Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-time PCR method for the detection of figwort mosaic virus (FMV) to complement the FMV 34S promoter-specific PCR assay used for screening of genetically modified plants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study a new real-time PCR assay for the detection of figwort mosaic virus (FMV) DNA is described. This assay targets a 113-bp-long sequence of the FMV open reading frame Vll, a non-conserved coding region among the caulimoviruses. Detection of FMV DNA is useful to complement screening for the FMV 34S promoter (P-FMV), a genetic element present in several genetically modified (GM) plants. The specificity of the assay was assessed against closely related plant viruses, plant species of agronomic importance or susceptible to infection by FMV, and various GM plants containing the P-FMV sequence. No cross-reactivity of the assay against the tested nontarget organisms was observed. The limit of detection of the FMV real-time PCR assay was determined at approximately 5 copies per reaction. The robustness of the method was tested using different real-time PCR instruments and PCR master mixes with no negative effects on the PCR efficiency and linearity being observed. When amplifying the FMV target DNA at a concentration level close to the detection limit, no negative influence on the PCR performance was observed in the presence of background genomic DNA from various plant species. The precision data of the in-house validation were in line with generally accepted performance requirements. In summary, the method appears fit for the purpose of a specific identification test for the presence of genomic FMV DNA, while preventing false-positive results during P-FMV screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. James C (2010) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Brief No. 42, Ithaca, NY. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/42/default.asp

  2. Waiblinger HU, Grohmann L, Mankertz J, Engelbert D, Pietsch K (2010) A practical approach to screen for authorised and unauthorised genetically modified plants. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:2065–2072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cankar K, Ravnikar M, Zel J, Gruden K, Toplak N (2005) Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of cauliflower mosaic virus to complement the 35S screening assay for genetically modified organisms. J AOAC Int 88:814–822

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaouachi M, Fortabat MN, Geldreich A, Yot P, Kerlan C, Kebdani N, Audeon C, Romaniuk M, Bertheau Y (2008) An accurate real-time PCR test for the detection and quantification of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV): applicable in GMO screening. Eur Food Res Technol 227:789–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. CERA (2010) GM crop database. Center for environmental risk assessment, ILSI research foundation, Washington http://cera-gmc.org/index.php?action=gm_crop_database

  6. Akiyama H, Watanabe T, Wakui C, Chiba Y, Shibuya M, Goda Y, Toyoda M (2002) A detection method for recombinant DNA from genetically modified potato (NewLeaf Y potato). J Food Hyg Soc Jpn 43:301–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaccaud E, Höhne M, Meyer R (2003) Assessment of screening methods for the identification of genetically modified potatoes in raw materials and finished products. J Agric Food Chem 51:550–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan L, Zhang S, Yang L, Broll H, Tian F, Zhang D (2007) Interlaboratory trial validation of an event-specific qualitative polymerase chain reaction-based detection method for genetically modified RT73 rapeseed. J AOAC Int 90:1639–1646

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Official collection of methods under article 64 of the German food and feed act (LFGB), vol 1 (L): qualitative detection of a DNA sequence of the figwort mosaic virus 34S promoter by real-time PCR—element-specific method. Loose leaf edition, Berlin, Köln, Beuth Verlag GmbH, in preparation

  10. Bahrdt C, Krech AB, Wurz A, Wulff D (2010) Validation of a newly developed hexaplex real-time PCR assay for screening for presence of GMOs in food, feed and seed. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:2103–2112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dörries HH, Remus I, Grönewald A, Grönewald C, Berghof-Jäger K (2010) Development of a qualitative multiplex real-time PCR kit for screening of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Anal Bioanal Chem 396:2043–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo J, Yang L, Chen L, Morisset D, Li X, Pan L, Zhang D (2011) MPIC: a high-throughput analytical method for multiple DNA targets. Anal Chem 83:1579–1586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shepherd RJ, Richins RD, Duffus JE, Handley MK (1987) Figwort mosaic virus: properties of the virus and its adaption to a new host. Phytopathology 77:1668–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richins RD, Scholthof HB, Shepherd RJ (1987) Sequence of figwort mosaic virus DNA (caulimovirus group). Nucleic Acids Res 15:8451–8466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gowda S, Wu FC, Scholthof HB, Shepherd RJ (1989) Gene Vl of figwort mosaic virus (caulimovirus group) functions in posttranscriptional expression of genes on the full-length RNA transcript. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:9203–9207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wurch T, Kirchherr D, Mesnard JM, Lebeurier G (1990) The cauliflower mosaic virus open reading frame Vll product can be expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but is not detected in infected plants. J Virol 64:2594–2598

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pahalawatta V, Druffel KL, Wyatt SD, Eastwell KC, Pappu HR (2008) Genome structure and organization of a member of a novel and distinct species of the genus Caulimovirus associated with dahlia mosaic. Arch Virol 153:733–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gowda S, Scholthof HB, Wu FC, Shepherd RJ (1991) Requirement of gene Vll in cis for the expression of downstream genes on the major transcript of figwort mosaic virus. Virology 185:867–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hull R, Donson J (1982) Physical mapping of the DNAs of carnation etched ring and figwort mosaic viruses. J Gen Virol 60:125–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 365–386. http://primer3.wi.mit.edu

  21. ENGL (2008) European Network of GMO Laboratories. Definition of minimum performance requirements for analytical methods of GMO testing. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/guidancedocs.htm

  22. Waiblinger HU, Graf N, Broll H, Grohmann L, Pietsch K (2011) Evaluation of real-time PCR results at the limit of detection. J Verbr Lebensm 6:411–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Laube I, Hird H, Brodmann P, Ullmann S, Schöne-Michling M, Chisholm J, Broll H (2010) Development of primer and probe sets for the detection of plant species in honey. Food Chem 118:979–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanford JC, Johnston SA (1985) The concept of pathogen derived resistance: deriving resistance genes from the parasites own genome. J Theor Biol 113:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonsalves D (1998) Control of papaya ringspot virus in papaya: a case study. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:415–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis MJ, White TL, Crane JH (2004) Resistance to papaya ringspot virus in transgenic papaya breeding lines. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 117:241–245

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tricoll DM, Carney KJ, Russell PF, McMaster JR, Groff DW, Hadden KC, Himmel PT, Hubbard JP, Boeshore ML, Quemada HD (1995) Field evaluation of transgenic squash containing single or multiple coat protein gene constructs for resistance to cucumber mosaic virus, watermelon mosaic virus 2, and zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Biol Technol 13:1458–1465

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fuchs M, Gonsalves D (1995) Resistance of transgenic hybrid squash ZW-20 expressing the coat protein genes of zucchini yellow mosaic virus and watermelon mosaic virus 2 to mixed infections by both potyviruses. Biol Technol 13:1466–1473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Scorza R, Ravelonandro M, Callahan AM, Cordts JM, Fuchs M, Dunez J, Gonsalves D (1994) Transgenic plums (Prunus domestica L.) express the plum pox virus coat protein gene. Plant Cell Rep 14:18–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lawson C, Kaniewski W, Haley L, Rozman R, Newell C, Sanders P, Tumer NE (1990) Engineering resistance to mixed virus infection in a commercial potato cultivar: resistance to potato virus X and potato virus Y in transgenic Russet Burbank. Biol Technol 8:127–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mattarucchi E, Weighardt F, Barbati C, Querci M, Van den Eede G (2005) Development and applications of real-time PCR standards for GMO quantification based on tandem-marker plasmids. Eur Food Res Technol 221:511–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. ENGL (2011) European network of GMO laboratories. Verification of analytical methods for GMO testing when implementing interlaboratory validated methods. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/guidancedocs.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Moor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moor, D., Liniger, M., Grohmann, L. et al. Real-time PCR method for the detection of figwort mosaic virus (FMV) to complement the FMV 34S promoter-specific PCR assay used for screening of genetically modified plants. Eur Food Res Technol 235, 835–842 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-012-1811-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-012-1811-y

Keywords