Extremely low-frequency magnetic fields affect pigment production of Monascus purpureus in liquid-state fermentation
- 503 Downloads
Red pigment is one of natural coloring agents produced from the secondary metabolites of Monascus purpureus. Measures are taken to increase the pigment production. Effect of the extremely low-frequency magnetic field on the red and yellow pigment production of M. purpureus in liquid-state fermentation was estimated by exposing fermentation broth, medium and sterile distilled water used to prepare medium. The maximum yield of red and yellow pigment production had about 20 and 36 % increase for 8 days at 0.4 mT when treating fermentation broth compared to the control value. For sterile distilled water, a significant increase occurred at 0.4 mT compared to 0.1 mT for 5 h. However, the red and yellow pigment production decreased significantly at magnetic fields of 0.9 and 1.2 mT when treating fermentation broth and sterile distilled water. In contrast, the yield of both red and yellow pigment production decreased significantly compared with the control exposure for 3 and 5 h at a magnetic field of 0.4 mT. Different solution (cellular suspension, medium and sterile distilled water) exposure to magnetic fields has different bioeffect on M. purpureus SKY219. The appropriate magnetic field treatment could increase the efficiency of red and yellow pigment production.
KeywordsMonascus purpureus Pigments Liquid-state fermentation ELF-MF
We are grateful to Anita Acai for comments and revision of this manuscript. This work was supported by Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Physics Processing of Agricultural Products (Grant number: JAPP2010-3) and Yangtze University for Ph.D. Studies (03000282).
Conflict of interest
Compliance with Ethics Requirements
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
- 2.Dufosse L (2006) Microbial production of food grade pigment. Food Tech Biotech 44:313–321Google Scholar
- 7.Vidyalakshmi R, Paranthaman R, Murugesh S, Singaravadivel K (2009) Stimulation of Monascus pigments by intervention of different nitrogen sources. Global J Biotechnol Biochem 4:25–28Google Scholar
- 17.Perez VH, Reyes AF, Justo OR, Alvarez DC, Alegre RM (2007) Bioreactor coupled with electromagnetic field generator: effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Prog 23:1091–1094Google Scholar
- 19.Deng G, Xia F, Wang J, Gao M (2012) Effect the low-frequency alternating magnetic field on biomass of Monascus solid-state fermentation (in Chinese). Transact Chin Soc Agricul Machi 43:128–132Google Scholar
- 21.Liu Y (2002) Electromagnetic biological effects. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 27.Nasher SH (2008) The effect of magnetic water on growth of chick-pea seeds. Eng Tech 26:16–20Google Scholar
- 30.Moussa HR (2011) The impact of magnetic water application for improving common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production. New York Sci J 4:15–20Google Scholar
- 33.Ibrahim IH (2006) Biophysical properties of magnetized distilled water. Egypt J Sol 29:363–368Google Scholar
- 34.Chang KT, Weng CI (2006) The effect of an external magnetic field on the structure of liquid water using molecular dynamics simulation. J Appl Phys 100:1–6Google Scholar
- 38.Alkhazan MMK, Saddiq AAN (2010) The effect of magnetic field on the physical, chemical and microbiological properties of the lake water in Saudi Arabia. J Evol Biol Res 2:7–14Google Scholar