Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 12 June 2003

Abstract.

In a previous comparative study with migraineurs, we found in 24 normal subjects that the amplitude of the pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEP) in the first block of 100 responses and its habituation over 6 sequential blocks were significantly decreased after 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), while 10 Hz rTMS had no significant effect. We report here our results on the reproducibility of the rTMS effect studied in ten of these subjects by repeating the recordings for each frequency three times on different days. We have also reanalysed the data obtained in 24 normal subjects, looking separately at the results in those stimulated at an intensity equal to phosphene threshold (group 1; n=14) and those stimulated at 110% of motor threshold because of unelicitable phosphenes (group 2; n=10). We finally determined the precise duration of the rTMS effect. Despite some interindividual variability, the effects of both rTMS frequencies on first block amplitude, habituation between first and sixth block and habituation slope over the six blocks were highly reproducible. The only difference between the two groups of subjects was the effect of 1 Hz rTMS on the second measured PR-VEP component. Whereas first block amplitude of the first P1-N1 component and habituation were decreased in both groups, such a decrease was found for the second P1-N2 component only in group 1 stimulated at phosphene threshold. The dishabituation of the N1-P1 component after 1 Hz rTMS was maximal at 15 min, but lasted up to 33 min, while that of P1-N2 disappeared after 3 min. There was a non-significant trend (p=0.06) for a reduction of first block amplitude after 10 Hz rTMS in the total group of subjects, but no effect on habituation. The inhibitory effect of 1 Hz rTMS, which reduces in healthy controls both first block PR-VEP amplitude and habituation, probably by decreasing the preactivation excitability level of the underlying visual cortex, is thus reproducible and long lasting. Long trains of 10 Hz rTMS tend to attenuate reproducibly the cortical preactivation level in normal subjects, but they do not affect habituation at all, which contrasts with their effect in migraineurs, in whom, as previously reported, they significantly correct the habituation deficit. The absence of an effect of 1 Hz rTMS on PR-VEP P1-N2 in subjects stimulated at 110% of motor threshold may be explained by the deeper anatomical location of the cortical generators of this component and the lower stimulation intensity used. Taken together our results confirm that the effect of rTMS on the underlying cortex depends on several variables such as frequency, intensity and level of cortical preactivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Áfra J, Cecchini AP, De Pasqua V, Albert A, Schoenen J (1998a) Visual evoked potentials during long periods of pattern-reversal stimulation in migraine. Brain 121:233–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Áfra J, Mascia A, Gerard P, Maertens de Noordhout A, Schoenen J (1998b) Interictal cortical excitability in migraine: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor and visual cortices. Ann Neurol 44:209–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aurora SK, Ahmad BK, Welch KM, Bhardhwaj P, Ramadan NM (1998) Transcranial magnetic stimulation confirms hyperexcitability of occipital cortex in migraine. Neurology 50:1111–1114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogacz P, Vanzulli A, Handler D, Garcia Austt E (1970) Evoked potentials in man. II. Habituation of visual evoked responses. Acta Neurol Latinoamericana 3:353–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohotin V, Fumal A, Vandenheede M, Gerard P, Bohotin C, Maertens de Noordhout A, Schoenen J (2002) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in migraine. Brain 125:912–922

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boroojerdi B, Prager A, Muellbacher W, Cohen LG (2000a) Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 54:1529–1531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boroojerdi B, Bushara KO, Corwell B, Immisch I, Battaglia F, Muellbacher W, Cohen LG (2000b) Enhanced excitability of the human visual cortex induced by short-term light deprivation. Cereb Cortex 10:529–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt SA, Brocke J, Röricht S, Ploner CJ, Villringer A, Meyer BU (2001) In vivo assessment of human visual system connectivity with transcranial electrical stimulation during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 14:366–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1997a) Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 48:1398–1403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Gerloff C, Classen J, Wassermann EM, Hallet M, Cohen LG (1997b) Safety of different inter-train intervals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and recommendations for safe ranges of stimulation parameters. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105:415–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Russo F, Martinez A, Sereno MI, Pitzalis S, Hillyard SA (2002) Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potentials. Hum Brain Mapp 15:95–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enomoto H, Ugawa Y, Hanajima R, Yuasa K, Mochizuki H, Terao Y, Shiio Y, Furubayashi T, Iwata NK, Kanazawa I (2001) Decreased sensory cortical excitability after 1 Hz rTMS over the ipsilateral primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 112:2154–2158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fierro B, Piazza A, Brighina F, La Bua V, Buffa D, Oliveri M (2001) Modulation of intracortical inhibition induced by low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 138:452–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox P, Ingham R, George MS, Mayberg H, Ingham J, Roby J, Martin C, Jerabek P (1997) Imaging human intra-cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS. Neuroreport 8:2787–2791

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschlager W, Siebner HR, Rothwell JC (2001) Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex. Neurology 57:449–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton RH, Pascual-Leone A (1998) Cortical plasticity associated with Braille learning. Trends Cogn Sci 2:168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel ER (1992) Cellular mechanisms of learning and biological basis of individuality. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (eds) Principles of neurol science. Elsevier, New York, 1009–1031

  • Knott JR, Irwin DA (1973) Anxiety, stress and the contingent negative variation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 29:538–541

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn SM, Pascual-Leone A, Felician O, Camposano S, Keenan JP, Thompson WL, Ganis G, Sukel KE, Alpert NM (1999) The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. Science 284:167–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda F, Keenan J, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A (2000) Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 111:800–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Megela AL, Teyler TJ (1979) Habituation of the human evoked potential. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:1154–1170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesulam MM (1990) Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention language and memory. Ann Neurol 28:597–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Modugno N, Nakamura Y, MacKinnon CD, Filipovic SR, Bestman S, Berardelli A, Rothwell JC (2001) Motor cortex excitability following short trains of repetitive magnetic stimuli. Exp Brain Res 140:453–459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Wassermann EM, Hallet M (1994) Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 117:847–858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paus T, Castro-Alamancos MA, Petrides M (2001) Cortico-cortical connectivity of the human mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex and its modulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 14:1405–1411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peinemann A, Lehner C, Mentschel C, Münchau A, Conrad B, Siebner HR (2000) Subthreshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human primary motor cortex reduces intracortical paired-pulse inhibition. Neurosci Lett 296:21–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romero JF, Anschel D, Sparing R, Gangitano M, Pascual-Leone P (2002) Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 113:101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sándor PS, Áfra J, Proietti-Cecchini A, Albert A, Schoenen J (1999) Familial influences on cortical evoked potentials in migraine. Neuroreport 10:1235–1238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sappey-Marinier D, Calabrese G, Fein G, Hugg JW, Biggins C, Weiner MW (1992) Effect of photic stimulation on human visual cortex lactate and phosphates using 1H and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 12:584–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenen J (1996) Deficient habituation of evoked cortical potentials in migraine: a link between brain biology, behavior and trigeminovascular activation? Biomed Pharmacother 50:71–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenen J, Wang W, Albert A, Delwaide PJ (1995) Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Eur J Neurol 2:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigeto H, Tobimatsu S, Yamamoto T, Kobayashi T, Kato M (1998) Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: a study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145. J Neurol Sci 156:186–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MJ, Keel JC, Greenberg BD, Adams LF, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DA, Wassermann EM (1999) Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability. Neurology 53:2069–2072

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speer AM, Kimbrell TA, Wassermann EMD, Repella J, Willis MW, Herscovitch P, Post RM (2000) Opposite effects of high and low frequency rTMS on regional brain activity in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry 48:1133–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Sommer M, Tergau F, Paulus W (2000) Lasting influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 287:37–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

This study was supported by grant no. 3.4523.00 from the Belgian Fund for Medical Research (Brussels) and grant no. 125 from the Migraine Trust (London) to J.S. V.B. is the recipient of a Clinical Fellowship of the International Headache Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Schoenen.

Additional information

A. Fumal and V. Bohotin contributed equally to this study

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1533-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fumal, A., Bohotin, V., Vandenheede, M. et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 150, 332–340 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1423-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1423-7

Keywords

Navigation