Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 221, Issue 6, pp 798–802 | Cite as

Determination of aldehydes in tequila by high-performance liquid chromatography with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatization

  • David Muñoz Rodríguez
  • Katarzyna Wrobel
  • Kazimierz Wrobel
Original Paper

Abstract

In this work, the determination of aldehydes in different tequila brands was carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography after derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. For the comparative purposes, two commercial brandies were also analyzed. The derivatization agent (50 μl of 3.5 mmol l−1 DNPH in HCl, 2 mol l−1) was added directly to the sample (500 μl) and dinitrophenylhydrazones formed were extracted with hexane. After evaporation of the solvent in nitrogen stream, the residues were dissolved in 100 μl of acetonitrile. The calibration standards were prepared from respective dinitrophenylhydrazones, following the same procedure as for beverage samples. Reversed phase chromatographic separation was achieved on Luna C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm), using gradient elution (acetonitrile:water, from 68 to 80% of acetonitrile in 20 min) and a total flow rate 1 ml min−1. Spectrophotometric detection for furanic aldehydes was at 390 nm (for other aldehydes at 365 nm). The assignation of chromatographic peaks was accomplished by comparison of their relative retention times and UV/Vis spectra with those of external standards. The method of standard addition was also used. The aldehydes identified were 5-hydroxymethylfurfuraldehyde (t ret=4.1 min), formaldehyde (t ret=5.1 min), syringaldehyde (t ret=5.6 min), acetaldehyde (t ret=6.2 min), 2-furaldehyde (t ret=7.2 min) and 5-methylfurfuraldehyde (t ret=8.9 min). At least four chromatographic peaks with retention times higher than 12 min remained unidentified. The quantification results showed drastically higher concentrations of 2-furaldehyde and 5-methylfuraldehyde in tequilas as referred to brandies. Furthermore, 100% tequilas contained higher levels of these two compounds (for four brands analyzed, mean values 18.6 and 5.97 μg ml−1, respectively) as compared to the mixed brands (five brands analyzed, mean values 6.46 and 3.30 μg ml−1). The results obtained confirm that the profile of furanic aldehydes depends on the type of fructans contained in the raw material and also on heating treatment applied or not prior to fermentation. In contrast to other polysaccharides, inulin hydrolyzes at elevated temperature and the contribution of Maillard browning reactions increases the production of furanic compounds. Our results indicate that the levels of 2-furaldehyde and 5-methylfuraldehyde could be used for discrimination between 100% and mixed tequila brands.

Keywords

Tequila Aldehyde High-performance liquid chromatography Dinitrophenylhydrazine 

References

  1. 1.
    Rodriguez Madrera R, Blanco Gomis D, Mangas Alonso JJ (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:7969–7973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barroso CG, Rodríguez MC, Guillen DA, Perez-Bustamante JA (1996) J Chromatogr A 724:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canas S, Belchior AP, Spranger MI, Bruno-de-Sousa R (2003) J Sep Sci 26:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nascimento RF, Marques JC, Lima Neto BS, De Keukeleire D, Franco DW (1997) J Chromatogr 782:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quesada-Granados J, Villalon-Mir M, Lopez-Garcia-Serrana H, Lopez-Martinez MC (1995) Food Chem 52:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amdur OM, Doull J, Klaassen D (1991) Casarett and Doull's toxicology – the basic science of poison. New York, Mac MillanGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauer-Chriostoph C, Christoph N, Aguilar-Cisneros BO, Lopez MG, Richling E, Rosmmann A, Schreider P (2003) Eur Food Res Technol 217:438–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panossian A, Mamikonyan G, Torosyan M, Gabrielyan E, Mkhitaryan S (2001) Anal Chem 73:4379–4383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mangas J, Rodriguez R, Moreno J, Suarez B, Blanco D (1996) J Agric Food Chem 44:3303–3307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mangas JJ, Rodriguez R, Moreno J, Suarez B, Blanco D (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:4076–4079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Canas S, Leandro CM, Spranger MI, Belchior AP (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:5023–5030CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cadahia E, Fernandez de Simon B, Jalocha J (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:5923–5932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quesada-Granados J, Villalon-Mir M, Lopez Serrana H, Lopez Martinez MC (1996) Food Chem 56:415–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aguilar-Cisneros BO, Lopez MG, Richling E, Heckel F, Schreier P (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:7520–7523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cedeno M (1995) Crit Rev Biotechnol 15:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mancilla-Margalli NA, Lopez MG (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:806–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antal MJ Jr, Mok WS, Richards GN (1990) Carbohydr Res 199:91–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM,-006-SCFI-1994, Bebidas alcohólicas – Tequila – EspecificacionesGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matejicek D, Klejdus B, Mikes O, Sterbova D, Kuban V (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 377:340–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blanco-Gomis D, Gutierrez-Alvarez MD, Sopena-Naredo L, Mangas-Alonso JJ (1991) Chromatographia 32:45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Albala-Hurtado S, Veciana-Nogues MT, Izquierdo-Pulido M, Vidal-Carou MC (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:2128–2133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kiridena W, Poole SK, Poole CF (1994) J Planar Chromatogr Mod TLC 7:273–277Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Risner CH, Martin P (1994) J Chromatogr Sci 32:76–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takeda S, Wakida S, Yamane M, Higashi K (1994) Electrophoresis 15:1332–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Branderberger RH, Branderberger H (1993) In: Blau K, Halket J (eds) Handbook of derivatives for chromatography. Wiley, Chichester, pp 131–40Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Munoz Rogriguez D, Wrobel K, Wrobel K (2005) Chem Anal (Warsaw) (in press)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lehtonen PJ, Keller LA, Ali-Matilla ET (1999) Z Lebensm Unters Fosch A 208:413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alonso-Salces RM, Guyot S, Herrero C, Berrueta LA, Drilleau JF, Gallo B, Vicente F (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 379:464–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Costa RS, Santos SRB, Almeida LF, Nascimento RF, Pontes MJC, Lima RAC, Simoes SS, Araujo MCU (2004) Microchem J 78:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Muñoz Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Katarzyna Wrobel
    • 1
  • Kazimierz Wrobel
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones CientíficasUniversidad de GuanajuatoGuanajuatoMexico

Personalised recommendations