Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of drying methods on osmotically dehydrated cashew apples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Matured ripe cashew apples were transversely cut into 10 mm, 15 mm and 20 mm slices and immersed in sugar solutions of 52°Brix, 60°Brix and 68°Brix, for 10 h. The osmotic temperature was maintained at 27 °C in a water bath. Osmosed samples were subsequently dried in either an air-oven (50 °C) or a vacuum-drier (50 °C), both for 6 h.The instantaneous moisture content (d.b) of osmosed cashew apples decreased with increasing immersion time and osmotic solution concentration, but also increased with increasing slice thickness. The water loss, solids gain and percentage weight reduction increased with increasing osmotic solution concentration and immersion time, but decreased with increasing slice thickness. Osmotically dried samples received high acceptability. Sample pre-osmosed in 60°Brix and 68°Brix solutions were significantly better (P>0.05) than those pre-osmosed in a 51°Brix solution. A significant difference (P>0.05) between the osmo-oven and osmo-vacuum dried cashew apples could not be ascertained (under the conditions of the investigation).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3a–c.
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iyang UE, Abah UJ (1997) Plant Foods Hum Nutr 50:295–300

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akinwale TO, Aladesua OO (1999) Niger J Tree Crop Res 3:60–66

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akinwale TO (2000) Eur Food Res Technol 211:205–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sankat CK, Castaigne F Maharcy R (1996) Int J Food Sci Technol 31:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  5. Panagiotu, NN, Karathanos VT, Maroulis B (1999) Drying Technol 17:175−189

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yao, Le Maguer M (1996) Trans ASAE 39:2211–2216

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barat JME, Chiralt A, Fito P (1998) J Food Sci 63:836–840

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rastogi NK, Nwanjan K (1998) J Food Sci 63:508–511

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bolin HR, Huxsoll CC, Jackson R, NG KC (1983) J Food Sci 48:202

    Google Scholar 

  10. AOAC (1990) Official Methods Analysis, 16th edn Association Analytical Chemists, Washington

  11. Duncan DB (1955) Biometrics 11:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lerici CR Pinnavaia G Dalla Rosa M Bartolucci L (1985) J Food Sci 50:1217–1218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazarides HN, Mavroundis NE (1995) J Food Sci 60:826–828

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beristain CI, Azuara E, Cortes R, Garcia HS (1990) Int J Food Sci Technol 25:576–582

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saurel R, Raoult-Wack A, Rios G, Guilbert S (1994) Int J Food Sci Technol 29:531–539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. O. Falade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falade, K.O., Akinwale, T.O. & Adedokun, O.O. Effect of drying methods on osmotically dehydrated cashew apples. Eur Food Res Technol 216, 500–504 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0673-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0673-8

Keywords

Navigation