Abstract
The combined influence of mild heat pre-treatments (MHPT) and two types of modified atmosphere packaging conditions on metabolic response of fresh-cut peach was monitored during a 8-day long storage under refrigeration (4^C). The quality-affecting parameters were evaluated by physical and chemical methods (solute leakage, weight loss, firmness, colour, pH and soluble solid content) and by the evaluation of physiological aspects (respiration rate, PPO and PME activity) as well as vitamins, organic acids and sugars. Regarding main acid compounds, lower levels of malic acid are evident in heat-treated samples. Succinic and citric acids did not seem to be affected by the treatments. Provitamin A (β-carotene) was not affected by MHPT. The decrease in ascorbic acid content observed along the storage period was similar for both treated and untreated samples. Significant firmness improvements were obvious after MHPT due to the activation of PME (≈25%) and the ensuing production of calcium pectates. Efficiency of the passive modified atmosphere was enough to preserve the quality attributes of fresh-cut peaches subjected to MHPT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zagory D (2000) Principles and practice of modified atmosphere packaging of horticultural commodities In: Farber JM, Dodds KL (eds) Principles of modified-atmosphere and sous vide product packaging. Technomic Publishing Co Inc, pp 174–206
Gorny JR, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (1999) J Food Sci 64:429–432
Saltveit ME (1998) Fresh-cut product biology In: Fresh-cut products: Maintaining quality and safety. US Davis conference September 12–14, 2000
Varoquaux P, Wiley RC (1997) Biological and biochemical changes in minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. In: Wiley RC (ed) Minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 226–268
Soliva-Fortuny RC, Martín-Belloso O (2003) Trends Food Sci Technol 14:341–353
Kader AA, Singh RP, Mannapperuma JD (1998) Technologies to extend the refrigerated shelf life of fresh fruits. In: Taub IA, Sing RP (ed) Food storage stability, pp 419–434
Garcia E, Barrett DM (2003) http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/pubs/
Bourne MC (1987) J Food Sci 52:667–690
Anderson A, Gekas V, Lind I, Oliveira F, Öste R (1994) Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34:229–251
Greve LC, Shackel KA, McArdle RN, Gohlke J, Labavitch JM (1994) J Agric Food Chem 42:2896–2899
Aguilar CN, Anzaldúa-Morales A, Talamás R, Gastelúm G (1997) J Food Sci 62:568–571
Abreu M, Beirão-da-Costa S, Gonçalves EM, Beirão-da-Costa ML, Moldão-Martins M (2003). Postharvest Biol Technol 30:153–160
Luna-Guzmán I, Cantwell M, Barret DM (1999) Postharvest Biol Technol 17:201–213
Coteseng MY, Lee CY (1987) J Food Sci 52:985–989
Hagerman AE, Austin PJ (1986) J Agric Food Chem 34:440–444
Medlicott AP, Thompson AK (1985) J Sci Food Agric 36:561–566
Romero-Rodriguez A, Oderiz LV, Hernandez JL, Simal Gandar J (1992) Sci Des Aliments12:593–600
Hsieh YC, Karel M (1983) J Chromatogr 259:515–518
Laurila E, Kervinen R, Ahvenainen R (1998) Postharvest News Inf 9:53–66
Crisosto CH, Kader AA (2000) Peach postharvest quality maintenance guidelines http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/pubs/
Kim DM, Smith NL, Lee CY (1993) J Food Sci 58:1111–1124
Watada AE, Qi L (1999) Postharvest Biol Technol 15:201–205
Klein BP (1987) J Food Quality 10:179–193
McCarthy MA, Matthews RH (1994) Nutritional quality of fruits and vegetables subject to minimal processes. In: Wiley RC (ed) Minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 313–326
Wright KP, Kader AA (1997) Postharvest Biol Technol 10:89–97
Lee SK, Kader AA (2000) Postharvest Biol Technol 20:207–220
Gil MI, Tomás-Barreran FA, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:4976–4982
Acknowledgements
Financial support provided by AGRO 88
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steiner, A., Abreu, M., Correia, L. et al. Metabolic response to combined mild heat pre-treatments and modified atmosphere packaging on fresh-cut peach. Eur Food Res Technol 222, 217–222 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0025-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0025-y