Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Front face fluorescence spectroscopy: a rapid tool for determining the effect of replacing soybean meal with scotch bean in the ration on the quality of Sicilo-Sarde ewe’s milk during lactation period

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the effects of substitution of a high degradable protein source, namely, soybean meal, with scotch bean, a Tunisian local product, on ewe’s milk quality. Twelve 5-year-old lactating Sicilo-Sarde ewes (third lambing) were kept in environmentally controlled sheepfold and were divided into two homogenous weight matched groups (n = 6). Ewes were fed ad libitum with two iso-energetic diets (20% barley, 3% vitamin and mineral premix, and 77% soybean meal or scotch bean). Physico-chemical analyses and fluorescence spectra were performed on milk samples during lactation period. The replacement of soybean meal by scotch bean induced a significant decrease in fat content (7.85 vs. 6.75 g 100 g−1) and a significant increase in lactose level (3.49 vs. 3.61 g 100 g−1). The principal component analysis (PCA) applied separately to the fluorescence spectral data set showed some discrimination between milk samples according to the lactation period and diet compositions. Finally, common components and specific weights analysis (CCSWA) applied to the physico-chemical data and spectral data sets allowed an obvious discrimination of milks of ewes fed soybean meal from those fed scotch bean throughout the whole lactation period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hadjipanayiotou M (1995) Small Rumin Res 18:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramos M, Juarez M (1981) Int Dairy Fed Doc 140:5–19

    Google Scholar 

  3. Storry JE, Grandison AS, Millard D, Owen AJ, Ford GD (1983) J Dairy Res 50:215–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bencini R, Paulina G (1997) Wool Technol Sheep Breed 45:182–220

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuertes JA, Gonzalo C, Carriedo JA, Sanprimitivo FJ (1998) J Dairy Sci 81:1300–1307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalo C, Carriedo JA, Baro JA, Primitivo FSJ (1993) J Dairy Sci 77:1537–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jelinek P, Gajdušek S, Illek J (1993) Živočišna Vyroba 38:85–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maria G, Gabina D (1993) Small Rumin Res 12:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peart JNJ (1993) Agric Sci Camb (1975) 85:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  10. Antongiovanni M, Mele M, Buccioni A, Petacchi F, Serra A, Mellis MP, Cordeddu L, Banni S, Seccchiari P (2004) J Anim Feed Sci 13:669–672

    Google Scholar 

  11. Atti N, Rouissi H, Othmane MH (2006) Livestock Sci 104:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahan N, Say D, Kaçar A. (2005) Turk J Vet Anim Sci 29:589–593

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pavic V, Antunac N, Mioc B, Ivankovic A, Havranek JL (2002) Czech J Anim Sci 47:80–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kráčmar S, Gajdůšek S, Kuchtík J, Zeman L, Horák F, Doupovcová G, Matějková R, Kráčmarová E (1998) Czech J Anim Sci 43:369–374

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dogan M, Sahin U, Ulgen A (2005) Milchw 60:18–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strasburg GM, Ludescher RD (1995) Trends Food Sci Technol 6:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakowicz JR (1983) Fluorophores. In: Lakowicz JR (ed) Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy. Plenum Press, New York, pp 63–93

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dufour E, Riaublanc R (1997) Lait 77:657–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kulmyrzeav A, Levieux D, Dufour E (2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:502–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schamberger GP, Labuza TPJ (2006) Food Sci 71:69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karoui R, Martin B, Dufour E (2005) Lait 85:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bertrand D, Scotter CNG (1992) Appl Spectrosc 46:1420–1425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mazerolles G, Devaux MF, Dufour E, Qannari EM, Courcoux Ph (2002) Chemometr Intell Lab 63:57–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazerolles G, Hanafi M, Dufour E, Bertrand D, Qannari EM (2006) Chemometr Intell Lab 81:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Karoui R, Dufour E, Schoonheydt R, De Baerdemaeker J (2007) Food Chem 100:632–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Albenzio M, Caroprese M, Santillo A, Marino R, Taibi L, Sevi A (2004) J Dairy Sci 87:533–542

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Antunovié Z, Steiner Z, Senčié Đ, Mandié M, Klapec T (2001) Czech J Anim Sci 46:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aganga AA, Amarteifio JO, Nkile NJ (2002) Food Compo Anal 15:533–543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reynolds CK, Cannon VL, Loerch SC (2006) Anim Feed Sci Technol in press

  30. Karoui R, Bosset JO, Mazerolles G, Kulmyrzaev A, Dufour E (2005) Int Dairy J 15: 275–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miquel Becker E, Christensen J, Frederiksen CS, Haugaard VK (2003) J Dairy Sci 86:2508–2515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dufour E, Mazerolles G, Devaux MF, Duboz G, Duployer MH, Mouhous Riou N (2000) Int Dairy J 10:81–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mele M, Buccioni A, Petacchi F, Serra A, Banni S, Antongiovanni M, Secchiari P (2006) Anim Res 55:273–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nudda A, Feligini M, Battacone G, Macciotta NPP, Pulina G (2003) Ital J Anim Sci 2:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  35. Skibsted LH (2000) BIDFD 346:4–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liang JH (1999) Food Sci Agric Chem 1:250–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kikugawa K, Machida Y, Kida M, Kurechi T (1981) Food Res Intern 39:349–355

    Google Scholar 

  38. Karoui R, Dufour E, De Baerdemaeker J (2006) Anal Chem Acta 572:125–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Dominique Bertrand (ENITIAA/INRA, Nantes, France) for CCSWA programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biosystems, K.U. Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30, 3001, Leuven, Belgium

    Sami Dridi, Josse De Baerdemaeker & Romdhane Karoui

  2. Department of Animal Production, Higher Institute of Agriculture of Mateur, Route de Tabarka, 7030, Mateur, Tunisia

    Hamadi Rouissi & Mounir Kammoun

  3. U.R. “Typicité des Produits Alimentaires”, ENITA de Clermont Ferrand, BP 35, 63370, Lempdes, France

    Romdhane Karoui

Authors
  1. Hamadi Rouissi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sami Dridi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mounir Kammoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Josse De Baerdemaeker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Romdhane Karoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romdhane Karoui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rouissi, H., Dridi, S., Kammoun, M. et al. Front face fluorescence spectroscopy: a rapid tool for determining the effect of replacing soybean meal with scotch bean in the ration on the quality of Sicilo-Sarde ewe’s milk during lactation period. Eur Food Res Technol 226, 1021–1030 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0627-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0627-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation