Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revealing the differences in volatile flavor compounds between traditional and modern industrial soy sauce from China and Japan through GC × GC-TOF–MS, chemometrics and sensory analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soy sauce, being a conventional condiment known for its rich flavor, has the ability to enhance the flavor of food and satisfy people's pursuits for a more enjoyable culinary experience. Consequently, it is extensively utilized in Asian cuisine. A comprehensive strategy was employed in this study, which involved multivariate statistical analysis, sensory analysis and chemical analysis of soy sauce from three production processes. Sensory analysis revealed that three types of sauce were significantly different in floral, fruity and nutty/baked aromas. Through GC × GC-TOF–MS analysis, a total of 358 potential aroma compounds were identified, among which 35 compounds were identified as markers for distinguishing the three types of soy sauce. Pyrazines were abundant in Chinese traditional-type soy sauce, while esters were predominant in Japanese soy sauce. The potential relationship between aroma compounds and aroma characteristics of soy sauce produced through three different processes was investigated. This study provides theoretical insights aimed at enhancing the quality of brewed soy sauce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its additional files.

References

  1. Devanthi PVP, Gkatzionis K (2019) Soy sauce fermentation: microorganisms, aroma formation, and process modification. Food Res Int 120:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Diez-Simon C, Eichelsheim C, Mumm R, Hall RD (2020) Chemical and sensory characteristics of soy sauce: a review. J Agric Food Chem 68(42):11612–11630. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng Y, Zhou T, Wu W et al (2021) Research progress on flavor and functional components of soy sauce. J Food Sci Technol 39(4):14–28. https://doi.org/10.12301/j.issn.2095-6002.2021.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li J, Zhang M, Feng X, Ding T, Zhao Y, Sun C, Zhou S, He J, Wang C (2022) Characterization of fragrant compounds in different types of high-salt liquid-state fermentation soy sauce from China. Lwt Food Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang S, Tamura T, Kyouno N et al (2019) Effect of volatile compounds on the quality of Japanese fermented soy sauce. Lwt-Food Sci Technol 111:594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng Y, Su G, Zhao H et al (2015) Characterisation of aroma profiles of commercial soy sauce by odour activity value and omission test. Food Chem 167:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang X, Guo M, Song H, Meng Q (2020) Characterization of key aroma compounds in traditional Chinese soy sauce through the molecular sensory science technique. Lwt-Food Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stefanuto P-H, Smolinska A, Focant J-F (2021) Advanced chemometric and data handling tools for GC×GC-TOF-MS: application of chemometrics and related advanced data handling in chemical separations. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 139:116251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao G, Ding L-L, Hadiatullah H, Li S, Wang X, Yao Y, Liu J, Jiang S (2020) Characterization of the typical fragrant compounds in traditional Chinese-type soy sauce. Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasheed DM, Serag A, Abdel Shakour ZT, Farag M (2021) Novel trends and applications of multidimensional chromatography in the analysis of food, cosmetics and medicine bearing essential oils. Talanta 223:121710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Song X, Jing S, Zhu L, Ma C, Song T, Wu J, Zhao Q, Zheng F, Zhao M, Chen F (2020) Untargeted and targeted metabolomics strategy for the classification of strong aroma-type baijiu (liquor) according to geographical origin using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. He Y, Liu Z, Qian M, Yu X, Xu Y, Chen S (2020) Unraveling the chemosensory characteristics of strong-aroma type Baijiu from different regions using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry and descriptive sensory analysis. Food Chem 331:127335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng Y, Su G, Sun-Waterhouse D, Cai Y, Zhao H, Cui C, Zhao M (2017) Optimization of headspace solid-phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME) for analyzing soy sauce aroma compounds via coupling with direct GC-olfactometry (D-GC-O) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Food Anal Methods 10(3):713–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-016-0612-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bean HD, Hill JE, Dimandja JMD (2015) Improving the quality of biomarker candidates in untargeted metabolomics via peak table-based alignment of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data. J Chromatogr A 1394:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.03.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dehlholm C, Brockhoff PB, Meinert L, Aaslyng MD, Bredie WLP (2012) Rapid descriptive sensory methods—comparison of free multiple sorting, partial napping, napping, flash profiling and conventional profiling. Food Qual Prefer 26(2):267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ISO 8586:2023 (2023) Sensory analysis—selection and training of sensory assessors. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland

  17. ISO 11132–2021 (2021) Sensory analysis-Methodology-Guidelines for the measurement of the performance of a quantitative descriptive sensory panel. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland

  18. Costell E (2002) A comparison of sensory methods in quality control. Food Qual Prefer 13(6):341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00020-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Milić BL, Piletić MV (1984) The mechanism of pyrrole, pyrazine and pyridine formation in non-enzymic browning reaction. Food Chem 13(3):165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(84)90071-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pripis-Nicolau L, de Revel G, Bertrand A, Maujean A (2000) Formation of flavor components by the reaction of amino acid and carbonyl compounds in mild conditions. J Agric Food Chem 48(9):3761–3766. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf991024w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mishra PK, Tripathi J, Gupta S et al (2017) Effect of cooking on aroma profile of red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and correlation with sensory quality. Food Chem 215:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu J, Chen F, Wang L, Niu Y, Xiao Z (2017) Evaluation of the synergism among volatile compounds in Oolong tea infusion by odour threshold with sensory analysis and E-nose. Food Chem 221:1484–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng L, Lin W, Li P, Huang J, Luo L (2014) Comparison of microbial communities between normal and swollen canned soy sauces using nested PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, HPLC and plate techniques. Int J Food Sci Technol 49(11):2499–2505. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kortesniemi M, Slupsky CM, Ollikka T, Kauko L, Spevacek AR, Sjövall O, Yang B, Kallio H (2016) NMR profiling clarifies the characterization of Finnish honeys of different botanical origins. Food Res Int 86:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.05.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu H, Chen X, Lu J, Wu D (2023) Evaluation of the differences between low-salt solid-state fermented soy sauce and high-salt diluted-state fermented soy sauce in China: from taste-active compounds and aroma-active compounds to sensory characteristics. J Sci Food Agric. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhai Y, Guo M, Meng Q, Song H (2023) Characterization of key odor-active compounds in high quality high-salt liquid-state soy sauce. J Food Compos Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meng Q, Imamura M, Katayama H, Obata A, Sugawara E (2017) Key compounds contributing to the fruity aroma characterization in Japanese raw soy sauce. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 81(10):1984–1989. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2017.1364620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steinhaus P, Schieberle P (2007) Characterization of the key aroma compounds in soy sauce using approaches of molecular sensory science. J Agric Food Chem 55(15):6262–6269. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0709092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Verma DK, Srivastav PP (2022) Extraction, identification and quantification methods of rice aroma compounds with emphasis on 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2-AP) and its relationship with rice quality: a comprehensive review. Food Rev Intl 38(2):111–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2020.1720231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Routray W, Rayaguru K (2018) 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline: A key aroma component of aromatic rice and other food products. Food Rev Intl 34(6):539–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2017.1347672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao G, Feng Y, Hadiatullah H, Zheng F, Yao Y (2021) Chemical characteristics of three kinds of Japanese soy sauce based on electronic senses and GC-MS Analyses. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.579808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu X, Lu L, Guo Z, Zhu Z (2020) Volatile compounds, affecting factors and evaluation methods for rice aroma: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 97:136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Brewing Microbiology and Applied Enzymology, State Key Laboratory of Food Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Ave, Wuxi, 214122, Jiangsu, China

    Kaijun Xie, Li Zhou, Shuang Chen & Yan Xu

Authors
  1. Kaijun Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This study does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1483 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, K., Zhou, L., Chen, S. et al. Revealing the differences in volatile flavor compounds between traditional and modern industrial soy sauce from China and Japan through GC × GC-TOF–MS, chemometrics and sensory analysis. Eur Food Res Technol 250, 1485–1498 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-024-04485-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-024-04485-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation