Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dietary DNA in blood and organs of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the uptake of dietary DNA into blood, kidney, and liver of salmon, and to determine the DNA fragment size if dietary DNA was detected. Salmon in groups of five fish were force-fed a feed containing a high copy number of three polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified DNA fragments. Tissue samples were dissected from the fish at time intervals starting at 1 h after force-feeding (AFF) and ending at 64 h AFF. Real-time PCR analyses were used to determine the presence or absence of DNA targets. Sensitive methods amplifying small fragments were used to minimise the impact of fragmentation on the detectability of DNA targets. Uptake of dietary DNA was observed and the highest concentrations of dietary DNA in liver and kidney were found 8 h AFF. The results correspond to data published for similar trials performed on other animal species. An additional experiment showed that decontamination of the liver surface by flaming has the potential to decrease DNA contamination from, for example, feed remnants by up to 90%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) Environmental Protection Agency Federal Register 65, October 31:65245–65251

  2. Orlandi PA, Lampel KA, South PK, Assar SA, Carter L, Levy DD (2002) J Food Prot 65:426–431

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holst-Jensen A, Rønning SB, Løvseth A, Berdal KG (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 375:985–993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schubbert R, Renz D, Schmitz B, Doerfler W (1997) PNAS 94:961–966

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doerfler W, Schubbert R (1998) Wien Klin Woechenschr 110:40–44

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schubbert R, Hohlweg U, Renz D, Doerfler W (1998) Mol Gen Genet 259:569–576

    Google Scholar 

  7. Einspanier R, Klotz A, Kraft J, Aulrich K, Poser R, Schwagele F, Jahreis G, Flachowsky G (2001) Eur Food Res Tech 212:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reuter T, Aulrich K (2003) Eur Food Res Tech 216:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tony MA, Butschke A, Broll H, Grohmann L, Zagon J, Halle I, Dãnicke S, Schauzu M, Hafez HM, Flachowsky G (2003) Arch Anim Nutr 57:235–252

    Google Scholar 

  10. Windels P, Taverniers I, Depicker A, Bockstaele E, De Loose M (2001) Eur Food Res Tech 213:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hupfer C, Hotzel H, Sachse K, Engel KH (1998) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A 206:203–207

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brodmann PD, Ilg EC, Berthoud H, Herrmann A (2002) J AOAC Int 85:646–653

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berdal KG, Holst-Jensen A (2001) Eur Food Res Tech 213:432–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. NMKL (2002) Measurement of uncertainty in microbiological examination in foods NMKL-procedure No 8, 2nd Ed 2002

  15. Krogdahl Å, Nordrum S, Sørensen M, Brudeseth L, Røsjø C (1999) Aquaculture Nutrition 5:121–133

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bakke-McKellep AM, Nordrum S, Krogdahl Å, Buddington RK (2000) Fish Physiol Biochem 22:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  17. Netherwood T, Martìn-Orùe MS, O’Donell GA, Gockling S, Graham J, Mathers JC, Gilbert JH (2004) Nature Biotechnol 22:204–209

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chowdhury EH, Mikami O, Murata H, Sultana P, Shimada N, Yoshioka M, Guruge KS, Yamamoto S, Miyazaki S, Yamanaka N, Nakajima Y (2004) J Food Prot 67:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chambers PA, Duggan PS, Heritage J, Forbes JM (2002) J Antimicrob Chemoth 49:161–164

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rønning SB, Vaïtilingom M, Berdal KG, Holst-Jensen A (2003) Eur Food Res Tech 216:347–354

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klotz A, Einspanier R (1998) Mais 3:109–111

    Google Scholar 

  22. Phipps RH, Deaville ER, Maddison BC (2003) J Dairy Sci 86:4070–4078

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bendich AJ (1987) BioEssays 6:279–282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beever DE, Kemp CF (2000) Nutrition abstracts and reviews Series B: Livestock feeds and feeding 70:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bakke-McKellep AM (1999) Intestinal nutrient absorption in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and pathophysiological response of the intestinal mucosa to dietary soybean meal. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway

  26. Swiss Food Manual (2000) SLMB-Methode 52B/2.1.3/2000 (CD-Rom, Eidgenössische Materialzentrale, PO Box, CH 3000, Bern)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported financially by a grant from the Research Council of Norway (142474/140). This is gratefully acknowledged. We would also like to thank Hannah J. Jørgensen, Svein Stueland, and Ellen Elisabeth Hage for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arne Holst-Jensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, C.R., Berdal, K.G., Bakke-McKellep, A.M. et al. Dietary DNA in blood and organs of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Eur Food Res Technol 221, 1–8 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-1160-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-1160-1

Keywords

Navigation