Internal bags with barrier layers for foods packed in recycled paperboard: recent progress

Abstract

Internal bags for packaging dry foods into boxes of recycled paperboard, collected in Dresden and Zurich in June 2013, were investigated with regard to the layer composition and the barrier efficiency against substances migrating from the recycled fibers. The layers were identified by microtome cuts and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, often after wet-chemical separation of the layers. The barrier efficiency was tested with five surrogate substances and classified between 1 and 5, with class 1 having no significant barrier effect, 4 being a virtually tight barrier consisting of polymeric material and 5 including an aluminum foil. Merely 17 of the 87 bags (20 %) consisted of paper or polyethylene that constituted insignificant barriers. Bags of oriented polypropylene, substantially reducing migration (class 2), were encountered in 32 % of the packs; those with more efficient, but still incomplete barriers (class 3) in 16 % and virtually tight barriers (classes 4 and 5) in 32 % of the products. This is a strong move toward efficient barriers compared to the findings in 2010. Efficient or tight barriers were found for nearly all food types, which suggests that there are no important technical obstacles against the inclusion of a barrier layer into all bags to protect the food against contamination from the recycled paper board.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Biedermann M, Grob K (2010) Eur Food Res Technol 230:785–796

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (2009) Übergänge von Mineralöl aus Verpackungsmaterialien auf Lebensmittel. Stellungnahme Nr. 008/2010 des BfR vom 09. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/216/uebergaenge_von_mineraloel_aus_verpackungsmaterialien_auf_lebensmittel.pdf

  3. 3.

    Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Barbanera M, Garbini D, Grob K (2011) Packag Technol Sci 24:281–290

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Piringer O, Franz R, Huber M, Begley TH, McNeal TP (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:1532–1538

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Franz R, Huber M, Piringer OG (1997) Food Addit Contam 14:627–640

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Johns SM, Gramshaw JW, Castle L, Jickells SM, Dtd Lebensm Rundsch 91:69–73

  7. 7.

    Johns SM, Jickells SM, Read WA, Gramshaw JW, Castle L (1996) Dtd Lebensm Rundsch 92:273–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Feigenbaum A, Dole P, Aucejo S, Dainelli D, Cruz Garcia C, Hankemeier T, N’Gono Y, Papaspyrides CD, Paseiro P, Pastorelli S, Pavlidou S, Pennarun PY, Saillard P, Vidal L, Vitrac O, Voulzatis Y (2005) Food Addit Contam 22:956–967

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fiselier K, Grob K (2012) Packag Technol Sci 25:285–301

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ewender J, Franz R, Welle F (2013) Packag Technol Sci 26(423–434):25

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Diehl H, Seyffer H, Pfeiffer A (2011) Lecture at BfR Workshop Mineralöle in Lebensmittelverpackungen—Entwicklungen und Lösungsansätze. Berlin 22./23. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/barrierewirkung-ausgewaehlter-kunststoffmaterialien-gegen-die-migration-von-mineraloelfraktionen-in-lebensmittel.pdf

  12. 12.

    Tiggelman I, Pasch H, Hartmann PC (2012) Tappi J 11(6):41–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Biedermann-Brem S, Grob K (2014) Packag Technol Sci. doi:10.1002/pts.2062 (in press)

  14. 14.

    Vollmer A, Biedermann M, Grundböck F, Ingenhoff JE, Biedermann-Brem S, Altkofer W, Grob K (2011) Eur Food Res Technol 232:175–182

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Dima G, Zurfluh M, Biedermann-Brem S, Richter L, Simat T, Harling A, Grob K (2013) Eur Food Res Technol 236:459–472

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thiele UK (2007) Polyester bottle resins: production, processing, properties and recycling. Business media GmbH, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zurfluh M, Biedermann M, Grob K (2013) Food Addit Contam 30:909–918

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Zurfluh M, Richter L, Simat T, Harling A, Altkofer W, Helling R, Grob K (2013) Food Addit Contam 30:885–898

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koni Grob.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richter, L., Biedermann-Brem, S., Simat, T.J. et al. Internal bags with barrier layers for foods packed in recycled paperboard: recent progress. Eur Food Res Technol 239, 215–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2208-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Paperboard boxes
  • Barrier test
  • Barrier efficiency
  • Surrogate substances
  • Dry foods