Skip to main content
Log in

Colour implications of self-association processes of wine anthocyanins

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Copigmentation processes have been indicated to be crucial to stabilise coloured forms of the anthocyanins and explain colour expression in young red wines. Several studies exist about copigmentation between anthocyanins and different phenolics in model solutions, but little information is available about interactions among anthocyanins themselves. In this work, the process of self-association has been investigated in wine-like model solutions containing different grape anthocyanins (the 3-glucosides of malvidin, delphinidin and peonidin). The results obtained confirmed the existence of anthocyanin self-association and its influence on the apparent hydration constant of the anthocyanins with subsequent modification in the colour of the solutions. It was observed that the greater the degree of methoxylation of the anthocyanin B-ring the greater was the magnitude of the self-association. Colour analyses in the CIELAB space showed that self-association produces changes, which are more important in quantitative parameters (chroma, C *ab and lightness, L *) than in qualitative ones (hue, h ab). Self-association leads to an increase in C *ab , indicating a more intense colour of the solutions, and to a decrease in the psychometric index L *, meaning that a darkening is produced. The effects on the colour were more pronounced with the passage of time of storage of the solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boulton RBA (1996) Presented at the forty-seventh annual meeting of the American society for enology and viticulture. Reno, NV

  2. Asen S, Stewart RN, Norris KH (1972) Phytochemistry 11:1139–1144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brouillard R, Wigand MC, Dangles O, Cheminat A (1991) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2:1235–1241

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liao H, Cai Y, Haslam E (1992) J Sci Food Agric 59:299–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies AJ, Mazza G (1993) J Agric Food Chem 41:716–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goto T, Kondo T (1991) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 30:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoshino T, Matsumoto U, Goto T (1980) Phytochemistry 19:663–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoshino T, Matsumoto U, Goto T (1981) Phytochemistry 20:1971–1976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoshino T, Matsumoto U, Harada N, Goto T (1981) Tetrahedron Lett 22:3621–3624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoshino T, Matsumoto U, Goto T, Harada N (1982) Tetrahedron Lett 23:433–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoshino T, Matsumoto U (1980) Tetrahedron Lett 21:1751–1754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Timberlake CF (1980) Food Chem 5:69–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miniati E, Damiani P, Mazza G (1992) Ital J Food Sci 4:109–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Houbiers C, Lima JC, Maçanita AL, Santos H (1998) J Phys Chem B 102:3578–3585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boulton R (2001) Am J Enol Vitic 52:67–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoshino T (1991) Phytochemistry 30:2049–2055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Somers TC, Evans ME (1979) J Sci Food Agric 30:623–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heredia FJ, Francia-Aricha EM, Rivas-Gonzalo JC, Vicario IM, Santos Buelga C (1998) Food Chem 63:491–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dueñas M, Salas E, Cheynier V, Dangles O, Fulcrand H (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dangles O, Saito N, Brouillard R (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115:3125–3132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alcalde-Eon C, Escribano-Bailón MT, Santos-Buelga C, Rivas-Gonzalo J (2004) Anal Chim Acta 513:305–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heredia FJ, Álvarez C, González-Miret ML, Ramírez A (2004) Registro General de la Propiedad Intelectual SE-1052-04 Sevilla, Spain

  23. CIE 15:2004, Technical report colorimetry, 3rd edn. CIE Central Bureau, 2004. ISBN 3 901 906 33 9

  24. Figueiredo P, Elhabiri M, Toki K, Saito N, Dangles O, Brouillard R (1995) Phytochemistry 41:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Markakis P (1982) Stability of anthocyanins in foods. In: Markakis P (ed) Anthocyanins as food colors, 1st edn. Academic, New York, 163–178

    Google Scholar 

  26. Furtado P, Figueiredo P, Chaves-das-Neves H, Pina FJ (1993) Photochem Photobiol A 78:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eiro MJ, Heinonen M (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:7461–7466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nuñez V, Monagas M, Gómez-Cordovés MC, Bartolomé B (2004) Postharvest Biol Technol 31:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Martínez JA, Melgosa M, Pérez M, Hita E, Negueruela AI (2001) Food Sci Technol Int 7 5:439–444

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support received from INIA (Grant ref. VIN03-043-C3) and CICYT (Grant ref. AGL2002-00167) is greatly acknowledged. Author M. Dueñas thanks the Spanish Juan de la Cierva program for a grant and Mr. G. H. Jenkins for his help with the English version of the ms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Escribano-Bailón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González-Manzano, S., Santos-Buelga, C., Dueñas, M. et al. Colour implications of self-association processes of wine anthocyanins. Eur Food Res Technol 226, 483–490 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0560-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0560-9

Keywords

Navigation