Abstract.
A fluorescence-based analytical method for quantification of phenolic compounds in sugar cane spirits (and other distilled alcoholic beverages) was developed. Sample preparation involved reverse-phase solid phase extraction and separation by gradient reversed-phase HPLC with fluorescence detection. Twenty-one Brazilian sugar cane spirits (aged and non-aged cachaça) were analyzed and phenol, guaiacol, o-cresol, p-/m-cresol, 3, 5-xylenol, 4-ethylphenol, 4-ethylguaiacol, 2-ethylphenol, eugenol, (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin, and scopoletin quantified. The detection limit was between 0.01 mg l–1 (eugenol and scopoletin) and 0.1 mg l–1 [(+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin]. Kaempferol and quercetin were quantified in the same spirits, together with copper and iron, using HPLC (spectrophotometric detection) and atomic absorption spectroscopy, respectively. Large variations between various spirits were noted: total phenols were between 1.5 and 70 mg l–1, flavonoids were from below detection to 3.5 mg l–1, Cu was between 0.04 and 7.0 mg l–1; and Fe between 0.01 and 0.78 mg l–1. The tendency of radical formation in the spirits was determined by electron spin resonance spectroscopy using N-t-butyl-α-phenylnitrone spin trapping, and radical scavenging capacity was determined spectrophometrically using the stable 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical as probe. Radical formation depends mainly on the Cu content, while the radical scavenging and antioxidative capacity mainly depends on the flavonoid content. (+)-Catechin and (-)-epicatechin are most important for the antioxidative capacity as confirmed in a model experiment, where oxidation was induced by iron catalysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bettin, S.M., Isique, W., Franco, D.W. et al. Phenols and metals in sugar-cane spirits. Quantitative analysis and effect on radical formation and radical scavenging. Eur Food Res Technol 215, 169–175 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-002-0517-y
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-002-0517-y