem Tübinger Automatik Perimeter. Universitäts-Augenklinik, Tübingen
Fuhr P, Agostino R, Hallett M (1991) Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81:257–262
Hallett M (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 406:147–150
Hotson J, Braun D, Herzberg W, Boman D (1994) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of extrastriate cortex degrades human motion direction discrimination. Vision Res 34:2115–2123
Inghilleri M, Berardelli A, Cruccu G, Manfredi M (1993) Silent period evoked by transcranial stimulation of the human cortex and cervicomedullary junction. J Physiol (Lond) 466:521–534
Jaskowski P, Pruszewicz A, Swidzinski P (1990) VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction-time distribution. Psychol Res 52:28–34
Kammer T (1999) Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship. Neuropsychologia 37:191–198
Kammer T, Nusseck HG (1998) Are recognition deficits following occipital lobe TMS explained by raised detection thresholds? Neuropsychologia 36:1161–1166
Kammer T, Lehr L, Kirschfeld K (1999) Cortical visual processing is temporally dispersed by luminance in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 263:133–136
Kammer T, Beck S, Thielscher A, Laubis-Herrmann U, Topka H (2001) Motor thresholds in humans. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulseforms, current directions and stimulator types. Clin Neurophysiol 112:250–258
Kammer T, Puls K, Erb M, Grodd W (2004) TMS in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced phosphenes and scotomas. Exp Brain Res (accepted for publication)
Kesten H (1958) Accelerated stochastic-approximation. Ann Math Stat 29:41–59
King-Smith PE, Rose D (1997) Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function. Vision Res 37:1595–1604
Kontsevich LL, Tyler CW (1999) Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Res 39:2729–2737
Lennie P (1981) The physiological basis of variations in visual latency. Vision Res 21:815–824
Mansfield RJ (1973) Latency functions in human vision. Vision Res 13:2219–2234
Masur H, Papke K, Oberwittler C (1993) Suppression of visual perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation—experimental findings in healthy subjects and patients with optic neuritis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 86:259–267
Maunsell JH, Gibson JR (1992) Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 68:1332–1344
Meyer BU, Diehl RR, Steinmetz H, Britton TC, Benecke R (1991) Magnetic stimuli applied over motor cortex and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 43:121–134
Miller MB, Fendrich R, Eliassen JC, Demirel S, Gazzaniga MS (1996) Transcranial magnetic stimulation—delays in visual suppression due to luminance changes. Neuroreport 7:1740–1744
Moliadze V, Zhao Y, Eysel UT, Funke K (2003) Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 553:665–679
Osaka N, Yamamoto M (1978) VEP latency and RT as power functions of luminance in the peripheral visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:785–788
Paulus W, Korinth S, Wischer S, Tergau F (1999) Differential inhibition of chromatic and achromatic perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human visual cortex. Neuroreport 10:1245–1248
Strasburger H (2001) Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field. Percept Psychophys 63:1356–1376
Treutwein B (1995) Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Res 35:2503–2522
Treutwein B, Strasburger H (1999) Fitting the psychometric function. Percept Psychophys 61:87–106
Vaughan HGJ, Costa LD, Gilden L (1966) The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Res 6:645–656
Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001a) The psychometric function. I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63:1293–1313
Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001b) The psychometric function. II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys 63:1314–1329
Acknowledgements
We thank Sandra Beck, Kuno Kirschfeld, and Hans-Günther Nusseck for support and for many fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kammer, T., Puls, K., Strasburger, H. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. I. The psychophysics of visual suppression. Exp Brain Res 160, 118–128 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1991-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1991-1