Systematic assessment of extraction of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water and sediment followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

Two solid-phase extraction methods were systematically studied to determine 32 pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water and sediments by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. One involves HLB cartridges activated with sodium dodecyl sulfate before the passage of the sample to form an ion pair with cationic analytes, and the other uses mixed HLB–cation exchange cartridges. The accuracy of the sodium dodecyl sulfate method was good for most compounds (recoveries of 61–120% with relative standard deviation less than 23%). However, the recoveries for atorvastatin, codeine, paracetamol, flufenamic acid, and salicylic acid were approximately 50% and for omeprazole and triclocarban were even lower (from 0 to 12%). The detection limits were 1.65–25 ng L-1 in water and 0.33–4.00 ng g-1 (dry weight) in sediment. The recoveries for the mixed-mode cartridge (Strata-X-CW) method ranged from 57% to 120% with relative standard deviation less than 21%, with the exception of codeine [25% (water)], metformin [11% (sediment)], paracetamol [48% (sediment)], and salicylic acid [32% (sediment)]. The detection limits were 1.65–38.35 ng L-1 in water and 0.33–10 ng g-1 (dry weight) in sediment. Both methods followed the same pattern when applied to water. For sediments, the recoveries, which offer good performance, were not very high, although 60% of the compounds had recoveries greater 80%. The methods were applied to the analysis of surface water and sediments from the Albufera Natural Park (Spain). Twenty-seven of 32 analytes were detected in the samples analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Carmona E, Picó Y. The use of chromatographic methods coupled to mass spectrometry for the study of emerging pollutants in the environment. Crit Rev Aanal Chem. 2018;48(4):305–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Miller TH, Bury NR, Owen SF, MacRae JI, Barron LP. A review of the pharmaceutical exposome in aquatic fauna. Environ Pollut. 2018;239:129–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zenker A, Cicero MR, Prestinaci F, Bottoni P, Carere M. Bioaccumulation and biomagnification potential of pharmaceuticals with a focus to the aquatic environment. J Environ Manage. 2014;133:378–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bonnefille B, Gomez E, Courant F, Escande A, Fenet H. Diclofenac in the marine environment: a review of its occurrence and effects. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;131:496–506.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Carvalho RN, Ceriani L, Ippolito A, Lettieri T. Development of the first Watch List under the Environmental Quality Standards Directive. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pavlidis G, Ploumistou E, Karasali H, Liapis K, Anagnostopoulos C, Charalampous A, et al. Evaluation of the water quality status of two surface water reservoirs in a Mediterranean island. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190(10):570.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kidd KA, Burkhard LP, Babut M, Borgå K, Muir DCG, Perceval O, et al. Practical advice for selecting or determining trophic magnification factors for application under the European Union Water Framework Directive. Integr Environ Assess. 2018;0(0).

  8. 8.

