Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of artificially increased hip and trunk stiffness on balance control in man

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lightweight corsets were used to produce mid-body stiffening, rendering the hip and trunk joints practically inflexible. To examine the effect of this artificially increased stiffness on balance control, we perturbed the upright stance of young subjects (20–34 years of age) while they wore one of two types of corset or no corset at all. One type, the “half-corset”, only increased hip stiffness, and the other, the “full-corset”, increased stiffness of the hips and trunk. The perturbations consisted of combined roll and pitch rotations of the support surface (7.5 deg, 60 deg/s) in one of six different directions. Outcome measures were biomechanical responses of the legs, trunk, arms and head, and electromyographic (EMG) responses from leg, trunk, and upper arm muscles. With the full-corset, a decrease in forward stabilising trunk pitch rotation compared to the no-corset condition occurred for backward pitch tilts of the support surface. In contrast, the half-corset condition yielded increased forward trunk motion. Trunk backward pitch motion after forwards support-surface perturbations was the same for all corset conditions. Ankle torques and lower leg angle changes in the pitch direction were decreased for both corset conditions for forward pitch tilts of the support-surface but unaltered for backward tilts. Changes in trunk roll motion with increased stiffness were profound. After onset of a roll support-surface perturbation, the trunk rolled in the opposite direction to the support-surface tilt for the no-corset and half-corset conditions, but in the same direction as the tilt for the full-corset condition. Initial head roll angular accelerations (at 100 ms) were larger for the full-corset condition but in the same direction (opposite platform tilt) for all conditions. Arm roll movements were initially in the same direction as trunk movements, and were followed by large compensatory arm movements only for the full-corset condition. Leg muscle (soleus, peroneus longus, but not tibialis anterior) balance-correcting responses were reduced for roll and pitch tilts under both corset conditions. Responses in paraspinals were also reduced. These results indicate that young healthy normals cannot rapidly modify movement strategies sufficiently to account for changes in link flexibility following increases in hip and trunk stiffness. The changes in leg and trunk muscle responses failed to achieve a normal roll or pitch trunk end position at 700 ms (except for forward tilt rotations), even though head accelerations and trunk joint proprioception seemed to provide information on changed trunk movement profiles over the first 300 ms following the perturbation. The major adaptation to stiffness involved increased use of arm movements to regain stability. The major differences in trunk motion for the no-corset, half-corset and full-corset conditions support the concept of a multi-link pendulum with different control dynamics in the pitch and roll planes as a model of human stance. Stiffening of the hip and trunk increases the likelihood of a loss of balance laterally and/or backwards. Thus, these results may have implications for the elderly and others, with and without disease states, who stiffen for a variety of reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accornero N, Capozza M, Rinalduzzi S, Manfredi GW (1997) Clinical multisegmental posturography: age-related changes in stance control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105:213–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allum JHJ, Adkin AL (2003) Improvements in trunk sway observed for stance and gait tasks during recovery from an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. Audiol Neurootol 8:286–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allum JHJ, Honegger F (1998) Interactions between vestibular and proprioceptive inputs triggering and modulating human balance-correcting responses differ across muscles. Exp Brain Res 121:478–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allum JH, Honegger F, Schicks H (1993) Vestibular and proprioceptive modulation of postural synergies in normal subjects. J Vestib Res Spring 3:59–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allum JHJ, Carpenter MG, Honegger F, Adkin AL, Bloem BR (2002) Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man. J Physiol 542:643–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allum JHJ, Carpenter MG, Honegger F (2003) Directional sensitivity of balance corrections in normal and vestibular loss subjects. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 22:37–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aramaki Y, Nozaki D, Masani K, Sato T, Nakazawa K, Yaro H (2001) Reciprocal angular acceleration of the ankle and hip joints during quiet standing in humans. Exp Brain Res 136:463–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloem BR, Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Honegger F (2000) Is lower leg proprioception essential for triggering human automatic postural responses? Exp Brain Res 130:375–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloem BR, Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Verschuuren JJ, Honegger F (2002) Triggering of balance corrections and compensatory strategies in a patient with total leg proprioceptive loss. Exp Brain Res 142:91–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter MG, Allum JH, Honegger F (1999) Directional sensitivity of stretch reflexes and balance corrections for normal subjects in the roll and pitch planes. Exp Brain Res 129:93–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter MG, Allum JH, Honegger F (2001) Vestibular influences on human postural control in combinations of pitch and roll planes reveal differences in spatiotemporal processing. Exp Brain Res 140:95–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter MG, Allum JHJ, Honegger F, Adkin AL, Bloem BR (2004) Postural abnormalities to multidirectional stance perturbations in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (in press)

