Relation between volatile composition, ellagitannin content and sensory perception of oak wood chips representing different toasting processes
- 558 Downloads
The evolution of both volatile and nonvolatile (ellagitannins) compounds extracted from oak wood chips while being macerated for 3 months in wine model solution with eight different commercial chips [Toasted LT (Light Toast), LT+ (Light plus Toast), MT (Medium Toast), MT+ (Medium plus Toast), HT (Heavy Toast), Noisette, Special) and un-toasted (UN)] was studied. Sensory analysis concerning vanilla, spicy, overall woody, astringency, bitterness and sweetness descriptors was conducted in parallel. A 2-month time is needed for the maximum extraction of ellagitannins and of furfural compound. Relating to other volatile compounds, their concentration increased progressively over time. Spicy, woody and vanilla aromas as well as sweetness perception increased during contact time with oak wood. Additionally to pyrolytic toasting stage, watering process during toasting influences significantly oak wood composition (lactones, vanillin guaiacol compounds and ellagitannins). Correlation analysis between chemical and sensory data demonstrated significant correlations between chemical and sensory parameters and provides some insight into the implication of volatile and nonvolatile composition on the final quality perception of astringency. A predictive model between astringency intensity and ellagitannins, furfural, guaiacol and methyl guaiacol contents was established. Ellagitannins levels explained 45 %, guaiacol and methyl guaiacol contents interpreted 13.20 and 8.86 %, respectively, whereas furfural levels justified 5.66 % of the total astringency variance.
KeywordsOak wood Volatile compounds Ellagitannins Astringency Predictive model
The authors gratefully thank Dr. Tempère Sophie for her essential advices in the training of the judges as well as the judges who participated in the sensory analyses. We also thank Dr. Warren Albertin for her suggestions in statistical analysis.
Conflict of interest
Compliance with Ethics Requirements
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
- 4.Hervé Du, Penhoat CLM, Michon VMF, Peng S, Viriot C, Scalbert A, Gage D (1991) Structural elucidation of new dimeric ellagitannins from Quercus robur L. roburins A-E. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:1653–1660Google Scholar
- 14.De Coninck G, Jordão AM, Ricardo-Da-Silva JM, Laureano O (2006) Evolution of phenolic composition and sensory properties in red wine aged in contact with Portuguese and French oak wood chips. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 40:25–34Google Scholar
- 18.Sauvageot F, Feuillat F (1999) The influence of oak wood (Quercus robur L., Q. petraea Liebl.) on the flavor of Burgundy Pinot noir. An examination of variation among individual trees. Am J Enol Vitic 50:447–455Google Scholar
- 19.Masson E, Baumes R, Moutounet M, Puech JL (2000) The effect of kiln-drying on the levels of ellagitannins and volatile compounds of European oak (Quercus petraea Liebl.) stave wood. Am J Enol Vitic 51:201–214Google Scholar
- 21.Barbe JC, Bertrand A (1996) Quantitative analysis of volatile compounds stemming from oak wood. Application to the aging of wines in barrels. J Cooperage Sci Technol 2:83–88Google Scholar
- 23.ISO (2008) 8586-22 Sensory analysis—General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors—Part 2: expert sensory assessorsGoogle Scholar
- 24.Jackson RS (2009) Wine tasting: a professional handbook. Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 25.ISO (1997) 3591 Sensory analysis—Apparatus—Wine-tasting glass, p 3Google Scholar
- 26.ISO (1988) 8589 Sensory analysis. Guide for the installation of a chamber for sensory analysis, p 9Google Scholar
- 31.Singleton VL (1995) Maturation of wines and spirits: comparisons, facts, and hypotheses. Am J Enol Vitic 46:98–115Google Scholar
- 32.Spillman PJ, Pocock KF, Gawel R, Sefton MA. (1996). The influences of oak, coopering heat and microbial activity on oak-derived wine aroma. In: Paper presented at the ninth Australian wine industry technical conference, Winetitles, Adelaide, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 33.Chatonnet P, Boidron JN, Pons M (1989) Incidence du traitement thermique du bois de chêne sur sa composition chimique. 2e Partie: Evolution de certains composés en fonction de l’intensité de brûlage. Connaiss Vigne Vin 23:223–250Google Scholar
- 35.Mosedale JR, Puech J-L, Feuillat F (1999) The influence on wine flavor of the oak species and natural variation of heartwood components. Am J Enol Vitic 50:503–512Google Scholar
- 37.Boidron J-N, Chatonnet PMP (1988) Influence du bois sur certaines substances odorantes des vins (Effects of wood on aroma compounds of wine). Connaiss Vigne Vin 22:275–294Google Scholar