    Campo J, Lorenzo M, Pérez F, Picó Y, Farré ML, Barceló D. Analysis of the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in water, sediment and biota of the Jucar River (E Spain). Sources, partitioning and relationships with water physical characteristics. Environ Res. 2016;147:503–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Huguenot D, Bois P, Jézéquel K, Cornu J-Y, Lebeau T. Selection of low cost materials for the sorption of copper and herbicides as single or mixed compounds in increasing complexity matrices. J Hazard Mater. 2010;182(1):18–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dabrowski A, Hubicki Z, Podkościelny P, Robens E. Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method. Chemosphere. 2004;56(2):91–106.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gadd GM. Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation. Microbiology. 2010;156(3):609–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Souza-Silva ÉA, Jiang R, Rodríguez-Lafuente A, Gionfriddo E, Pawliszyn J. A critical review of the state of the art of solid-phase microextraction of complex matrices I. Environmental analysis. Trends Anal Chem. 2015;71:224–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Masiá A, Vásquez K, Campo J, Picó Y. Assessment of two extraction methods to determine pesticides in soils, sediments and sludges. Application to the Túria River Basin. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1378:19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Menya E, Olupot PW, Storz H, Lubwama M, Kiros Y. Production and performance of activated carbon from rice husks for removal of natural organic matter from water: a review. Chem Eng Res Des. 2018;129:271–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fatta-Kassinos D, Vasquez MI, Kümmerer K. Transformation products of pharmaceuticals in surface waters and wastewater formed during photolysis and advanced oxidation processes – degradation, elucidation of byproducts and assessment of their biological potency. Chemosphere. 2011;85(5):693–709.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Matilainen A, Sillanpää M. Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere. 2010;80(4):351–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Boras JA, Vaqué D, Maynou F, Sà EL, Weinbauer MG, Sala MM. Factors shaping bacterial phylogenetic and functional diversity in coastal waters of the NW Mediterranean Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2015;154:102–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Klosterhaus SL, Grace R, Hamilton MC, Yee D. Method validation and reconnaissance of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and alkylphenols in surface waters, sediments, and mussels in an urban estuary. Environ Int. 2013;54:92–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Carmona E, Andreu V, Picó Y. Multi-residue determination of 47 organic compounds in water, soil, sediment and fish—Turia River as case study. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017;146:117–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Andrés-Costa MJ, Rubio-López N, Morales Suárez-Varela M, Pico Y. Occurrence and removal of drugs of abuse in wastewater treatment plants of Valencia (Spain). Environ Pollut. 2014;194:152–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Leendert V, Van Langenhove H, Demeestere K. Trends in liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry for multi-residue analysis of organic micropollutants in aquatic environments. Trends Anal Chem. 2015;67:192–208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Siddiqui MR, AlOthman ZA, Rahman N. Analytical techniques in pharmaceutical analysis: a review. Arab J Chem. 2017;10:S1409–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chinnaiyan P, Thampi SG, Kumar M, Mini KM. Pharmaceutical products as emerging contaminant in water: relevance for developing nations and identification of critical compounds for Indian environment. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190:288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Masiá A, Campo J, Blasco C, Picó Y. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to identify contaminants in water: An insight on environmental forensics. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1345:86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vazquez-Roig P, Blasco C, Picó Y. Advances in the analysis of legal and illegal drugs in the aquatic environment. Trends Anal Chem. 2013;50:65–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Biel-Maeso M, Corada-Fernández C, Lara-Martín PA. Determining the distribution of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in soils and sediments by pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). Chemosphere. 2017;185:1001–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gerssen A, McElhinney MA, Mulder PPJ, Bire R, Hess P, de Boer J. Solid phase extraction for removal of matrix effects in lipophilic marine toxin analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;394(4):1213–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lavén M, Alsberg T, Yu Y, Adolfsson-Erici M, Sun H. Serial mixed-mode cation- and anion-exchange solid-phase extraction for separation of basic, neutral and acidic pharmaceuticals in wastewater and analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216:49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Omar TFT, Ahmad A, Aris AZ, Yusoff FM. Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in environmental matrices: review of analytical strategies for pharmaceuticals, estrogenic hormones, and alkylphenol compounds. Trends Anal Chem. 2016;85:241–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Alvarez-Muñoz D, Huerta B, Fernandez-Tejedor M, Rodríguez-Mozaz S, Barceló D. Multi-residue method for the analysis of pharmaceuticals and some of their metabolites in bivalves. Talanta. 2015;136:174–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Paíga P, Correia M, Fernandes MJ, Silva A, Carvalho M, Vieira J, et al. Assessment of 83 pharmaceuticals in WWTP influent and effluent samples by UHPLC-MS/MS: hourly variation. Sci Total Environ. 2019;648:582–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Fatoki OS, Opeolu BO, Genthe B, Olatunji OS. Multi-residue method for the determination of selected veterinary pharmaceutical residues in surface water around livestock agricultural farms. Heliyon. 2018;4:e01066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Álvarez-Ruiz R, Andrés-Costa MJ, Andreu V, Picó Y. Simultaneous determination of traditional and emerging illicit drugs in sediments, sludges and particulate matter. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1405:103–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Carmona E, Andreu V, Picó Y. Occurrence of acidic pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Turia River Basin: from waste to drinking water. Sci Total Environ. 2014;484:53–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage. 2011;92(3):407–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tandy S, Bossart K, Mueller R, Ritschel J, Hauser L, Schulin R, et al. Extraction of heavy metals from soils using biodegradable chelating agents. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(3):937–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Giebułtowicz J, Stankiewicz A, Wroczyński P, Nałęcz-Jawecki G. Occurrence of cardiovascular drugs in the sewage-impacted Vistula River and in tap water in the Warsaw region (Poland). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23:24337–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pérez-Carrera E, Hansen M, León VM, Björklund E, Krogh KA, Halling-Sørensen B, et al. Multiresidue method for the determination of 32 human and veterinary pharmaceuticals in soil and sediment by pressurized-liquid extraction and LC-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398:1173–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cirilli R, Ferretti R, Gallinella B, De Santis E, Zanitti L, La Torre F. High-performance liquid chromatography enantioseparation of proton pump inhibitors using the immobilized amylose-based Chiralpak IA chiral stationary phase in normal-phase, polar organic and reversed-phase conditions. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1177:105–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research that led to these results received funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and the European Regional Development Fund through the project WETANDPAC (RTI2018-097158-B-C31) and from the Generalitat Valenciana through the project ANTROPOCEN@ (PROMETEO/2018/155). Daniele Sadutto acknowledges the Generalitat Valenciana for his Santiago Grisolia grant: “GRISOLIAP/2018/102, Ref CPI-18-118.”.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Sadutto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 481 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadutto, D., Álvarez-Ruiz, R. & Picó, Y. Systematic assessment of extraction of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water and sediment followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 412, 113–127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02207-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pharmaceuticals and personal care products
  • Ion pairing
  • Environmental matrices
  • High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem and mass spectrometry
  • Sodium dodecyl sulfate solution
  • Solid-phase extraction