Skip to main content
Log in

Metabolic response to combined mild heat pre-treatments and modified atmosphere packaging on fresh-cut peach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combined influence of mild heat pre-treatments (MHPT) and two types of modified atmosphere packaging conditions on metabolic response of fresh-cut peach was monitored during a 8-day long storage under refrigeration (4^C). The quality-affecting parameters were evaluated by physical and chemical methods (solute leakage, weight loss, firmness, colour, pH and soluble solid content) and by the evaluation of physiological aspects (respiration rate, PPO and PME activity) as well as vitamins, organic acids and sugars. Regarding main acid compounds, lower levels of malic acid are evident in heat-treated samples. Succinic and citric acids did not seem to be affected by the treatments. Provitamin A (β-carotene) was not affected by MHPT. The decrease in ascorbic acid content observed along the storage period was similar for both treated and untreated samples. Significant firmness improvements were obvious after MHPT due to the activation of PME (≈25%) and the ensuing production of calcium pectates. Efficiency of the passive modified atmosphere was enough to preserve the quality attributes of fresh-cut peaches subjected to MHPT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zagory D (2000) Principles and practice of modified atmosphere packaging of horticultural commodities In: Farber JM, Dodds KL (eds) Principles of modified-atmosphere and sous vide product packaging. Technomic Publishing Co Inc, pp 174–206

  2. Gorny JR, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (1999) J Food Sci 64:429–432

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saltveit ME (1998) Fresh-cut product biology In: Fresh-cut products: Maintaining quality and safety. US Davis conference September 12–14, 2000

  4. Varoquaux P, Wiley RC (1997) Biological and biochemical changes in minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. In: Wiley RC (ed) Minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 226–268

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soliva-Fortuny RC, Martín-Belloso O (2003) Trends Food Sci Technol 14:341–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kader AA, Singh RP, Mannapperuma JD (1998) Technologies to extend the refrigerated shelf life of fresh fruits. In: Taub IA, Sing RP (ed) Food storage stability, pp 419–434

  7. Garcia E, Barrett DM (2003) http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/pubs/

  8. Bourne MC (1987) J Food Sci 52:667–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson A, Gekas V, Lind I, Oliveira F, Öste R (1994) Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greve LC, Shackel KA, McArdle RN, Gohlke J, Labavitch JM (1994) J Agric Food Chem 42:2896–2899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aguilar CN, Anzaldúa-Morales A, Talamás R, Gastelúm G (1997) J Food Sci 62:568–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abreu M, Beirão-da-Costa S, Gonçalves EM, Beirão-da-Costa ML, Moldão-Martins M (2003). Postharvest Biol Technol 30:153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Luna-Guzmán I, Cantwell M, Barret DM (1999) Postharvest Biol Technol 17:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coteseng MY, Lee CY (1987) J Food Sci 52:985–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagerman AE, Austin PJ (1986) J Agric Food Chem 34:440–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Medlicott AP, Thompson AK (1985) J Sci Food Agric 36:561–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Romero-Rodriguez A, Oderiz LV, Hernandez JL, Simal Gandar J (1992) Sci Des Aliments12:593–600

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsieh YC, Karel M (1983) J Chromatogr 259:515–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Laurila E, Kervinen R, Ahvenainen R (1998) Postharvest News Inf 9:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  20. Crisosto CH, Kader AA (2000) Peach postharvest quality maintenance guidelines http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/pubs/

  21. Kim DM, Smith NL, Lee CY (1993) J Food Sci 58:1111–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Watada AE, Qi L (1999) Postharvest Biol Technol 15:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klein BP (1987) J Food Quality 10:179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McCarthy MA, Matthews RH (1994) Nutritional quality of fruits and vegetables subject to minimal processes. In: Wiley RC (ed) Minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 313–326

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wright KP, Kader AA (1997) Postharvest Biol Technol 10:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SK, Kader AA (2000) Postharvest Biol Technol 20:207–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gil MI, Tomás-Barreran FA, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:4976–4982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support provided by AGRO 88

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarida Moldão-Martins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steiner, A., Abreu, M., Correia, L. et al. Metabolic response to combined mild heat pre-treatments and modified atmosphere packaging on fresh-cut peach. Eur Food Res Technol 222, 217–222 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0025-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0025-y

Keywords

Navigation