Mineral and volatile composition of água-mel from Portugal

Abstract

Água-mel (honey–water) is a typical honey-based product produced by the Portuguese beekeepers, particularly in southern Portugal. Água-mel was characterized by mineral content and volatiles contents. Mineral content evaluation was performed based on a random sampling of 14 samples from a total of 16 samples provided by local producers. Mineral content showed that potassium predominated in água-mel samples (1270–4105 mg/kg). The concentration of aluminium in one sample was tenfold higher (5.8 mg/kg) than in the remaining samples (0.3–0.6 mg/kg). Água-mel volatiles were isolated by hydrodistillation and analysed by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) from a subset of eight samples. Cluster analysis showed two poorly correlated clusters (S corr < 0.3). Cluster I only sample was dominated by trans-β-ocimene (19 %), γ-terpinene (15 %) and 2-furfural (9 %). Cluster II that included the remaining seven samples showed two moderately correlated subclusters (S corr < 0.5). The six samples with high correlation from subcluster IIa were dominated by 2-furfural (18–41 %) and benzene acetaldehyde (12–39 %). n-Nonadecane (14 %), n-heneicosane and 2-furfural (both 13 %) were the main components of subcluster IIb sample. Although the presence of some volatile compounds can help in the correlation between água-mel and honey botanical source, the final product varies largely according to the preparation process even for the same producer, in different years. Água-mel detailed characterization may assist in bringing added value to this typical Portuguese honey-based product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Abbreviations

GC:

Gas chromatography

GC–MS:

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

References

  1. 1.

    Spano N, Ciulu M, Floris I, Panzanelli A, Pilo MI, Piu PC, Scanu R, Sanna G (2008) Food Chem 108(1):81–85

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jerković I, Kasum A, Marijanović Z, Tuberoso CIG (2011) Food Chem 124(1):401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tornuka F, Karaman S, Ozturk I, Toker OS, Tastemur B, Sagdic O, Dogan M, Kayacier A (2013) Ind Crops Prod 46(1):124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Čanadanović-Brunet J, Ćetković G, Šaponjac VT, Stajčić S, Vulić J, Djilas S, Štajnerb D, Popović B (2014) Ind Crops Prod 62(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Figueira AC, Cavaco T (2012) J Food Process Preserv 36(4):285–290

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Miguel MG, Antunes MD, Aazza S, Duarte J, Faleiro ML (2013) Ital J Food Sci 25:275–282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Miguel MG, Faleiro L, Antunes MD, Aazza S, Duarte J, Silvério AR (2013) Food Chem Toxicol 56(1):136–144

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Council of Europe (COE) European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (2007) European Pharmacopoeia 6th edn. Strasbourg, France

  9. 9.

    Figueiredo AC, Garcia C, Sim-Sim M, Sérgio C, Pedro LG, Barroso JG (2010) Flavour Fragr J 25(4):219–222

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rohlf JF NTSYS-pc (2000) Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Applied Biostatistics, Port Jefferson, New York

  11. 11.

    Pestana MH, Gageiro JN (2000) Análise de dados para ciências sociais. A complementaridade do SPSS. Edições Sílabo, Lisboa

  12. 12.

    Rodriguez-Otero JL, Paseiro P, Simal J, Cepeda A (1994) Food Chem 49(1):169–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Downey G, Hussey K, Kelly JD, Walshe TF, Martin PG (2005) Food Chem 91(2):347–354

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Silva LR, Videira R, Monteiro AP, Valentão P, Andrade PB (2009) Microchem J 93(1):73–77

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    González-Miret ML, Terrab A, Hernanz D, Fernández-Recamales MA, Heredia FJ (2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:2574–2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nozal Nalda MJ, Yague JLB, Calva JCD, Gomez MTM (2005) Anal Bioanal Chem 382(2):311–319

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pérez RA, Sánchez-Brunete C, Calvo RM, Tadeo JL (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50(9):2633–2637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Baroni MV, Nores ML, Díaz MDP, Chiabrando GA, Fassano JP, Costa C, Wunderlin DA (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54(19):7235–7241

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Manyi-Loh CE, Ndip RN, Clarke AM (2011) Int J Mol Sci 12(2):9514–9532

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wolski T, Tambor K, Rybak-Chmielewska H, Kedzia B (2006) J Apic Sci 50(2):115–126

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Salgueiro LR, Vila R, Tomi F, Figueiredo AC, Barroso JG, Cañigueral S, Casanova J, da Proença AP, Adzet T (1997) Phytochemistry 45(2):307–311

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cavaleiro C, Salgueiro L, Barroso JG, Figueiredo AC, Pedro LG, Fontinha SS, Bighelli A, Casanova J, Looman A, Scheffer JJC (2002) Flavour Fragr J 17(2):111–114

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG (eds) NIST chemistry webbook, NIST standard reference database number 69, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899, http://webbook.nist.gov. Accessed May 2015

  24. 24.

    Joulain D, Köning WA (1998) The atlas of spectral data of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons. E.B.-Verlag, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially funded by Ministério da Agricultura, Mar, Ambiente e Ordenamento do Território (Portugal) under research contract Programa Apícola Nacional 2011–2013, Medida 6A, and by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), under Pest–OE/EQB/LA0023/2011 and UID/AMB/50017/2013.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Graça Miguel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miguel, M.G., Aazza, S., Antunes, M.D. et al. Mineral and volatile composition of água-mel from Portugal. Eur Food Res Technol 242, 171–178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-015-2528-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Portugal
  • Água-mel
  • Honey
  • Mineral composition
  • Volatiles