Skip to main content
Log in

Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the effect of spatial uncertainty on motor planning by using the cueing method in a reaching task (experiment 1). Discrete spatial cues indicated the different locations in which the target could be presented. The number of cues as well as their direction changed from trial to trial. We tested the adequacy of two models of motor planning to account for the data. The switching model assumes that only one motor response can be planned at a time, whereas the capacity-sharing model assumes that multiple motor responses can be planned in parallel. Both models predict the same relation between average reaction time (RT) and number of cues, but they differ in their prediction of the shape of the distribution of the reaction time. The results showed that RT increased with the number of cues independently from their spatial dispersion. This relation was well described by the function predicted by both models, whereas it was poorly described by the Hick-Hyman law. In addition, the distribution of RT conformed to the prediction of the capacity-sharing model and not to that of the switching model. We investigated the role that the requirement of a spatially directed motor response might have had on this pattern of results by testing subjects in a simple RT task (experiment 2) with the same cueing presentation as in experiment 1. The results contrasted with those in experiment 1 and showed that RT was dependent on the spatial dispersion of the cues and not on their number. The results of the two experiments suggest that the mode of processing of potential targets is dependent on the spatial constraints of the task. The processing resources can be either divided relative to the spatial distribution of possible targets or across multiple independent discrete representations of these targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4A, B.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander GE (1987) Selective neuronal discharge in monkey putamen reflects intended direction of planned limb movements. Exp Brain Res 67:623–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basso MA, Wurtz RH (1998) Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes of target probability. J Neurosci 15:7519–7534

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian A, Riehle A, Erlhagen W, Schöner G (1998) Prior information preshapes the population representation of movement direction in motor cortex. Neuroreport 9:315–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia Mayer A, Ferraina S, Marconi B, Bullis JB, Lacquaniti F, Burnod Y, Baraduc P, Caminiti R (1998) Early motor influences on visuomotor transformations for reaching: a positive image of optic ataxia. Exp Brain Res 123:172–189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein IH, Schurman DL, Forester G (1967) Choice reaction time as a function of stimulus uncertainty, response uncertainty, and behavioral hypotheses. J Exp Psychol 74:517–524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock O, Arnold K (1992) Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets. Exp Brain Res 90:209–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock O, Eversheim U (2000) The mechanisms of movement preparation: a precuing study. Behav Brain Res 108:85–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard RW, Irby TS, Fitts PM, Alluisi EA (1962) Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information. J Exp Psychol 63:105–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent DE, Gregory M (1965) On the interaction of S-R compatibility with other variables affecting reaction time. Br J Psychol 56:61–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carey DP (2000) Eye-hand coordination: eye to hand or hand to eye? Curr Biol 10: R416–R419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U (2001) The effects of abrupt onset of 2-D and 3-D distractors on prehension movements. Percept Psychophys 63:1014–1025

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2002) Simultaneous encoding of multiple potential reach directions in dorsal premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol 87:1149–1154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dassonville P, Lewis SM, Foster HE, Ashe J (1999) Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection. Cogn Brain Res 7:235–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50:1096–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen CW, Yeh YY (1985) Allocation of attention in the visual field. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:583–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Evarts EV, Tanji J (1976) Reflex and intended responses in motor cortex pyramidal tract neurons of monkey. J Neurophysiol 39:1069–1080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M (1996) Reaching movements: programming time course is independent of choice number. Neuroreport 7:2629–2634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M (2002) Reaching movements: mode of motor programming influences programming itself. Exp Brain Res 144:414–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Peterson JR (1964) Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67:103–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Peterson JR, Wolpe G (1963) Cognitive aspects of information processing: II. Adjustments to stimulus redundancy. J Exp Psychol 65:423–432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C (2000) Vincentization revisited. Ann Stat 20:1137–1142

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Favilla M, Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Bermejo R, Pullman S (1997) Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories. Exp Brain Res 115:217–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hick WE (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 4:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman R (1953) Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J Exp Psychol 45:188–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger D, Gilman S, Aldridge JW (1993) Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement. Exp Brain Res 95:51–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D (1999) Effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on visually guided hand movements. Cogn Brain Res 8:143–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JA (1959) Tactual choice reactions: I. Q J Exp Psychol 11:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth LE, El-Zahhar N, Alcorn MB (1985) Exceptions to Hick's law: explorations with a response duration measure. J Exp Psychol Gen 114:417–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD (1986) Response times. Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford Science Publications, New York

  • Mardia KV, Jupp PE (2000) Directional statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

  • Pellizzer G, Georgopoulos AP (1993) Common processing constraints for visuomotor and visual mental rotations. Exp Brain Res 93:165–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzer G, Sargent P, Georgopoulos P (1995) Motor cortical activity in a context-recall task. Science 269:702–705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podgorny P, Shepard RN (1983) Distribution of visual attention over space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 9:380–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prut Y, Fetz EE (1999) Primate spinal interneurons show pre-movement instructed delay activity. Nature 401:590–594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff R (1979) Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychol Bull 86:446–461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff R (1993) Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychol Bull 114:510–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:444–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw ML (1978) A capacity allocation model for reaction time. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4:586–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman and Co, New York

  • Teichner WH, Krebs, MJ (1974) Laws of choice reaction time. Psychol Rev 81:75–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper SP, Howard LA, Houghton G (1998) Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:1385–1393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis S, Jonides J (1996) Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:1505–1513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis S, Meyer DE, Smith JEK (1991) Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. Psychol Bull 110:350–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Pellizzer.

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Ramon R. Villanueva for participating in the collection of part of the data and Bagrat Amirikian for comments on a previous version of the manuscript

This research was supported by a Merit Review Award from the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellizzer, G., Hedges, J.H. Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues. Exp Brain Res 150, 276–289 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1453-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1453-1

Keywords

Navigation