Skip to main content
Log in

Pilot study on the discrimination of commercial Leptospermum honeys from New Zealand and Australia by HPLC–MS/MS analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manuka honey from New Zealand is derived from the nectar of Leptospermum scoparium and contains high amounts of methylglyoxal (MGO), which is responsible for its extraordinary antibacterial properties and its high market value. It was shown recently, that honeys from Australian Leptospermum species, often referred to as “jellybush honey”, also contain MGO. Recently, an official method has been published by the Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) New Zealand to characterize monofloral and multifloral manuka honey from New Zealand, based on the concentration of the phytochemical compounds 2′-methoxyacetophenone (2-MAP), 2-methoxybenzoic acid (2-MB), 3-phenyllactic acid (3-PLA) and 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid (4-HPLA). Here we show that these phytochemical markers are suitable to differentiate honeys originating from Leptospermum species from New Zealand or Australia, respectively. Three non-manuka honeys and eight manuka honeys from New Zealand as well as four non-Leptospermum honeys and 15 Leptospermum honeys from Australia were analysed for their MGO content via RP-HPLC-UV and their 2-MAP, 2-MB, 4-HPLA and 3-PLA concentration via RP-HPLC–MS/MS. All non-manuka honeys contained only negligible amounts of MGO, whereas honeys from Leptospermum species contained up to 1100 mg/kg, independent of the geographical origin. No significant amounts of 3-PLA, 4-HPLA, 2-MB and 2-MAP were found in the non-manuka honeys. In contrast, all marker compounds were abundantly present in manuka honeys from New Zealand, thus enabling a characterization of monofloral or multifloral quality. All honey samples from Australian Leptospermum species contained 2-MAP in concentrations below the limit of detection. The concentrations of the other marker compounds ranged from 58 to 357 mg/kg for 3-PLA, from 1 to 3 mg/kg for 4-HPLA and from 26 to 175 mg/kg for 2-MB and were significantly different when compared to New Zealand manuka honeys. Based on the results of this study, the marker compounds suggested by the MPI might be useful to distinguish honeys derived from Leptospermum species of different geographical origins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

4-HPLA:

4-Hydroxyphenyllactic acid

3-PLA:

3-Phenyllactic acid

2-MB:

2-Methoxybenzoic acid

2-MAP:

2′-Methoxyacetophenone

NLH:

Non-Leptospermum honeys

MGO:

Methylglyoxal

LOD:

Limit of detection

LOQ:

Limit of quantification

MRM:

Multiple reaction monitoring

MPI:

Ministry of Primary Industries

References

  1. Mavric E, Wittmann S, Barth G, Henle T (2008) Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Mol Nutr Food Res 52:483–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atrott J, Haberlau S, Henle T (2012) Studies on the formation of methylglyoxal from dihydroxyacetone in Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey. Carbohydr Res 361:7–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams CJ, Manley-Harris M, Molan PC (2009) The origin of methylglyoxal in New Zealand manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey. Carbohydr Res 344:1050–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams S, King J, Revell M et al (2014) Regional, annual, and individual variations in the dihydroxyacetone content of the nectar of manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) in New Zealand. J Agric Food Chem 62:10332–10340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Norton AM, Mckenzie LN, Brooks PR, Pappalardo LJ (2015) Quantitation of dihydroxyacetone in Australian Leptospermum nectar via high-performance liquid chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 63:6513–6517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Windsor S, Pappalardo M, Brooks P et al (2012) A convenient new analysis of dihydroxyacetone and methylglyoxal applied to Australian Leptospermum honeys. J Pharmacogn Phyther 4:6–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cokcetin NN, Pappalardo M, Campbell LT et al (2016) The antibacterial activity of Australian Leptospermum honey correlates with methylglyoxal levels. PLoS One 11:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wrigley JW, Fagg M (2007) Australian native plants—cultivation, use in landscaping and propagation. New Holland Publishers, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson J (1989) A revision of the genus leptospermum (Myrtaceae). Telopea 3:301–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephens JMC, Molan PC, Clarkson BD (2005) A review of Leptospermum scoparium (Myrtaceae) in New Zealand. New Zeal J Bot 43:431–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Price JN, Morgan JW (2006) Variability in plant fitness influences range expansion of Leptospermum scoparium. Ecography 4:623–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ministry for Primary Industries (2015) Apiculture monitoring report, pp 1–12

  13. Oelschlaegel S, Gruner M, Wang P-N et al (2012) Classification and characterization of manuka honeys based on phenolic compounds and methylglyoxal. J Agric Food Chem 60:7229–7237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kato Y, Umeda N, Maeda A et al (2012) Identification of a novel glycoside, leptosin, as a chemical marker of manuka honey. J Agric Food Chem 60:3418–3423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beitlich N, Koelling-Speer I, Oelschlaegel S, Speer K (2014) Differentiation of Manuka Honey from Kanuka Honey and from Jelly Bush Honey using HS-SPME-GC/MS and UHPLC-PDA-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem 62:6435–6444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spiteri M, Rogers KM, Jamin E et al (2017) Combination of 1H NMR and chemometrics to discriminate manuka honey from other floral honey types from Oceania. Food Chem 217:766–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry for Primary Industries (2017) Criteria for identifying mānuka honey: a summary of the mānuka honey science programme. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/17314-criteria-for-identifying-manuka-honeysummary-report

  18. Irish J, Blair S, Carter D (2011) The antibacterial activity of honey derived from Australian flora. PLoS One 6:e18229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roshan N, Rippers T, Locher C, Hammer KA (2016) Antibacterial activity and chemical characteristics of several Western Australian honeys compared to manuka honey and pasture honey. Arch Microbiol 199:347–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ministry for Primary Industries (2017) Determination of four chemical characterisation compounds in honey by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/17347-determination-of-four-chemical-characterisation-compounds-in-honey-by-liquidchromatography-tandem-mass-spectrometry-lc-msms

  21. Bong J, Loomes KM, Lin B, Stephens JM (2017) New approach: chemical and fluorescence profiling of NZ honeys. Food Chem. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.065

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Rückriemen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rückriemen, J., Henle, T. Pilot study on the discrimination of commercial Leptospermum honeys from New Zealand and Australia by HPLC–MS/MS analysis. Eur Food Res Technol 244, 1203–1209 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3036-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3036-1

Keywords

Navigation