Abstract
It is shown that the account for final state interactions between the two electrons ejected from the atomic K shell during electromagnetic transitions of nucleons removes the existing discrepancy between theoretical predictions and experimental data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y. Isozumi, Nuclear Instr. and Methods in Phys. Research, A280, 151 (1989)
E. G. Drukarev and M. I. Strikman, Phys. Rev. Lett. B186, 1 (1987)
E. G. Drukarev and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Nucl. Phys. A518, 513 (1990)
R. G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. 57, 194 (1940)
M. A. Listengarten, Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. Phys. -Chem. 16, 142 (1962)
J. Eichler, Z. Phys. 160, 333 (1960)
D. P. Grechukhin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4, 354 (1967)
D. P. Grechukhin, Nucl. Phys. 62, 273 (1965); I. V. Kopytin, V. A. Gvozdenko, Bull. Akad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Ser. 38, 2657 (1974)
A. Grabovski, S. Gustafsson, G. Bäckström, Nucl. Phys. 38, 648 (1962); K. Knauf, T. Sommer, Z. Phys. 183, 10 (1965); H. J. Fishbeck, R. F. Petry, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 14, 569 (1966); V. K. Basenko, A. N. Berlizov, G. A. Prokopetz, Bull. Russ. Akad. Sci., Ser. Phys. 57, 61 (1993)
F. T. Porter, M. S. Freedman, F. Wagner Jr., Phys. Rev. C3, 2246 (1971)
T. Mukoyama and S. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. C11, 1353 (1975); 13, 377 (1976)
E. G. Drukarev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 21, 308 (1975)
F. W. Byron Jr. and C. J. Joachain, Phys. Rev. 164, 1 (1967)
M. Ya. Amusia, E. G. Drukarev, V. G. Gorshkov, M. P. Kazachkov, Journ. Phys. B8, 1248 (1975)
R. L. Lopez and L. Durand, Phys. Rev. C37, 535 (1988)
E. G. Drukarev, Nucl. Phys. A541, 131 (1992)
J. P. Briand, P. Chevalier, A. Johnson, J. P. Rozet, M. Tavernier and A. Tonati, X-72 Proceedings, Atlanta, 1972, p. 1940
C. W. E. van Eijk, J. Wijnhorst and M. A. Popelier, Phys. Rev. A24, 854 (1981)
A. Ljubicic, M. Jurcevic, K. Ilakovac, B. Hrastnik, Phys. Rev. C3, 831 (1971)
J. P. Briand, P. Chovallier, A. Johnson, J. P. Rozet, M. Tavernier and A. Tonati, Phys. Lett. 49A, 51 (1974)
H. J. Nagy, G. Schupp and R. R. Hurst, Phys. Rev. C11, 205 (1975)
C. W. E. van Eijk, J. Wijmhorst and M. A. Popelier, Phys. Rev. C19, 1047 (1979)
K. Knauf, T. Sommer and H. Klewe-Nebenias, Z. Phys. 197, 101 (1966)
Note different meanings attributed to the term double conversion. In [5] and [12] it is used for the whole process of double ejection. However in [1] and [11] it denotes the ejection by two-quantum nuclear transition only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drukarev, E.G. Final state interaction as the main mechanism of double hole creation in atomic K shells during electromagnetic nuclear decays. Z Phys A - Particles and Fields 359, 133–136 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002180050378
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002180050378