  • Cordo PJ, Nashner LM (1982) Properties of postural adjustments associated with rapid arm movements. J Neurophysiol 47:287–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick RC, Taylor JL, McCloskey DI (1992) Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components. J Physiol 454:533–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick R, Rogers DK, McCloskey DI (1994) Stable human standing with lower-limb muscle afferents providing the only sensory input. J Physiol 480:395–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gatev P, Thomas S, Kepple T, Hallett M (1999) Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults. J Physiol 514:915–928

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geursen JB, Altena D, Massen CH, Verduin M (1976) A model of the standing man for the description of his dynamic behaviour. Agressologie 17 Spec No:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles M, Wing AM, Kirker SG (1999) Lateral balance organisation in human stance in response to a random or predictable perturbation. Exp Brain Res 124:137–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Kiel DP, Parker RA, Hayes WC, Resnick NM (1998) Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly. Am J Med 104:539–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grin L (2003) The effects of voluntary arm raises on the recovery from unexpected rotational perturbations. Master’s Thesis in Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Canada

  • Henry SM, Fung J, Horak FB (1998a) EMG responses to maintain stance during multidirectional surface translations. J Neurophysiol 80:1939–1950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henry SM, Fung J, Horak FB (1998b) Control of stance during lateral and anterior/posterior surface translations. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 6:32–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55:1369–1381

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horak FB, Nashner LM, Diener HC (1990) Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 82:167–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horak FB, Henry SM, Shumway-Cook A (1997) Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. Phys Ther 77:517–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs R (1997) Control model of human stance using fuzzy logic. Biol Cybern 77:63–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson R, Magnusson M (1991) Optimal coordination and control of posture and locomotion. Math Biosci 103:203–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keshner EA, Allum JHJ, Pfaltz CR (1987) Postural coactivation and adaptation in the sway stabilizing responses of normals and patients with bilateral vestibular deficit. Exp Brain Res 69:77–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo AD (1995) An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42:87–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo AD, Zajac FE (1993) Human standing posture: multi-joint movement strategies based on biomechanical constraints. Prog Brain Res 97:349–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauk M, Chow CC, Lipsitz LA, Mitchell SL, Collins JJ (1999) Assessing muscle stiffness from quiet stance in Parkinson’s disease. Muscle Nerve 22:635–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loram ID, Lakie M (2002) Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: position control by small, ballistic-like, throw and catch movements. J Physiol 540:1111–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki BE, McIlroy WE (1997) The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the “change-in-support” strategy. Phys Ther 77:488–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK (1994a) A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol 49:M72–M84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki BE, McIlroy WE, Perry SO (1994b) Compensatory responses to multidirectional perturbations. In: Taguchi K, Igarashi M, Mori S (eds) Vestibular and neural front. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 437–440

  • McIlroy WE, Maki BE (1995) Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance. Neurosci Lett 184:177–180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SP, Rushmer DS, Windus SL, Nashner LM (1988) Human automatic postural responses: responses to horizontal perturbations of stance in multiple directions. Exp Brain Res 73:648–658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morasso PG, Sanguineti V (2002) Ankle muscle stiffness alone cannot stabilize balance during quiet standing. J Neurophysiol 88:2157–2162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nashner LM, McCollum G (1985) The organization of human postural movements: a formal basis and experimental synthesis. Behav Brain Sci 8:135–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1993) Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 41:1226–1234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterka RJ (2002) Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 88:1097–1118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rietdyk S, Patla AE, Winter DA, Ishac MG, Little CE (1999) NACOB presentation CSB New Investigator Award. Balance recovery from medio-lateral perturbations of the upper body during standing. North American Congress on Biomechanics. J Biomech 32:1149–1158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runge CF, Shupert CL, Horak FB, Zajac FE (1999) Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait Posture 10:161–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA, Prince F, Frank JS, Powell C, Zabjek KF (1996) Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance. J Neurophysiol 75:2334–2343

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak K (1998) Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol 80:1211–1221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Research Foundation (31.59319.99) to J.H.J. Allum, a grant from the Dutch Stichting St. Anna Fonds to C. Grüneberg, and a grant from the Dr. Jan Meerwaldt Stichting to B.R. Bloem. We thank Ms. U. Feisst for typographic assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H. J. Allum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grüneberg, C., Bloem, B.R., Honegger, F. et al. The influence of artificially increased hip and trunk stiffness on balance control in man. Exp Brain Res 157, 472–485 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1861-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1861-x

Keywords

Navigation