Glutaminolysis is the metabolic pathway that lyses glutamine to glutamate, alanine, citrate, aspartate, and so on. As partially recruiting reaction steps from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and the malate-aspartate shuttle, glutaminolysis takes essential place in physiological and pathological situations. We herein developed a sensitive, rapid, and reproducible liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to determine the perturbation of glutaminolysis in human plasma by quantifying 13 involved metabolites in a single 20-min run. A pHILIC column with a gradient elution system consisting of acetonitrile-5 mM ammonium acetate was used for separation, while an electrospray ionization source (ESI) operated in negative mode with multiple reaction monitoring was employed for detection. The method was fully validated according to FDA’s guidelines, and it generally provided good results in terms of linearity (the correlation coefficient no less than 0.9911 within the range of 0.05–800 μg/mL), intra- and inter-day precision (less than 18.38%) and accuracy (relative standard deviation between 89.24 and 113.4%), with lower limits of quantification between 0.05 and 10 μg/mL. The new analytical approach was successfully applied to analyze the plasma samples from 38 healthy volunteers and 34 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Based on the great sensitivity and comprehensive capacity, the targeted analysis revealed the imperceptible abnormalities in the concentrations of key intermediates, such as iso-citrate and cis-aconitate, thus allowing us to obtain a thorough understanding of glutaminolysis disorder during T2D.
Glutaminolysis LC-MS/MS Isomers Type 2 diabetes Human plasma
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors would like to thank the subjects for their participation.
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81403181), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (No. QC2016109), and the Open Project Program of the MOE Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control and Pharmacovigilance (China Pharmaceutical University) (No. DQCP2017MS02).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were following the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from the individual participants who provided the blood samples.
Durán RV, Oppliger W, Robitaille AM, Heiserich L, Skendaj R, Gottlieb E, et al. Glutaminolysis activates Rag-mTORC1 signaling. Mol Cell. 2012;47(3):349–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le A, Lane AN, Hamaker M, Bose S, Gouw A, Barbi J, et al. Glucose-independent glutamine metabolism via TCA cycling for proliferation and survival in b cells. Cell Metab. 2012;15(1):110–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman BJ, Stine ZE, Dang CV. From Krebs to clinic: glutamine metabolism to cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:619–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin L, Alesi GN, Kang S. Glutaminolysis as a target for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2015;35(28):3619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villar VH, Nguyen TL, Delcroix V, Terés S, Bouchecareilh M, Salin B, et al. mTORC1 inhibition in cancer cells protects from glutaminolysis-mediated apoptosis during nutrient limitation. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise DR, Thompson CB. Glutamine addiction: a new therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;35(8):427–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang CV. Glutaminolysis: supplying carbon or nitrogen or both for cancer cells? Cell Cycle. 2010;9(19):3884–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacque N, Ronchetti AM, Larrue C, Meunier G, Birsen R, Willems L, et al. Targeting glutaminolysis has antileukemic activity in acute myeloid leukemia and synergizes with BCL-2 inhibition. Blood. 2015;126(11):1346–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly A, Li C, Gao Z, Stanley CA, Matschinsky FM. Glutaminolysis and insulin secretion from bedside to bench and back. Diabetes. 2002;51((suppl3)(6)):S421–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu F, Tavintharan S, Sum CF, Woon K, Lim SC, Ong CN. Metabolic signature shift in type 2 diabetes mellitus revealed by mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):1060–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang AH, Sun H, Yan GL, Yuan Y, Han Y, Wang XJ. Metabolomics study of type 2 diabetes using ultra-performance LC-ESI/quadrupole-TOF high-definition MS coupled with pattern recognition methods. J Physiol Biochem. 2014;70(1):117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel D, Permentier H, Reijngoud DJ, Bischoff R. Chemical and technical challenges in the analysis of central carbon metabolites by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014;966:21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung JY, Oh MK. Isotope labeling pattern study of central carbon metabolites using GC/MS. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2015;974:101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemkov T, Hansen KC, D’Alessandro A. A three-minute method for high-throughput quantitative metabolomics and quantitative tracing experiments of central carbon and nitrogen pathways. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017;31(8):663–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hur H, Paik MJ, Xuan Y, Nguyen DT, Ham IH, Yun J, et al. Quantitative measurement of organic acids in tissues from gastric cancer patients indicates increased glucose metabolism in gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderón-Santiago M, Priego-Capote F, Galache-Osuna JG, Luque de Castro MD. Method based on GC-MS to study the influence of tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites on cardiovascular risk factors. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;74:178–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hnatyshyn S, Shipkova P. Automated and unbiased analysis of LC-MS metabolomic data. Bioanalysis. 2012;4(5):541–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Kadhi O, Melchini A, Mithen R, Saha S. Development of a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates in a range of biological matrices. J Anal Methods Chem. 2017;2017(5391832):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michopoulos F, Whalley N, Theodoridis G, Wilson ID, Dunkley TPJ, Critchlow SE. Targeted profiling of polar intracellular metabolites using ion-pair-high performance liquid chromatography and -ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry: applications to serum, urine and tissue extracts. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1349:60–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo B, Groenke K, Takors R, Wandrey C, Oldiges M. Simultaneous determination of multiple intracellular metabolites in glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1147:153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han J, Gagnon S, Eckle T, Borchers CH. Metabolomic analysis of key central carbon metabolism carboxylic acids as their 3-nitrophenylhydrazones by UPLC/ESI-MS. Electrophoresis. 2013;34(19):2891–900.Google Scholar
González O, Blanco ME, Iriarte G, Bartolomé L, Maguregui MI, Alonso RM. Bioanalytical chromatographic method validation according to current regulations, with a special focus on the non-well defined parameters limit of quantification, robustness and matrix effect. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1353:10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Fernández R, López-Martínez JC, Romero-González R, Martínez-Vidal JL, Alarcón Flores MI, Garrido Frenich A. Simple LC–MS determination of citric and malic acids in fruits and vegetables. Chromatographia. 2010;72(1–2):55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang P, Mai C, Wei Y, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zeng Z, et al. Decreased expression of the mitochondrial metabolic enzyme aconitase (ACO2) is associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Med Oncol. 2013;30(552):1–9.Google Scholar
Gumieniczek A, Komsta Ł, Chehab MR. Effects of two oral antidiabetics, pioglitazone and repaglinide, on aconitase inactivation, inflammation and oxidative/nitrosative stress in tissues under alloxan-induced hyperglycemia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;659(1):89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajad SU, Lu W, Kimball EH, Yuan J, Peterson C, Rabinowitz JD. Separation and quantitation of water soluble cellular metabolites by hydrophilic interaction chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1125(1):76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiori J, Amadesi E, Fanelli F, Tropeano CV, Rugolo M, Gotti R. Cellular and mitochondrial determination of low molecular mass organic acids by LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017;150:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar