Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 154, Issue 2, pp 211–217 | Cite as

The role of motor imagery in learning a totally novel movement

  • Theo Mulder
  • Sjouke Zijlstra
  • Wiebren Zijlstra
  • Jacqueline Hochstenbach
Research Article

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to gain more insight into the mechanisms underlying mental practice. The question of whether a totally novel movement may be learned by mental practice was investigated. Healthy young adults had to learn the abduction of the big toe (dominant right foot) without moving the other toes or the foot. The subjects were divided into two groups: subjects who were absolutely unable to abduct their big toe ("absolute zero" group) and subjects who were able to abduct their toe to some extent but showed clear room for improvement ("already doing it" group). Two separate experiments were executed. In the first experiment, 37 absolute-zero subjects had to practice, mentally or physically, the target movement. In the second experiment 40 already-doing-it subjects had to improve their toe-abduction skill. The results showed that absolute-zero subjects could not acquire the toe-abduction movement by means of mental practice. Only subjects who physically practiced the target movement improved significantly. Subjects who had some experience in the task (already-doing-it subjects) improved significantly after mental practice as well as after physical practice. The results seem to indicate that it is more plausible to explain the learning effects of mental practice in terms of a "top-down" mechanism based on the activation of a central representation of the movement than in terms of a peripheral "bottom-up" mechanism based on the activation of muscles.

Keywords

Mental practice Motor imagery Motor learning 

References

  1. Abbruzzese G, Trompetto C, Schieppati M (1996) The excitability of the human motor cortex increases during execution and mental imagination of sequential but not repetitive finger movements. Exp Brain Res 111:465–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker FC, Boschker MSJ, Chung T (1996) Changes in muscular activity while imagining weight lifting using stimulus or response propositions. J Sport Exerc Psychol 18:313–324Google Scholar
  3. Boschker MSJ (2001) Action-based imagery: on the nature of mentally imagined motor actions. Free University Doctoral thesis, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Crammond DJ (1997) Motor Imagery: never in your wildest dream. Trends Neurosci 20:54–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Decety J (1996) The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 77:45–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Decety J, Grèzes J (1999) Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci 3:172–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Decety J, Jeannerod M, Germain M, Pastene J (1991) Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to imagined effort. Behav Brain Res 42:1–5Google Scholar
  8. Decety J, Jeannerod M, Durozard D, Baverel G (1993) Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man. J Physiol (Lond) 461:549–563Google Scholar
  9. Driskell JE, Copper C, Moran A (1994) Does mental practice enhance performance? J Sport Psychol 79:481–492Google Scholar
  10. Elias LJ, Bryden MP, Bulman-Flemming MB (1998) Footedness is a better predictor than handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia 36:37–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fansler CL, Poff CL, Shepard KF (1985) Effects of mental practice on the balance in elderly women. Phys Ther 65:1332–1338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Feltz DL, Landers DM (1983) The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a meta-analysis. J Sport Psychol 5:25–57Google Scholar
  13. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehéricy et al. (2000) Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex 10:1093–1104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hale BD (1982) The effects of internal and external imagery on muscular and ocular concomitants. J Sport Exerc Psychol 4:379–387Google Scholar
  15. Hall C, Bernoties L, Schmidt D (1995) Interference effects of mental imagery on a motor task. Br J Psychol 86:181–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanakawa T, Immisch I, Toma K et al. (2003) Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. J Neurophysiol 89:989–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Isaac AR, Marks DF, Russell DG (1986) An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J Mental Imagery 10:23–30Google Scholar
  18. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J (2001) Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehab 82:133–1141Google Scholar
  19. Jacobson E (1932) Electrophysiology of mental activities. Am J Psychol 44:677–694.Google Scholar
  20. Jeannerod M (1994) The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17:187–245Google Scholar
  21. Jeannerod M (1995) Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychology 33:1419–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeannerod M, Decety J (1995) Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Curr OpinNeurobiol 5:727–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson SH (2000) Imaging the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics. Neuroreport 11:729–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson SH, Spreh G, Saykin AJ (2002) Intact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: evidence for activity-independent action representations. J Cogn Neurosci 14:841–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jowdy DP, Harris DV (1990) Muscular responses during mental imagery as a function of motor skill level. J Sport Exerc Psychol 12:91–201Google Scholar
  26. Livesay JR, Samras MR (1998) Covert neuromuscular activity of the dominant forearm during visualization of a motor task. Percept Mot Skills 86:371–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lotze M, Montoya P, Erb M et al. (1999) Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 11:491–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mackay DG (1981) The problem of rehearsal or mental practice. J Mot Behav 13:274–285Google Scholar
  29. Magill RA (1998) Motor learning: concepts and applications. MacGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulder Th, Hulstijn W (1985a) Sensory feedback and the learning of a novel motor task. J Mot Behav 17:110–128Google Scholar
  31. Mulder Th, Hulstijn W (1985b) Delayed sensory feedback and the learning of a novel motor task. Psychol Res 47:203–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Naito E, Kochiyama T, Kitada R et al. (2002) Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical areas and the cerebellum. J Neurosci 22:3683–3691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Page SJ (2000) Imagery improves upper extremity motor function in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Occup Ther J Res 20:200–215Google Scholar
  34. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto A, Johnston MV (2001) Mental practice combined with physical practice for upper-limb motor deficit in subacute stroke. Phys Ther 81:1455–1462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pascual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen L et al. (1995) Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol 74:1037–1045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V et al. (1996) Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 16:7688–7698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson A (1969) Mental imagery. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (1999) Motor control and learning: a behavioural emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  39. Shaw W (1940) The relation of muscular action potentials to imaginal weightlifting. Arch Psychol 35:5–50Google Scholar
  40. Warner L, McNeill ME (1988) Mental imagery and its potential for physical therapy. Phys Ther 68:516–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wehner T, Vogt S, Stadler M (1984) Task-specific EMG characteristics during mental training. Psychol Res 46:389–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Weiss T, Hansen E, Beyer L et al. (1994) Activation during mental practice in stroke patients. Int J Psychophysiol 17:91–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yue G, Cole KJ (1992) Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol 67:1115–1123Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theo Mulder
    • 1
  • Sjouke Zijlstra
    • 1
  • Wiebren Zijlstra
    • 1
  • Jacqueline Hochstenbach
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Human Movement SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Brain Damage Aftercare, Department of RehabilitationUniversity Hospital and University of GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations