Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Survey of methylmercury in fish and seafood from the southwestern German market

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mercury is an environmental contaminant and may occur as methylmercury in marine organisms. Methylmercury is considered as having higher toxicity than the inorganic form; therefore, it is important to differentiate the mercury species in order to evaluate the potential risk for seafood consumers. In the largest study of the German market to date, 536 marine foods from the state of Baden-Württemberg (southwestern Germany) were analyzed using gas chromatography with atomic emission detection. Methylmercury was found at levels ranging from non-detectable (below 6 μg/kg) up to 567 μg/kg. The average, median, 90th, 95th, and 99th percentile contents were 38, 22, 78, 117, and 316 μg/kg, respectively. The average methylmercury proportion of total mercury was 70%. Based on a daily total fish and seafood consumption of 30 g according to the German National Nutrition Survey II, the methylmercury exposure was estimated to range between 5 μg/week (median) and 67 μg/week (99th percentile), which was below the provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) established by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. The risk of methylmercury for the German fish consumer was judged to be rather low, being restricted to the unlikely worst-case scenario of daily consumption of highly contaminated fish, which could exceed the PTWI. In conclusion, the previous opinions that the benefits of the moderate fish consumption appear to outweigh the risks associated with methylmercury exposure were confirmed by our survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Díez S (2009) Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 198:111–132

    Google Scholar 

  2. IARC (1993) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 58, Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarkson TW (2002) Environ Health Perspect 110(Suppl 1):11–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekino S, Susa M, Ninomiya T, Imamura K, Kitamura T (2007) J Neurol Sci 262:131–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarkson TW, Strain JJ (2003) J Nutr 133:1539S–1543S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain (2004) EFSA J 34:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  7. JECFA (2003) Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. Sixty-first meeting. Summary and conclusions. www.who.int/pcs/jecfa/jecfa.htm

  8. JECFA (2010) Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. Seventy-second meeting. Summary and conclusions. http://www.who.int/entity/foodsafety/chem/summary72_rev.pdf

  9. National Research Council (NRC) (2000) Committee on the toxicological effects of methylmercury: toxicological effects of methylmercury. National Academic Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nakagawa R, Yumita Y, Hiromoto M (1997) Chemosphere 35:2909–2913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dabeka R, McKenzie AD, Forsyth DS, Conacher HB (2004) Food Addit Contam 21:434–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Knowles TG, Farrington D, Kestin SC (2003) Food Addit Contam 20:813–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Storelli MM, Marcotrigiano GO (2004) Food Addit Contam 21:1051–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Juresa D, Blanusa M (2003) Food Addit Contam 20:241–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Falcó G, Llobet JM, Bocio A, Domingo JL (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:6106–6112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cortes S, Fortt A (2007) Food Addit Contam 24:955–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Storelli MM, Barone G, Piscitelli G, Marcotrigiano GO (2007) Food Addit Contam 24:1353–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2006) Sci Total Environ 367:1010–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bloom NS (1992) Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1010–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs G (1977) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 164:71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Westöö G (1966) Acta Chem Scand 20:2131–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lansens P, Leermakers M, Baeyens W (1991) Water Air Soil Pollut 56:103–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tseng CM, de Diego A, Pinaly H, Amouraoux D, Donard OFX (1998) J Anal At Spectrom 13:755–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cardoso C, Bandarra N, Lourenço H, Afonso C, Nunes M (2010) Risk Anal 30:827–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuballa T, Leonhardt E, Schoeberl K, Lachenmeier DW (2009) Eur Food Res Technol 228:425–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Quevauviller P, Drabæk I, Muntau H, Bianchi M, Bortoli A, Griepink B (1996) Trends Analyt Chem 15:160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Max-Rubner-Institut (2008) Nationale Verzehrsstudie II, Ergebnisbericht, Teil 2. Max-Rubner-Institut, Karlsruhe

  28. Lindberg A, Björnberg KA, Vahter M, Berglund M (2004) Environ Res 96:28–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Herrmann R, Möser A, Weber S (2009) The case of Germany. In: Stiegert KW, Kim DH (eds) Structural changes in food retailing: six country case studies. Food System Research Group (FSRG) Monograph Series, Madison, pp 51–75

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gochfeld M, Burger J (2005) Neurotoxicology 26:511–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Blanchemanche S, Marette S, Roosen J, Verger P (2010) Health Risk Soc 12:271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mozaffarian D, Rimm EB (2006) JAMA 296:1885–1899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was financed by a grant from the ‘Ministerium für Ländlichen Raum, Ernährung und Verbraucherschutz Baden-Württemberg’ (Ministry of Rural Affairs, Food and Consumer Protection of the German Federal State of Baden-Württemberg). The skillful technical assistance of H. Havel and H. Mann is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weißenburger Str. 3, 76187, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Thomas Kuballa, Manfred Moellers, Kerstin Schoeberl & Dirk W. Lachenmeier

Authors
  1. Thomas Kuballa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manfred Moellers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kerstin Schoeberl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dirk W. Lachenmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kuballa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuballa, T., Moellers, M., Schoeberl, K. et al. Survey of methylmercury in fish and seafood from the southwestern German market. Eur Food Res Technol 232, 737–742 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1446-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1446-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation