Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 239, Issue 2, pp 215–225 | Cite as

Internal bags with barrier layers for foods packed in recycled paperboard: recent progress

  • Lydia Richter
  • Sandra Biedermann-Brem
  • Thomas J. Simat
  • Koni Grob
Original Paper

Abstract

Internal bags for packaging dry foods into boxes of recycled paperboard, collected in Dresden and Zurich in June 2013, were investigated with regard to the layer composition and the barrier efficiency against substances migrating from the recycled fibers. The layers were identified by microtome cuts and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, often after wet-chemical separation of the layers. The barrier efficiency was tested with five surrogate substances and classified between 1 and 5, with class 1 having no significant barrier effect, 4 being a virtually tight barrier consisting of polymeric material and 5 including an aluminum foil. Merely 17 of the 87 bags (20 %) consisted of paper or polyethylene that constituted insignificant barriers. Bags of oriented polypropylene, substantially reducing migration (class 2), were encountered in 32 % of the packs; those with more efficient, but still incomplete barriers (class 3) in 16 % and virtually tight barriers (classes 4 and 5) in 32 % of the products. This is a strong move toward efficient barriers compared to the findings in 2010. Efficient or tight barriers were found for nearly all food types, which suggests that there are no important technical obstacles against the inclusion of a barrier layer into all bags to protect the food against contamination from the recycled paper board.

Keywords

Paperboard boxes Barrier test Barrier efficiency Surrogate substances Dry foods 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Biedermann M, Grob K (2010) Eur Food Res Technol 230:785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (2009) Übergänge von Mineralöl aus Verpackungsmaterialien auf Lebensmittel. Stellungnahme Nr. 008/2010 des BfR vom 09. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/216/uebergaenge_von_mineraloel_aus_verpackungsmaterialien_auf_lebensmittel.pdf
  3. 3.
    Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Barbanera M, Garbini D, Grob K (2011) Packag Technol Sci 24:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Piringer O, Franz R, Huber M, Begley TH, McNeal TP (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:1532–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franz R, Huber M, Piringer OG (1997) Food Addit Contam 14:627–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johns SM, Gramshaw JW, Castle L, Jickells SM, Dtd Lebensm Rundsch 91:69–73Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johns SM, Jickells SM, Read WA, Gramshaw JW, Castle L (1996) Dtd Lebensm Rundsch 92:273–278Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feigenbaum A, Dole P, Aucejo S, Dainelli D, Cruz Garcia C, Hankemeier T, N’Gono Y, Papaspyrides CD, Paseiro P, Pastorelli S, Pavlidou S, Pennarun PY, Saillard P, Vidal L, Vitrac O, Voulzatis Y (2005) Food Addit Contam 22:956–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiselier K, Grob K (2012) Packag Technol Sci 25:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ewender J, Franz R, Welle F (2013) Packag Technol Sci 26(423–434):25Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diehl H, Seyffer H, Pfeiffer A (2011) Lecture at BfR Workshop Mineralöle in Lebensmittelverpackungen—Entwicklungen und Lösungsansätze. Berlin 22./23. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/barrierewirkung-ausgewaehlter-kunststoffmaterialien-gegen-die-migration-von-mineraloelfraktionen-in-lebensmittel.pdf
  12. 12.
    Tiggelman I, Pasch H, Hartmann PC (2012) Tappi J 11(6):41–47Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biedermann-Brem S, Grob K (2014) Packag Technol Sci. doi: 10.1002/pts.2062 (in press)
  14. 14.
    Vollmer A, Biedermann M, Grundböck F, Ingenhoff JE, Biedermann-Brem S, Altkofer W, Grob K (2011) Eur Food Res Technol 232:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Dima G, Zurfluh M, Biedermann-Brem S, Richter L, Simat T, Harling A, Grob K (2013) Eur Food Res Technol 236:459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thiele UK (2007) Polyester bottle resins: production, processing, properties and recycling. Business media GmbH, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zurfluh M, Biedermann M, Grob K (2013) Food Addit Contam 30:909–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Zurfluh M, Richter L, Simat T, Harling A, Altkofer W, Helling R, Grob K (2013) Food Addit Contam 30:885–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lydia Richter
    • 2
  • Sandra Biedermann-Brem
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Simat
    • 2
  • Koni Grob
    • 1
  1. 1.Official Food Control Authority of the Canton of ZürichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations