Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of ERIC-PCR genomic polymorphism of Salmonella isolates from chicken slaughter line

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chicken slaughter line is a source of cross-contamination of Salmonella. In this study, ERIC-PCR was applied to analyse the ERIC-PCR genomic polymorphism of Salmonella isolates from a commercial chicken slaughter line and to trace the route of contamination. Samples were collected from carcasses and contact surfaces at the points of post-evisceration, post-chilling and post-grading. The prevalence of Salmonella at the evisceration point was high but significantly decreased along the slaughter line. The ERIC-PCR fingerprints indicated that a total of seven groups were clustered, and the genotypic diversity of isolates progressively decreased along the slaughter line. By tracing the genotypic diversity, contact surfaces at post-evisceration were found to be the major contamination sources of Salmonella during chicken processing, since the genotype diversity of isolates from the post-evisceration point could be exactly matched to that from the post-chilling and post-grading points. Interestingly, three Salmonella strains were still detected after decontamination and washing; these three isolates having a strong capacity for attachment were able to produce biofilm on polystyrene surfaces. This study suggests that the evisceration point is the source of cross-contamination, with Salmonella isolates still present after washing procedure. Therefore, more effective measures must be undertaken to control the spread of Salmonella in such processing lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. EFSA-ECDC (2012) The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA J 10:2597

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Z, Jiang X (2014) Microbiological safety of chicken litter or chicken litter-based organic fertilizers: a review. Agriculture 4:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donado-Godoy P, Clavijo V, Leon M, Tafur MA, Gonzales S, Hume M, Alali W, Walls I, Wong DMA, Doyle MP (2012) Prevalence of Salmonella on retail broiler chicken meat carcasses in Colombia. J Food Prot 75:1134–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berrang ME, Bailey JS, Altekruse SF, Patel B, Shaw WK, Meinersmann RJ, Fedorka-Cray PJ (2007) Prevalence and numbers of Campylobacter on broiler carcasses collected at rehang and postchill in 20 US processing plants. J Food Prot 70:1556–1560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rasschaert G, Houf K, Imberechts H, Grijspeerdt K, De Zutter L, Heyndrickx M (2005) Comparison of five repetitive-sequence-based PCR typing methods for molecular discrimination of Salmonella enterica isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43:3615–3623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ye YW, Wu QP, Zhang JM, Lu JF, Lin L (2011) Isolation of Salmonella from meat samples and characterization by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus–polymerase chain reaction and antibiotics test. Foodborne Pathog Dis 8:935–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alessandria V, Rantsiou K, Dolci P, Cocolin L (2010) Molecular methods to assess Listeria monocytogenesroute of contamination in a dairy processing plant. Int J Food Microbiol 141:S156–S162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheah YK, Salleh NA, Lee LH, Radu S, Sukardi S, Sim JH (2008) Comparison of PCR fingerprinting techniques for the discrimination of Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar Weltevreden isolated from indigenous vegetables in Malaysia. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:327–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Meacham KJ, Zhang LX, Foxman B, Bauer RJ, Marrs CF (2003) Evaluation of genotyping large numbers of Escherichia coli isolates by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus–PCR. J Clin Microbiol 41:5224–5226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Turki Y, Mehri I, Cherif H, Najjari A, Aissa RB, Hassen A, Ouzari H (2012) Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica Serovar Kentucky isolates from Tunisia: the new emergent multi-drug resistant serotype. Food Res Int l45:925–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nath G, Maurya P, Gulati AK (2010) ERIC-PCR and RAPD based fingerprinting of Salmonella Typhi strains isolated over a period of two decades. Infect, Genet Evol 10:530–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Warriner K, Aldsworth TG, Kaur S, Dodd CER (2002) Cross-contamination of carcasses and equipment during pork processing. J Appl Microbiol 93:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SH, Jung BY, Rayamahji N, Lee HS, Jeon WJ, Choi KS, Kweon CH, Yoo HS (2009) A multiplex real-time PCR for differential detection and quantification of Salmonella spp., Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Enteritidis in meats. J Vet Sci 10:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Versalovic J, Koeuth T, Lupski JR (1991) Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to finger printing of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 19:6823–6831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Campioni F, Bergamini AMM, Falcao JP (2012) Genetic diversity, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from food and humans over a 24-year period in Brazil. Food Microbiol 32:254–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ye YW, Jiang QH, Wu QP, Zhang JM, Lu JF, Lin L (2012) The characterization and comparison of Staphylococcus aureus by antibiotic susceptibility testing, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus–polymerase chain reaction, and random amplified polymorphic DNA–polymerase chain reaction. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9:168–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Namvar A, Warriner K (2006) Application of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus–polymerase chain reaction to trace the fate of generic Escherichia coli within a high capacity pork slaughter line. Int J Food Microbiol 108:155–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim S, Wei C (2009) Molecular characterization of biofilm formation and attachment of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 on food contact surfaces. J Food Prot 72:1841–1847

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Silagyi K, Kim SH, Lo YM, Wei C (2009) Production of biofilm and quorum sensing by Escherichia coli O157:H7 and its transfer from contact surfaces to meat, poultry, ready-to-eat deli, and produce products. Food Microbiol 26:514–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Versalovic J, Schneider M, De Bruijn FJ, Lupski JR (1994) Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol Cell Biol 5:25–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Svobodova I, Borilova G, Hulankova R, Steinhauserova I (2012) Microbiological quality of broiler carcasses during slaughter processing. ACTA Vet Brno 81:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seol KH, Han GS, Kim HW, Chang OK, Oh MH, Park BY, Ham JS (2012) Prevalence and microbial flora of chicken slaughtering and processing procedure. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 32:763–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weill FX, Bertrand S, Guesnier F, Baucheron S, Grimont P, Cloeckaert A (2006) Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella Kentucky in travellers. Emerg Infect Dis 12:1611–1612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Loretz M, Stephan R, Zweifel C (2010) Antimicrobial activity of decontamination treatments for poultry carcasses: a literature survey. Food Control 21:791–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Steenackers H, Hermans K, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ (2012) Salmonella biofilms: an overview on occurrence, structure, regulation and eradication. Food Res Int 45:502–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Srey S, Jahid IK, Ha SD (2013) Biofilm formation in food industries: a food safety concern. Food Control 31:572–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shi X, Zhu X (2009) Biofilm formation and food safety in food industries. Trends Food Sci Technol 20:407–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Simões M, Simões LC, Vieira MJ (2010) A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT-Food Sci Technol 43:573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by China Agriculture Research System (CARS-42) funded by the China Ministry of Agriculture. We are very grateful to Prof. Ron Tume from CSIRO, Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Australia, for his valuable advice and for assistance with language.

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huhu Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Shu, R., Zhao, Y. et al. Analysis of ERIC-PCR genomic polymorphism of Salmonella isolates from chicken slaughter line. Eur Food Res Technol 239, 543–548 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2277-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2277-x

Keywords

Navigation