Abstract
Robusta coffee beans with a different initial moisture of 5, 7.5 and 10% were convectively roasted at 230 °C, microwaved at 700 W, and roasted by the coupled convective-microwave method. Sensory attributes of brews prepared from these coffee samples were evaluated. Final temperature of microwaved coffee beans was lower than that of the beans processed by the two other methods, which resulted in a higher content of volatile aroma compounds and a lesser degree of charring of their surface. Lower initial humidity of coffee beans shortened the time of roasting. However, the aroma developed upon roasting of the moistest beans was the most intense and pleasant. Modification of roasting conditions increased shifting of the overall acceptability of coffee infusions by 2 points in a 10-point hedonic scale, which implies that, if roasting conditions are adequate to the type of coffee, its sensory characteristics can be improved. Thus, optimization of roasting parameters can increase the share of robusta in well-accepted commercial coffee blends, a convenient fact because of the significant difference in price between the latter and arabica coffee.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feria-Morales AM (2002) Food Qual Prefer 13:355–367
Mendes LC, de Menezes HC, Aparecida M, Silva AP (2001) Food Qual Prefer 12:153–162
Bicchi CP, Binello AE, Pellegrino GM, Vanni AC (1995) J Agric Food Chem 43:1549–1555
McEwan JA (1998) Food Technol 52:52–56
Gutwein RW, Kirkpatrick SJ, (1998) US Patent, 5,721,005
Schenker S, Handschin S, Frey B, Perren R, Escher F (1999) In: Proceedings of the 18th ASIC Colloquium, Helsinki, Finland, pp 127–135
Maki Y, Harujama T (1995) Patent WO 95/20325
Jensen MR, Kirkpatrick SJ, Leppla JK (1995) US Patent, 5,322,703
Nijhuis HH, Torringa HM, Muresan S, Yuksel D, Leguijt C, Kloek W (1998) Trends Food Sci Tech 9:13–20
Overton SV, Manura JJ (1999) http://www.sisweb.com/referenc/applnote/ap11-a.htm
Sanz C, Czerny M, Cid C (2002) Eur Food Res Technol 214:299–302
de Jong S, Heidema J, van der Knaap HCM (1998) Food Qual Prefer 3:111–114
ISO 6668:2000. Green coffee. Preparation of samples for use in sensory analysis. Technical Corrigendum 1
Cristovam E, Russell C, Peterson A, Reid E (2000) Food Qual Prefer 11:437–444
ISO 8586-1:1993. Sensory analysis—General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Selected assessors
ISO 5496:1992. Sensory analysis. Methodology. Initiation and training of assessors in the detection and recognition of odours
Stampanoni Koeferli, CR (1998) Przem Spoż 4:36–39
Narain C, Peterson A, Reid E (2004) Food Qual Prefer 15:31–41
ISO 8589:1994. Sensory analysis. General guidance for the design of test rooms
Nebesny E, Budryn G (2003) Eur Food Res Technol 217:157–163
Gerling JF (1984) US Patent, 4,326,114
Radgwell RJ, Trovato V, Curti D, Fischer M (2002) Carbohyd Res 337:421–431
Mayer F, Grosch W (2001) Flavour Fragrance J 16:180–190
Lewandowicz G, Jankowski T, Fornal J. (2000) Carbohyd Polym 2:193–199
Hashim L, Chaveron H (1996) Food Res Int 6:619–623
Feria-Morales AM (1991) In: Proceedings of the 14th ASIC Colloquium, San Francisco, pp 622–630
Belitz HD, Grosch W (1999) Food chemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Hilderberg, pp 874–886
Dutra ER, Oliveira LS, Franca AS, Ferraz VP, Afonso RJCF (2000) J Food Eng 47:241–246
Mayer F, Czerny M, Grosch W (2000) Eur Food Res Technol 211:272–276
Ohiokpehai O, Brumen G, Clifford MN (1982) In: Proceedings of the 10th ASIC Colloquium, Salvador, Brazil, p 177
Navarini L, Cappuccio R, Suggi-Liverani F, Illy A (2004) J Texture Stud 35:525–541
Bicchi CP, Panero OM, Pellegrino GM, Vanni AC (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:4680–4686
Acknowledgements
The studies were supported by grant number 3 P06 T 032 23 from the State Committee for Scientific Researches.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nebesny, E., Budryn, G. Evaluation of sensory attributes of coffee brews from robusta coffee roasted under different conditions. Eur Food Res Technol 224, 159–165 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0308-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0308-y


