Skip to main content

A comparative study of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars as brewing adjuncts

European Food Research and Technology volume 236, pages 1015–1025 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Brewing with high levels of unmalted oats (Avena sativa) has proven to be successful despite their high contents of β-glucan, protein, and fat. However, little is known about the effect of different oat cultivars on the quality and processability of mashes and worts. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the mashing performance of eight oat cultivars, selected because of their low contents of β-glucan, protein, fat, and/or high starch content, when substituting 20 or 40 % barley malt. For this purpose, seven husked (A. sativa L. ‘Lutz’, ‘Buggy’, ‘Galaxy’, ‘Scorpion’, ‘Typhon’, ‘Ivory’, ‘Curly’) and one naked oat cultivar (A. sativa var. nuda ‘NORD 07/711’) were fully characterized using standard methods, Lab-on-a-Chip capillary electrophoresis, and scanning electron microscopy. The rheological behavior of mashes containing up to 40 % of each oat cultivar was measured during mashing by applying a Physica MCR rheometer. In addition, the quality of worts obtained from laboratory-scale mashing trials was analyzed particularly with regard to their cytolytic, proteolytic, and amylolytic properties. The substitution of up to 40 % barley malt with husked or naked oats resulted in significantly higher pH values, β-glucan contents, and viscosities as well as significantly lower soluble nitrogen and polyphenol contents, color values, filtration rates, and apparent attenuation limits. Naked oats contained significantly less β-glucan as well as more protein and starch than the seven husked oat cultivars. The replacement of barley malt with naked oats resulted in a constant extract yield, whereas the use of husked oats caused significant extract losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Welch RW (2011) In: Webster FH, Wood PJ (eds) Oats: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wood PJ (2011) In: Webster FH, Wood PJ (eds) Oats: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller SS, Fulcher RG (2011) In: Webster FH, Wood PJ (eds) Oats: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salmenkallio-Marttila M, Heiniö R-L, Kaukovirta-Norja A, Poutanen K (2011) In: Webster FH, Wood PJ (eds) Oats: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wood PJ, Siddiqui IR, Paton D (1978) Extraction of high-viscosity gums from oats. Cereal Chem 55:1038–1049

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatty RS (1992) Total and extractable β-glucan contents of oats and their relationship to viscosity. J Cereal Sci 15:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beer MU, Wood PJ, Weisz J (1997) Molecular weight distribution and (1 → 3)(1 → 4)-β-D-glucan content of consecutive extracts of various oat and barley cultivars. Cereal Chem 74:476–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gajdošová A, Petruláková Z, Havrlentová M, Červená V, Hozová B, Šturdík E, Kogan G (2007) The content of water-soluble and water-insoluble β-D-glucans in selected oats and barley varieties. Carbohydr Polym 70:46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bamforth CW (1985) Biochemical approaches to beer quality. J Inst Brew 91:154–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Doublier J-L, Wood PJ (1995) Rheological properties of aqueous solutions of (1 → 3)(1 → 4)-β-D-glucan from oats (Avena sativa L.). Cereal Chem 72:335–340

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ajithkumar A, Andersson R, Åman P (2005) Content and molecular weight of extractable β-glucan in American and Swedish oat samples. J Agric Food Chem 53:1205–1209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Letters R (1977) In: Proceedings of the 16th European Brewery Convention Congress, Amsterdam

  13. Morrison WR (1988) Lipids in cereal starches: a review. J Cereal Sci 8:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehtinen P, Kaukovirta-Norja A (2011) In: Webster FH, Wood PJ (eds) Oats: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paterson A, Swanston JS, Piggott JR (2003) In: Lea AGH, Piggott JR (eds) Fermented beverage production, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kar A, Jacquier J-C, Morgan DJ, Lyng JG, McKenna BM (2005) Influence of lipid extraction process on the rheological characteristics, swelling power, and granule size of rice starches in excess water. J Agric Food Chem 53:8259–8264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibiński M, Palasiński M, Tomasik P (1993) Physicochemical properties of defatted oat starch. Starch/Stärke 45:354–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schnitzenbaumer B, Kerpes R, Titze J, Jacob F, Arendt EK (2012) Impact of various levels of unmalted oats (Avena sativa L.) on the quality and processability of mashes, worts, and beers. J Am Soc Brew Chem 70:142–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jacob F (ed) (2011) MEBAK Raw materials, collection of brewing analysis methods of the Mitteleuropäische Brautechnische Analysenkommission. Self-published by MEBAK, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany

  20. Brijs K, Trogh I, Jones BL, Delcour JA (2002) Proteolytic enzymes in germinating rye grains. Cereal Chem 79:423–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Klose C, Schehl BD, Arendt EK (2009) Fundamental study on protein changes taking place during malting of oats. J Cereal Sci 49:83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliveira PM, Mauch A, Jacob F, Waters DM, Arendt EK (2012) Fundamental study on the influence of Fusarium infection on quality and ultrastructure of barley malt. Int J Food Microbiol 156:32–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schnitzenbaumer B, Arendt EK, Titze J (2013) Statistical comparison of a new rheological method for defining changes in mash consistency during mashing with the established Rapid Visco Analyser. J Cereal Sci 57:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miedaner H (ed) (2002) Brautechnische Analysenmethoden Band II, Methodensammlung der Mitteleuropäischen Brautechnischen Analysenkommission, 4th edn. Selbstverlag der MEBAK, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany

  25. Gosset WS (1908) The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  26. Welch RW, Hayward MV, Jones DIH (1983) The composition of oat husk and its variation due to genetic and other factors. J Sci Food Agric 34:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grausgruber H, Scheiblauer J, Schönlechner R, Ruckenbauer P, Berghofer E (2004) In: Vollmann J, Grausgruber H, Ruckenbauer P (eds) Genetic variation for plant breeding. Proceedings of the 17th EUCARPIA General Congress. BOKU—University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

  28. Youngs VL, Püskülcü M, Smith RR (1977) Oat lipids. I. Composition and distribution of lipid components in two oat cultivars. Cereal Chem 54:803–812

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Girardet N, Webster FH (2011) In: Webster FH, Wood PJ (eds) Oats: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  30. Miller SS, Wood PJ, Pietrzak LN, Fulcher RG (1993) Mixed linkage β-glucan, protein content, and kernel weight in Avena species. Cereal Chem 70:231–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Givens DI, Davies TW, Laverick RM (2004) Effect of variety, nitrogen fertiliser and various agronomic factors on the nutritive value of husked and naked oats grain. Anim Feed Sci Technol 113:169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Griffey C, Brooks W, Kurantz M, Thomason W, Taylor F, Obert D, Moreau R, Flores R, Sohn M, Hicks K (2010) Grain composition of Virginia winter barley and implications for use in feed, food, and biofuels production. J Cereal Sci 51:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Briggs DE (1998) Malts and malting. Blackie Academic & Professional, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Youngs VL (1972) Protein distribution in the oat kernel. Cereal Chem 49:407–411

    Google Scholar 

  35. Delcour JA, Hoseney RC (2010) Principles of cereal science and technology, 3rd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Sayar S, White PJ (2011) In: Webster FH, Wood PJ (eds) Oats: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  37. Back W (ed) (2008) Ausgewählte Kapitel der Brauereitechnologie, 2nd edn. Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nürnberg, Germany

  38. Evans DE, Sheehan MC (2002) Don’t be fobbed off: the substance of beer foam—a review. J Am Soc Brew Chem 60:47–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Evans DE, Hamet MAG (2005) The selection of a dried yeast strain for use in the apparent attenuation limit malt analysis (AAL) procedure. J Inst Brew 111:209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Autio K, Myllymäki O, Suortti T, Saastamoinen M, Poutanen K (1992) Physical properties of (1 → 3), (1 → 4)-β-D-glucan preparates isolated from Finnish oat varieties. Food Hydrocoll 5:513–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mikyška A, Hrabák M, Hašková D, Šrogl J (2002) The role of malt and hop polyphenols in beer quality, flavour and haze stability. J Inst Brew 108:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the InBev-Baillet Latour Fund. The authors would like to thank Steffen Beuch (Nordsaat Saatzucht GmbH, Granskevitz, Germany) for generously providing oat cultivars.

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, College Road, Cork, Ireland

    Birgit Schnitzenbaumer & Elke K. Arendt

Authors
  1. Birgit Schnitzenbaumer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elke K. Arendt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke K. Arendt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnitzenbaumer, B., Arendt, E.K. A comparative study of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars as brewing adjuncts. Eur Food Res Technol 236, 1015–1025 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-1965-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-1965-2

Keywords

  • Oat cultivars
  • Brewing adjunct
  • Mashing
  • Rheological mash profile
  • Wort quality