Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of critical processing procedures on transgenic components in quality and quantity level during soymilk processing of Roundup Ready Soybean

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By taking 2.5% (w/w) transgenic Roundup Ready Soybean as raw materials, with the detecting technology of traditional PCR and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR, this study analyzed the influence of such critical processing procedures as jordaning, siruping, blending, homogenization and sterilization in soymilk preparation on the fragment size of endogenous gene lectin and exogenous gene epsps, as well as the quantification of transgenic component in Roundup Ready Soybean, and discussed the degradation mechanism of DNA in the course of transgenic soybean processing. The results indicated that, different processing procedures differ in their impact on the degradation of endogenous gene and exogenous gene. Physical mechanical action, such as the jordaning, can make endogenous and exogenous genes degrade, and has more effect on the later. The jordaning process degraded the DNA of endogenous gene from 1883 to about 836 bp, and exogenous gene from 1512 bp to about 408 bp. In the blending procedure, exogenous gene DNA was also degraded from about 408 to 190 bp, but there was no obviously action on the endogenous gene. After the endogenous and the exogenous genes were degraded to some degree, such as 836 and 408 bp, respectively, they were not evidently affected by siruping procedure at 100 °C for 15 min. However, endogenous gene was further considerably degraded from around 836 to 162 bp in the sterilization procedure at 121 °C for 30 s. The effect of the homogenization step on endogenous and exogenous genes was similar to that of siruping procedure. In addition, jordaning and siruping greatly damaged to exogenous gene, which rapidly decreased the transgenic content from 2.5 to 1.656% and 0.435%, respectively. While the endogenous gene was not evidently affected by the blending and homogenization procedures, the exogenous gene DNA was remarkably degraded in the two procedures. Therefore, the transgenic content continued decreased to 0.377% after homogenization procedure. Hereafter, the endogenous gene was further considerably degraded more than the exogenous gene in the sterilization procedure, which caused a little bounce of the transgenic content in the final product to 0.518%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James C (2004) Preview: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: Highlights of ISAAA Briefs No. 32-2004. http://www.isaaa.org

  2. Conner AJ, Glare TR, Nap J-P (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Plant J 33:19–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jonas DA, Elmadfa I, Engel KH, Heller KJ, Kozianowski G, Konig A (2001) Safety considerations of DNA in food. Ann Nutr Metab 45:235–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiter A, Blair GE, Forbes JM (2000) DNA stability in plant tissues: implications for the possible transfer of genes from genetically modified food. FEBS Lett 481:164–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Xu BL, Su N, Ge YQ, Wang SG (2004) Real-time quantitative PCR detection of genetically modified maximizer maize and yield gard maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica 30:602–607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Canas V, Cifuentes A, Gonzalez R (2004) Detection of genetically modified organisms in foods by DNA amplification techniques. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 44:425–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holst-Jensen A, Ronning SB, Lovseth A, Berdal KG (2003) PCR technology for screening and quantification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Anal Bioanal Chem 375:985–993

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miraglia M, Berdal KG, Brera C, Corbisier P, Holst Jensen A, Kok EJ, Marvin HJ, SchiMMel H, Rentsch J, Van Rie JP, Zagon J (2004) Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1157–1180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Terry CF, Shanahan DJ, Ballam LD, Harris N, McDowell DG, Parkes HC (2002) Real-time detection of genetically modified soya using lightcycle and ABI 7700 plantforms with TaqMan, Scorpion, and SYBR Green I Chemistries. J AOAC Int 85:938–944

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vollenhofer S, Burg K, Schmidt J, Kroath H (1999) Genetically modified organisms in food-screening and specific detection by polymerase chain reaction. J Agric Food Chem 47:5038–5043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurst CD, Knight A, Bruce IJ (1999) PCR detection of genetically modified soya and maize in foodstuffs. Mol Breed 5:579–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer R (1999) Development and application of DNA analytical methods for the detection of GMOs in food. Food Control 10:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klien J, Altenbuchner J, Mattes R (1998) Nuclei acid and protein elimination during the sugar manufacturing process of conventional and transgenic sugar beets. J Biotechnol 60:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gawienowski MC, Eckhoff SR, Yang P, Rayapati PJ, Binder T, Briskin DP (1999) Fate of maize DNA during steeping, wet milling, and processing. Cereal Chem 76:371–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiter A, Blair GE, Forbes JM (2000) DNA stability in plant tissues: implications for the possible transfer of genes from genetically modified food. FEBS Lett 481:164–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kharazmi M, Bauer T, Hammes WP, Hertel C (2003) Effect of food processing on the fate of DNA with regard to degradation and transformation capability in Bacillus subtilis. System Appl Microbiol 26:495–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Wang Y, Ge YQ, Xu BL (2005) Degradation of endogenous and exogenous genes of Roundup Ready soybean during food processing. J Agric Food Chem 53:10239–10243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berdal KG, Holst-Jensen A (2001) Roundup Ready soybean event-specific real-time quantitative PCR assay and estimation of the practical detection and quantification limits in GMO analyses. Eur Food Res Technol 213:432–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin H, Wang Y, Chen Y (2003) Progress of detection technology for deep-processing transgenic product. Tianjin Agric Sci 9:32–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hemmer W (1997) Foods derived from genetically modified organisms and detection methods. BATS Report 2/97; Basel Switzerland, ISSN 1420-228, pp 1–3

  21. Hupfer C, Hotzel H, Sachse K, Engel KH (1998) Detection of the genetically modification in heat products of Bt maize by polymerase chain reaction. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 206:203–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported here was supported by the task of China Critical Project of Food, Medicine and Bio-Medical-Treatment Safety (2003DIA6N002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiqiang Ge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Ge, Y. & Wang, Y. Effect of critical processing procedures on transgenic components in quality and quantity level during soymilk processing of Roundup Ready Soybean. Eur Food Res Technol 225, 119–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0389-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0389-7

Keywords

Navigation