Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical, chemical and pasting features of maize Italian inbred lines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To help predicting the performance of maize flour during food processing, a set of 23 Italian inbred lines derived from recent breeding programs has been analyzed for chemical traits (protein, lipid, starch and amylose content) and pasting behavior and compared to US variety B73. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and soluble phenolic content (SPC) were also determined in maize flour. Two amylose extender lines (Lo1413ae and Lo1489ae, 31.60% and 48.41% amylose, respectively) were included in the set. A large variability was observed among the breeding lines for all the chemical parameters (protein: 9.66–14.79% dm; lipid: 2.21–5.68% dm; starch: 54.65–68.70% dm; amylose content: 18.70–48.41% dm). The range of variation of TAC (12.17–21.26 mmol TE/kg dm) and SPC (0.74–1,30 gGAE/kg dm) was also quite large. As regards the pasting properties, the peculiar values shown by the ae lines during heating led to an absence of viscosity. Among the other lines, Lo1481, Lo1530, Lo1457, Lo1451 and Lo1473 might represent the best genotypes for pasta making, due to their strong tendency to retrogradation. On the other side, Lo1430, Lo1550, Lo1270 and Lo1404, showing a lower tendency to retrograde, seem to be suitable for bread production. The relevant variability of pasting properties in the Italian germplasm, therefore, suggests the possibility to choose the most appropriate genotypes according to the hydrothermal conditions used in food processes and/or to the characteristics of the final product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marti A, Pagani MA (2013) What can play the role of gluten in gluten free pasta? Trends Food Sci Technol 31:63–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao Y, Janes ME, Chaiya B, Brennan MA, Brennan CS, Prinyawiwatkul W (2018) Gluten-free bakery and pasta products: prevalence and quality improvement. Int J Food Sci Technol 53(1):19–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roman L, Belorio M, Gomez M (2019) Gluten-free breads: the gap between research and commercial reality. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 18(3):690–702

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Woomer JS, Adedeji AA (2020) Current applications of gluten-free grains a review. Crit Rev Food Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1713724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Masure HG, Fierens E, Delcour JA (2016) Current and forward looking experimental approaches in gluten-free bread making research. J Cereal Sci 67:92–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Waterschoot J, Gomand SV, Fierens E, Delcour JA (2015) Production, structure, physicochemical and functional properties of maize, cassava, wheat, potato and rice starches. Starch/Stärke 67:14–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Varavinit S, Shobsngobb S, Varanyanondc W, Chinachotid P, Naivikule O (2003) Effect of amylose content on gelatinization, retrogradation and pasting properties of flours from different cultivars of Thai Rice. Starch/Stärke 55:410–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Athy JHV, Bhat KK (1994) Effect of particle size on viscoamylographic behaviour of rice flour and vermicelli quality. J Texture Stu 25(4):469–476

    Google Scholar 

  9. Balet S, Guelpa A, Fox G, Manley M (2019) Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) as a tool for measuring starch-related physiochemical properties in cereals: a review. Food Anal Methods 12:2344–2360

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nuss ET, Tanumihardjo SA (2010) Maize: a paramount staple crop in the context of global nutrition. Compreh Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:417–436

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brites C, Trigo MJ, Santos C, Collar C, Rosell CM (2010) Maize-based gluten-free bread: influence of processing parameters on sensory and instrumental quality. Food Bioprocess Tech 3:707–715

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uarrota VG, Amante ER, Demiate IM, Vieira F, Delgadillo Y, Maraschin M (2013) Physicochemical, thermal, and pasting properties of flours and starches of eight Brazilian maize landraces (Zea mays L.). Food Hydrocoll 30:614–624

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandhu KS, Singh N (2007) Some properties of corn starches II: Physicochemical, gelatinization, retrogradation, pasting and gel textural properties. Food Chem 101:1499–1507

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seetharaman K, Tziotis A, Borras F, White PJ, Ferrer M, Robutti J (2001) Thermal and functional characterization of starch from Argentinean corn. Cereal Chem 78(4):379–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaz Patto M, Moreira PM, Carvalho V, Pego S (2007) Collecting maize (Zea mays L. convar. mays) with potential technological ability for bread making in Portugal. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54(7):1555–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garzón R, Rosell CM, Malvar RA, Revilla P (2017) Diversity among maize populations from Spain and the United States for dough rheology and gluten-free breadmaking performance. Int J Food Sci Technol 52(4):1000–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alfieri M, Hidalgo A, Berardo B, Redaelli R (2014) Carotenoid composition and heterotic effect in selected Italian maize germplasm. J Cereal Sci 59:181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tafuri A, Alfieri M, Redaelli R (2014) Determination of soluble phenolics content in Italian maize varieties and lines. Tec Molit Intern 65(15A):60–69

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lanzanova C, Alfieri M, Locatelli S, Mascheroni S, Facchinetti F, Valoti P, Balconi C, Redaelli R (2016) Quality and safety of Italian white maize varieties. Tec Molit Intern 67(17A):52–61

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lanzanova C, Arrigoni A, Valoti P, Alfieri M, Locatelli S (2019) Agronomic performance, chemical composition and Fusarium verticillioides resistance of Italian white maize varieties. Qual Assur Saf Crop 11(6):549–559

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bertolini M, Mazzinelli G, Sartori G, Chittò A, Verderio A, Introzzi F, Bressan M, Pino S, Lorenzoni C, Bonardi P, Motto M (2000) Breeding activity of the Maize Station of Bergamo: inbreds released in the period 1989–1998. Maydica 45:73–87

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lozano-Alejo N, Vázquez Carrillo G, Pixley K, Palacios-Rojas N (2007) Physical properties and carotenoid content of maize kernels and its nixtamalized snacks. Innov Food Sci Emerg 8(3):385–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marengo M, Barbiroli A, Bonomi F, Casiraghi MC, Marti A, Pagani MA, Hogenboom JA (2017) Macromolecular traits in the african rice Oryza glaberrima and in Glaberrima/Sativa crosses, and their relevance to processing. J Food Sci 82(10):2298–2305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hammer Ř, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeont Electr 4(1):9

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guelpa A, Bevilacqua M, Marini F, O’Kennedy K, Geladi P, Manley M (2015) Application of Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) viscograms and chemometrics for maize hardness characterization. Food Chem 173:1220–1227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Berardo N, Mazzinelli G, Valoti P, Laganà P, Redaelli R (2009) Characterization of maize germplasm for the chemical composition of the grain. J Agric Food Chem 57(6):2378–2384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tam LM, Corke H, Tan WT, Li J, Collado LS (2004) Production of Bihon-type noodles from maize starch differing in amylose content. Cereal Chem 81:475–480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Revilla P, Garzón R, Rosell CM, Malvar RA (2019) Effects of high amylopectin (waxy1) and high-quality protein (opaque2) maize mutants in agronomic performance and bakery quality. J Cereal Sci 89:102796

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Perera A, Meda V, Tyler RT (2010) Resistant starch: a review of analytical protocols for determining resistant starch and of factors affecting the resistant starch content of foods. Food Res Int 43:1959–1974

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu S, Yuan TZ, Wang X, Reimer M, Isaak C, Ai Y (2019) Behaviors of starches evaluated at high heating temperatures using a new model of Rapid Visco Analyzer-RVA 4800. Food Hydrocoll 94:217–228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Granfeldt Y, Drews A, Bjőrck I (1995) Arepas made from high amylose corn flour produce favorably low glucose and insulin responses in healthy humans. J Nutrition 125(3):459–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Redaelli R, Alfieri M, Cabassi G (2016) Development of a NIRS calibration for total antioxidant capacity in maize germplasm. Talanta 154:164–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adom KK, Liu RH (2002) Antioxidant activity of grains. J Agric Food Chem 50:6182–6187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Blandino M, Alfieri M, Giordano D, Vanara F, Redaelli R (2017) Distribution of bioactive compounds in maize fractions obtained in two different types of large scale milling processes. J Cereal Sci 77:251–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dykes L, Rooney LW (2007) Phenolic compounds in cereal grains and their health benefits. Cereal Food World 52(3):105–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zilic S, Serpen A, Akıllıoglu G, Gökmen V, Vancetovic J (2012) Phenolic compounds, carotenoids, anthocyanins and antioxidant capacity of colored maize (Zea mays L.) kernel. J Agric Food Chem 60(5):1224–1231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brewer MS (2011) Natural antioxidants: sources, compounds, mechanisms of action, and potential applications. Compr Rev Food Sci F 10:221–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bresciani A, Carrara D, Blandino M, Marti A (2019) Extrusion-cooking of maize and relationship between amylose:amylopectin ratio and snack features. In: 18th European Young Cereal Scientist and Technology Workshop. San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy.

  39. Tyl C, Marti A, Hayek J, Anderson J, Ismail BP (2018) Effect of growing location and variety on nutritional and functional properties of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) grown as a double crop. Cereal Chem 95(2):288–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Acquistucci R, Francisci R, Bucci R, Ritota M, Mazzini F (2009) Nutritional and physicochemical characterisation of Italian rice flours and starches. Food Sci Tech Res 15:507–518

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cozzolino D (2016) The use of the rapid visco analyser (RVA) in breeding and selection of cereals. J Cereal Sci 70:282–290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by FAO project Plant Genetic Resources (DM 3825 18/02/2014)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michela Alfieri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Compilance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any study with human or animal subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 58 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alfieri, M., Bresciani, A., Zanoletti, M. et al. Physical, chemical and pasting features of maize Italian inbred lines. Eur Food Res Technol 246, 2205–2214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03565-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03565-1

Keywords

Navigation