Skip to main content
Log in

Sensory and flavor profiles as a means of assessing freshness of hake (Merluccius merluccius) during ice storage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freshness of hake stored in ice was evaluated by sensory and instrumental means. The European Union scheme and the quality index method (QIM) were used to sensorially index freshness. Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) and SPME-headspace determinations were applied to monitor important odorants of hake at different freshness stages. Based on AEDA, potent odorants of hake in the very fresh state were (Z)-1,5-octadien-3-one and 3 unknown volatiles. Attempts were made to relate overall odor changes to individual volatiles: after 2 days storage, the higher FD-factors found for trans-4,5-epoxy-(E)-2-decenal, (Z)-4-heptenal, methional, and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline were associated with the “masking” of the seaweed character, whereas the higher concentrations of (Z)-1,5-octadien-3-one and (Z)-4-heptenal in hake that reached the B grade were likely responsible for the pungent odor. No highly volatile odorants were detected in hake using SPME-headspace analysis, but in contrast to AEDA, the odor intensity of some volatiles, e.g., (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal and 3-methylnonane-2,4-dione indicated a higher contribution. The detection of two low boiling odorants associated with fresh fish flavor is reported for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (2001) Eurofish 6:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luten JB, Martinsdottir E (1997) In: International institute of refrigeration (ed) Methods to determine the freshness of fish in research and industry, proceedings of the final meeting of the concerted action “evaluation of fish freshness” AIR3CT942283; Nantes Conference, Paris, France, pp 287–296

  3. Ruiz-Capillas C, Morales J, Moral A (2001) J Sci Food Agric 81:551–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baixas-Nogueras S, Bover-Cid S, Vidal-Carou MC, Veciana-Nogués MT, Marine-Font A (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:1681–1686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruiz-Capillas C, Moral A (2001) J Food Sci 66(7):1030–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Medina I, Aubourg S, Gallardo JM (2000) Eur Food Res Technol 210:353–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruiz-Capillas C, Moral A (2001) Food Res Int 34:441–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ólafsdóttir G, Martinsdóttir E, Oehlenscläger J, Dalgaard P, Jensen B, Undeland I, Mackie IM, Henehan G, Nielsen J, Nilsen H (1997) Trends Food Sci Technol 8:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Milo C, Grosch W (1997) In: Shahidi F, Cadwallader K (eds) Flavor and lipid chemistry of seafoods. ACS Symposium Series 674. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 110–119

  10. Milo C, Grosch W (1993) J Agric Food Chem 41:2076–2081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Milo C, Grosch W (1996) J Agric Food Chem 44:2366–2371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Milo C, Grosch W (1995) J Agric Food Chem 43:459–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anonymous (1996) Official J European Communities No. L334/1-14, 23.12.96

  14. Grosch W (1994) Flavour Fragrance J 9:147–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Triqui R, Guth H (1997) In: Shahidi F, Cadwallader K (eds) Flavor and lipid chemistry of seafoods. ACS Symposium Series 674. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 31–38

  16. Nunes M, Personal communication, Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR), Avenida de Brasilia, 1449–006 Lisboa, Portugal

  17. Triqui R, Bouchriti N (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:7540–7546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sen A, Laskawy G, Schieberle P, Grosch W (1991) J Agric Food Chem 39:757–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Triqui R, Reineccius GA (1995) J Agric Food Chem 43:1883–1889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moral A (1989) Alimentaria 288:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schieberle P, Gassenmeier H, Guth H, Sen A, Grosch W (1993) Lebensm Wiss U Technol 26:347–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts DB, Pollien P, Milo C (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:2430–2437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Josephson DB, Lindsay RC (1987) J Am Oil Chem Soc 64:132–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Buttery RG, Guadagni DG, Ling LC, Seifert RM, Lipton W (1976) J Agric Food Chem 24(4):829–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guth H, Grosch W (1994) J Agric Food Chem 42:2862–2866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are due to Prof. P. Schieberle (Deutsche Forchungsanstalt für Lebensmittelchemie, Garching, Germany) for providing reference samples and for assistance in the manufacturing of glass vessels. We gratefully acknowledge the International Foundation for Science (Stockholm, Sweden) for financially supporting the present work

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Réda Triqui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Triqui, R. Sensory and flavor profiles as a means of assessing freshness of hake (Merluccius merluccius) during ice storage. Eur Food Res Technol 222, 41–47 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0078-y

Keywords

Navigation