Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 155, Issue 2, pp 261–264 | Cite as

Unconscious modulation of motor cortex excitability revealed with transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • Hugo ThéoretEmail author
  • Erin Halligan
  • Masahito Kobayashi
  • Lotfi Merabet
  • Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Research Note

Abstract.

The neuronal effects of sensory events that do not enter conscious awareness have been reported in numerous pathological conditions and in normal subjects. In the present study, unconscious modulation of corticospinal excitability was probed in healthy volunteers with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected from the first dorsal interosseus muscle while subjects performed a masked semantic priming task that has been shown to elicit covert motor cortex activations. Our data show that the amplitude of the MEPs is modulated by an unseen prime, in line with temporal patterns revealed with event related potentials. These data confirm previous reports showing specific motor neural responses associated with an unseen visual stimulus and establish TMS as a valuable tool in the study of the neural correlates of consciousness.

Keywords

Consciousness TMS Motor cortex Semantic priming Masking 

Notes

Acknowledgements.

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the National Alliance for Autism Research (HT) and the National Institutes of Health (APL).

References

  1. Crick F, Koch C (2003) A framework for consciousness. Nat Neurosci 6:119–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dehaene S, Naccache L, Le Clec’H G, Koechlin E, Mueller M, Dehaene-Lambertz G, van de Moortele PF, Le Bihan D (1998) Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature 395:597–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dehaene S, Naccache L, Cohen L, Bihan DL, Mangin JF, Poline JB, Riviere D (2001) Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nat Neurosci 4:752–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Enns JT, Di Lollo V (2000) What’s new in visual masking? Trends Cogn Sci 4:345–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E (1997) Neglect: clinical and anatomic aspects. In: Feinberg TE, Farah MJ (eds) Behavioural neurology and neuropsychology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 309–317Google Scholar
  6. Kanwisher N (2001) Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition 79:91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 471:510–519Google Scholar
  8. Lamme VA (2002) Blindsight: the role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections. Acta Psychol (Amst) 107:209–228Google Scholar
  9. Naccache L, Dehaene S (2001a) The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cereb Cortex 11:966–974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Naccache L, Dehaene S (2001b) Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition 80:215–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rees G, Wojciulik E, Clarke K, Husain M, Frith C, Driver J (2000) Unconscious activation of visual cortex in the damaged right hemisphere of a parietal patient with extinction. Brain 123:1624–1633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sahraie A, Weiskrantz L, Barbur JL, Simmons A, Williams SC, Brammer MJ (1997) Pattern of neuronal activity associated with conscious and unconscious processing of visual signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:9406–9411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vuilleumier P, Sagiv N, Hazeltine E, Poldrack RA, Swick D, Rafal RD, Gabrieli JD (2001) Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: a combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:3495–3500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Weiskrantz L (1986) Blindsight: a case study and its implications. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Théoret
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Erin Halligan
    • 1
  • Masahito Kobayashi
    • 1
  • Lotfi Merabet
    • 1
  • Alvaro Pascual-Leone
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Magnetic Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Département de psychologie and Hôpital Ste-JustineUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations