European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 228, Issue 5, pp 679–684 | Cite as

Release of bisphenol A from polycarbonate baby bottles: water hardness as the most relevant factor

Original Paper


The concentrations of bisphenol A (BPA) in the content of polycarbonate baby bottles reported by scientific literature were almost always clearly below 1 μg/l, but in a German consumer journal they reached 157 μg/l. These high values were interpreted as a result of microwave heating, but here they are shown to be the result of testing with tap water. Since BPA is primarily released by degradation of the polycarbonate, rather than by migration from the polymer, testing with food simulants (distilled water or distilled water/ethanol) is not appropriate. Degassing of tap water during boiling causes the pH to increase and the water to become more aggressive. BPA concentrations may reach 50 μg/l if a polycarbonate bottle is sterilized by boiling water in it (well feasible only by means of microwave heating) and this same water is used to prepare a beverage. Increased concentrations are also observed when boiling-hot beverages with a high pH are filled into the bottle, such as boiled plain water or tea. Respecting simple rules, the BPA concentrations can be kept below 0.5 μg/l.


Baby bottles Bisphenol A Polycarbonate Hard tap water Microwave heating 


  1. 1.
    National Toxicology Program (2007) NTP-CERHR Expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of bisphenol-A. Research Triangle Park (NC): US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction, National Toxicology Program, November 2007.
  2. 2.
    Environment Canada (2008) Draft screening assessment for the challengephenol, 4,4′-(1-methylethylidene)bis-(Bisphenol A). Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number 80-05-7.
  3. 3.
    EFSA (2006) Opinion of the scientific panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food on question number EFSA-Q-2005-100, adopted on 29 November 2006Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EFSA (2008) Toxicokinetics of bisphenol A. scientific opinion of the panel on food additives, glavourings, Processing aids and Materials in Contact with Food (AFC) (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-382). Adopted on 9 July 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    FDA, US Food and Drug Administration (2008) Bisphenol A.
  6. 6.
    Kawamura Y, Koyama Y, Takeda Y, Yamada T (2000) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 99:206–212Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun Y, Wada M, Al-Dirbashi O, Kuroda N, Nakazawa H, Nakashima K (2000) J Chromatogr B 749:49–56Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brede C, Fjeldal P, Skjevrak I, Herikstad H (2003) Food Addit Contam 20:684–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ehlert KA, Beumer CWE, Groot MCE (2008) Food Addit Contam 25:904–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le HH, Carlson EM, Chua JP, Belcher SM (2008) Toxicol Lett 176:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    CVUA Stuttgart (2003) Bisphenol A in Babyflaschen. http://cvuas.untersuchungsä
  12. 12.
    Biedermann-Brem S, Grob K, Fjeldal P (2008) Eur Food Res Technol 227:1053–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anonymous (2003) Babyflaschen. Gift in der Milch. OEKO-TEST Sept. 2003Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mattulat A (2008) PiCA Prüflabor, Berlin, Germany (personal communication)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feldman D, Krishnan A (1995) Environ Health Perspect 103:129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Official Food Control Authority of the Canton of ZürichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations