Skip to main content
Log in

Diterpenes in espresso coffee: impact of preparation parameters

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of preparation conditions of espresso coffee (EC) on the diterpenes profile. ECs were prepared from roasted and ground (R&G) Arabica coffee and analyzed for the content of cafestol and kahweol by liquid–liquid extraction followed by HPLC-DAD, as well as their lipid content. The main variables in the present study were as follows: the water quantity, the amount of coffee, the particle size, the percolation time, the water temperature and pressure. Average cafestol, kahweol and lipid content of R&G Arabica coffee were 467 ± 20 mg/100 g, 638 ± 33 mg/100 g and 15.1 ± 0.1 g/100 g, respectively. Although all parameters influenced the diterpenes content of ECs (21 samples), the particle size and water quantity were the most significant ones. It was possible to reduce the total diterpenes from 58.8 ± 0.7 mg/L (2.3 mg/40 mL) to 30.7 ± 0.8 mg/L (1.2 mg/40 mL) by varying the brewing conditions. The average extraction yield of diterpenes and lipids was in the range of 1.5–2.5 and 7.0–9.0 %, respectively. Regarding total cafestol and kahweol, very fine particles seem to be more desirable for the production of highly concentrated brew (2.3 mg/40 mL) with cafestol and kahweol extraction yields of 2.8 and 2.9 %, respectively, than other studied ECs. On the other hand, samples brewed at 70 °C exhibited lower diterpenes content (1.2 mg/40 mL) and diterpenes extraction efficiency (1.4 %) with respect to all other considered parameters. This study clearly shows that parameters for coffee brew preparation may be changed to modify the diterpenes content of ECs according to the desired purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Illy A, Viani R (2005) Espresso coffee: the science of quality, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Illy A (2005) Quality. In: Illy A, Viani R (eds) Espresso coffee: the science of quality, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petracco M (2001) Technology IV: beverage preparation, brewing trends for the new millennium. In: Clarke RJ, Vitzthum OG (eds) Coffee: recent developments. Blackwell Science, UK

  4. Nunes FM, Coimbra MA, Duarte AC, Delgadillo I (1997) Foamability, foam stability, and chemical composition of espresso coffee as affected by the degree of roast. J Agr Food Chem 45:3238–3243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Navarini L, Rivetti D (2010) Water quality for espresso coffee. Food Chem 122:424–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parenti A, Guerrini L, Masella P, Spinelli S, Calamai L, Spugnoli P (2014) Comparison of espresso coffee brewing techniques. J Food Eng 121:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scholz MBS, Pagiatto NF, Kitzberger CSG, Pereira LFP, Davrieux F, Charmetant P, Leroy T (2014) Validation of near-infrared spectroscopy for the quantification of cafestol and kahweol in green coffee. Food Res Int 61:176–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitzberger CS, Scholz MB, Pereira LF, Vieira LG, Sera T, Silva JBJD, Benassi MT (2013) Diterpenes in green and roasted coffee of Coffea arabica cultivars growing in the same edapho-climatic conditions. J Food Compos Anal 30:52–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kӧlling-Speer I, Strohschneider S, Speer K (1999) Determination of free diterpenes in green and roasted coffees. J High Resolut Chrom 22(1):43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Speer K, Kölling-Speer I (2006) The lipid fraction of the coffee bean. Braz J Plant Physiol 18(1):201–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Araújo JMA, Sandi D (2006) Extraction of coffee diterpenes and coffee oil using supercritical carbon dioxide. Food Chem 101:1087–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Urgert R, Essed N, van der Weg G, Kosmeijer-Schuil TG, Katan MB (1997) Separate effects of the coffee diterpenes cafestol and kahweol on serum lipids and liver aminotransferases. Am J Clin Nutr 65:519–524

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boekschoten MV, Evert G Schouten EG, Katan M B (2004) Coffee bean extracts rich and poor in kahweol both give rise to elevation of liver enzymes in healthy volunteers. Nutr J 3(7)

  14. Lee KJ, Jeong HG (2007) Protective effects of kahweol and cafestol against hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage. Toxicol Lett 173:80–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cavin C, Holzhäuser D, Scharf G, Constable A, Huber AA, Schilter B (2002) Cafestol and kahweol, two coffee specific diterpenes with anticarcinogenic activity. Food Chem Toxicol 40:1155–1163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cárdenas C, Quesada AR, Medina MA (2011) Anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory properties of kahweol, a coffee diterpene. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Yoon YC, Sung MJ, Hur HJ, Park JH (2012) Antiangiogenic properties of cafestol, a coffee diterpene, in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 421:567–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavin C, Holzhäuser D, Constable A, Huggett AC, Schilter B (1998) The coffee-specific diterpenes cafestol and kahweol protect against aflatoxin B1-induced genotoxicity through a dual mechanism. Carcinogenesis 19(8):1369–1375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gloess AN, Schönbächler B, Klopprogge B, D‘Ambrosio L, Chatelain K, Bongartz A, Strittmatter A, Rast M, Yeretzian C (2013) Comparison of nine common coffee extraction methods: instrumental and sensory analysis. Eur Food Res Technol 236:607–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Andueza S, Vila MA, de Pena MP, Cid C (2007) Influence of coffee/water ratio on the final quality of espresso coffee. J Sci Food Agr 87:586–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchmann S, Zahm A, Kӧlling-Speer I, Speer K (2009) Lipids in coffee brews, impact of grind size, water temperature, and coffee/water ratio on cafestol and the carboxylic acid-5-hydroxytryptamides. Euro Food Chemistry XV, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andueza S, de Peña MP, Cid C (2003) Chemical and sensorial characteristics of espresso coffee as affected by grinding and torrefacto roast. J Agr Food Chem 51:7034–7039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andueza S, Maeztu L, Pascual L, Ibáñez C, de Peña MP, Cid C (2003) Influence of extraction temperature on the final quality of espresso coffee. J Sci Food Agr 83:240–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Caprioli G, Cortese M, Cristalli G, Maggi F, Odello L, Ricciutelli M, Sagratini G, Sirocchi V, Tomassoni G, Vittori S (2012) Optimization of espresso machine parameters through the analysis of coffee odorants by HS-SPME-GC/MS. Food Chem 135:1127–1133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Andueza S, Maeztu L, de Peña MP, Dean B, Bello J, Cid C (2002) Influence of water pressure on the final quality of arabica espresso coffee, application of multivariate analysis. J Agr Food Chem 50:7426–7431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang C, Linforth R, Fisk ID (2012) Cafestol extraction yield from different coffee brew mechanisms. Food Res Int 49:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moeenfard M, Silva JA, Borges N, Santos A, Alves A Quantification of diterpenes and their palmitate esters in coffee brews by HPLC-DAD. Int J Food Prop. doi:10.1080/10942912.2014.933351

  28. Illy E, Navarini L (2011) Neglected food bubbles: the espresso coffee foam. Food Biophys 6(3):335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Petracco M (2005) The cup. In: Illy A, Viani R (eds) Espresso coffee: the science of quality, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pangborn RM, Trabue IM, Little AC (1971) Analysis of coffee, tea and artificially flavored drinks prepared from mineralized waters. J Food Sci 36:355–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Petracco M (2005) Grinding. In: Illy A, Viani R (eds) Espresso coffee: the science of quality, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sehat N, Niedwetzki G (1997) Coffee lipids: analysis of diterpene 16-O-methylcafestol as an indicator of admixing of coffee. In: McDonald RE, Mossoba MM (eds) New techniques and applications in lipid analysis. AOCS Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roth K (2003) Espresso-ein Dreistufenpräparat. Chem unserer Zeit 37(3):215–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Teo CC, Tan SN, Yong JWH, Hew CS, Ong ES (2010) Pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). J Chromatogr A 1217:2484–2494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Masella P, Guerrini L, Spinelli S, Calamai L, Spugnoli P, lly F, Parenti A (2015) A new espresso brewing method. J Food Eng 146:204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ratnayake WMN, Hollywood R, Grady E, Stavric B (1993) Lipid content and composition of coffee brews prepared by different methods. Food Chem Toxicol 3(4):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by FEDER funds through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors—COMPETE, ON.2—O Novo Norte—North Portugal Regional Operational Program and National Funds through FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology under the projects: PEst-C/EQB/UI0511, NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000025—RL2_ Environment & Health and SFRH/BD/79318/2011.

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arminda Alves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moeenfard, M., Silva, J.A., Borges, N. et al. Diterpenes in espresso coffee: impact of preparation parameters. Eur Food Res Technol 240, 763–773 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2381-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2381-y

Keywords

Navigation