Skip to main content
Log in

Survey of the yeast population inside wine barrels and the effects of certain techniques in preventing microbiological spoilage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Barrels play an important role in winemaking, giving wines a specific flavour and assisting the ageing process. However, the porosity and inertness of wood encourage the proliferation of spoilage yeasts which can severely affect wine quality. The yeast microbiota resident inside barriques located in a traditional Tuscan winery were identified by partial sequencing of the 26S rDNA gene. Most of them belonged to the Saccharomyces, Candida and Pichia genera, while Brettanomyces/Dekkera represented a limited part of the population. The ability of the isolated yeasts to spoil wine through the production of volatile phenols was evaluated. Brettanomyces showed significant production of ethylphenols, with a conversion rate of over 70%; many other species of yeast showed extensive production of vinylphenols, which can have a negative impact on wine quality. To improve the microbiological control of barrels, 4 treatments were tested for their efficacy in eradicating the yeast inside the barrels: aqueous steam (100 °C, 5–30-min treatment), UV irradiation (36-W lamp, 5–30-min treatment), gaseous O3 (40 mg/m3, 30-min treatment) and aqueous O3 (2 mg/L, 30-min treatment). Steam and O3 were the most effective treatments, eliminating about 70% of yeasts. UV appeared to be less effective, probably due to the porous nature of wood, which protects cells from direct irradiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Du Toit M, Pretorius I (2000) Microbial spoilage and preservation of wine: using weapons from nature’s own arsenal—A review. S Afr J Enol Vitic 21:74–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oelofse AI, Pretorius S, Du Toit M (2008) Significance of Brettanomyces and Dekkera during winemaking: a synoptic review. S Afr J Enol Vitic 29:128–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garde Cerdan T, Ancin-Azpilicueta C (2006) Effect of oak barrel type on the volatile composition of wine: storage time optimization LWT. Food Sci Technol 39:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ortega-Heras M, Gonzalez-Sanjose ML, Gonzalez-Huerta C (2008) Consideration of the influence of aging process, type of wine and oenological classic parameters on the levels of wood volatile compounds present in red wines. Food Chem 103:1434–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Swaffield CH, Scott JA, Jarvis B (1997) Observations of the microbial ecology of traditional alcoholic cider storage vats. Food Microbiol 14:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Renouf V, Lounvaud-Funel A (2005) Incidence microbiologique de l’usage de barriques neuves et/ou de barriques usagées Revue Françaises d’Œnologie 211: 10–14

  7. Day C (2004) Developments in the management of Brettanomyces. Wine Ind J 19:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schreier P (1979) Flavour Composition of wines. Crit Rev Food Sci Nut 12:59–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilker KL, Dharmadhikari MR (1997) Treatment of barrel wood infected with acetic acid bacteria. Am J Enol Vitic 48:516–520

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anonymous (2009) Analyse microbiologique des vins et de moûts In: recueil des méthodes internationales d’analyse des vins et des moûts OIV, Paris

  11. Rodrigues N, Goncalves G, Pereira da Silva S (2001) Development and use of a new medium to detect yeasts of the genera Dekkera/Brettanomyces. J App Microbiol 90:588–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Donnell K (1993) Fusarium and its near relatives In: The fungal anamorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematic. Reynolds and Taylor, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  13. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 25:3389–3402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatonnet P, Dubourdieu D, Boidron JN (1995) The influence of Brettanomyces/Dekkera spp. yeasts and lactic acid bacteria on the ethylphenols content of red wines. Am J Enol Vitic 46:463–468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Larcher R, Nicolini G, Puecher C, Bertoldi D, Moser S, Favaro G (2007) Determination of volatile phenols in wine using high-performance liquid chromatography with a coulometric array detector. Anal Chim Acta 582:55–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sangorrin MP, Lopes CA, Jofre V, Querol A, Caballero AC (2008) Spoilage yeasts from Patagonian cellars: characterization and potential bio control based on killer interactions. W J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:945–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shinohara T, Kubodera S, Yanagida F (2000) Distribution of phenolic yeasts and production of phenolic off-flavours in wine fermentation. J Biosci Bioeng 90:90–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Millet V, Lonvaud-Funel A (2000) The viable but non-culturable state of wine micro-organisms during storage. Lett App Microbiol 30:136–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Singleton VL (1995) Maturation of wines and spirits—comparisons, facts, and hypotheses. Am J Enol Vitic 46:98–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Olmez H, Akbas MY (2009) Optimization of ozone treatment of fresh-cut green leaf lettuce. J Food Eng 90:487–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hester T (2006) New Brett solution arrives in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Grapegrower and Winemaker 512:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shearer AEH, Mazzotta AS, Chuyate R, Gombas DE (2002) Heat resistance of juice spoilage microorganisms. J Food Prot 6:1271–1275

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tournas V (1994) Heat-resistant fungi of importance to the food and beverage industry. Crit Rev Microbiol 20:243–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Erickson MC, Ortega YR (2006) Inactivation of protozoan parasites in food, water, and environmental systems. J Food Prot 69:2786–2808

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mahapatra AK, Muthukumarappan K, Julson JL (2005) Applications of ozone, bacteriocins and irradiation in food processing: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nut 45:447–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim JG, Yousef AE, Dave S (1999) Application of ozone for enhancing the microbiological safety and quality of foods: a review. J Food Prot 62:1071–1087

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Komanapalli IR, Lau BHS (1998) Ozone-induced damage of Escherichia coli K-12. App Environ Biotechnol 46:610–614

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manas P, Pagan R (2005) Microbial inactivation by new technologies of food preservation. J App Microbiol 98:1387–1399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Cristian Carboni (Aslan SRL), Dr. Francesca Frediani (Fattoria Varramista SpA) and Dr. Massimo Pindo (Edmund Mach Foundation) for their collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaele Guzzon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guzzon, R., Widmann, G., Malacarne, M. et al. Survey of the yeast population inside wine barrels and the effects of certain techniques in preventing microbiological spoilage. Eur Food Res Technol 233, 285–291 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1523-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1523-8

Keywords

Navigation