Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of saffron volatile fraction by TD–GC–MS and e-nose

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Saffron spice is valuable for its colour, taste and aroma. All these properties depend on the different postharvesting treatments that Crocus sativus L. stigmas received to convert it into a spice. No previous scientific data relate the volatile content with its postharvesting process or origin. In this paper, two different analytical methods are used, CG-MS to determine volatile markers and an electronic nose based on metal oxides to determine the volatile profile of the samples from different geographic origins. It is demonstrated by means of CG-MS that 3,5,5-trimethyl-2-cyclohexenone, 2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexane-1,4-dione and acetic acid are capable to differentiate saffron from its origin. The content of acetic acid is very high in samples from Iran or Morocco, while low or undetectable content was observed in Greek and Spanish samples. In turn, using an e-nose (specifically optimised for this particular application), samples from different countries could be discriminated using Principal Component Analysis with a 90% of confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ait-Oubahou A, El-Otmani M (1999) Saffron Crocus sativus L. Medicinal and aromatic plants. Industrial profiles. In: Negbi M (ed). Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Holland, pp 87–102

  2. Hassnain FM (1998) Saffron cultivation in Kashmit. In: Sethi SS (ed). Rima Publishing House, Nueva Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nauriyal JP, Gupta R, George CK (1997) Arecaunt Spices Bull 8:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goliaris AH (1999) Saffron Crocus sativus L. Medicinal and aromatic plants. Industrial profiles. In: Negbi M (ed). Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Holland, pp 73–87

  5. Ordoudi S, Tsimidou M (2004) In: Dris R, Jain SM (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 209–260

  6. Carmona M, Zalacain A, Pardo JE, López E, Alvarruiz A, Alonso GL (2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:3974–3979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cadwallader KR, Baek HH, Cai M (1997) In: Riach SJ, Ho CT (eds). American Chemical Society Symposium Series 660, Washington, DC, pp 66–79

  8. Cadwallader KR (2002) In: Winterhalter P, Rouseff R (eds). American Chemical Society Symposium Series 802, Washington, DC, pp 220–239

  9. D'Auria M, Mauriello G, Rana GL (2004) Flavour Fragrance J 19:7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanakis CD, Daferera J, Tarantilis PA, Polissiou MG (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:4515–4521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rödel W, Petrizka M (1991) J High Res Chromatogr 14:771–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tarantilis PA, Polissiou MG (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:459–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zareena AV, Variyar PS, Gholap AS, Bongirwar DR, Wani AM (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:687–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zarghami NS, Heinz DE (1971) Lebensm Wissen Techn 4:43–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zarghami NS, Heinz DE (1971) Phytochemistry 10:2755–2761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alonso GL, Salinas MR, Garijo J (1998) J Food Prot 61:1525–1528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alonso GL, Salinas MR, Sánchez MA, Garijo J (2001) Food Sci Tech Int 7:225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartlett PN, Blair N, Gardner JW (1997) Food Technol 51:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gardner JW, Bartlett PN (1999) Electronic noses. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  20. Di Natale C, Davide FAM, D'Amico A, Nelli P, Groppelli S, Sberveglieri G (1996) Sens Actuators B 33:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearce TC, Schiffman SS, Nagle HT, Gardner JW (eds) (2002) Handbook of machine olfaction: Electronic nose technology, Chap 7, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany

  22. Di Natale C, Macagnano A, Davide F, D'Amico A, Paolesse R, Boschi T, Faccio M, Ferri G (1997) Sens Actuators B 44:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Orts J, Llobet E, Vilanova X, Brezmes J, Correig X (1999) Sens Actuators B 60:106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schaller E, Zenhäusern S, Zesiger T, Bosset JO, Escher F (2000) Analysis 28:743–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Semiond D, Dautraix S, Desage M, Majdalani R, Casabianca H, Brazier JL (1996) Anal Lett 6(29):1027–1039

    Google Scholar 

  26. Knapp H, Straubinger M, Witte A, Winterhalter P (2000) In: Schieberle P, Engel KH (eds) Proceedings of the 9th Weurman flavour research symposium, Garching, Germany, pp 440–444

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gonzalo Luis Alonso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmona, M., Martínez, J., Zalacain, A. et al. Analysis of saffron volatile fraction by TD–GC–MS and e-nose. Eur Food Res Technol 223, 96–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0144-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0144-5

Keywords

Navigation