Characterization of bonded stationary phase performance as a function of qualitative and quantitative chromatographic factors in chaotropic chromatography with risperidone and its impurities as model substances

  • Jelena Čolović
  • Milena Rmandić
  • Anđelija Malenović
Research Paper
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Numerous stationary phases have been developed with the aim to provide desired performances during chromatographic analysis of the basic solutes in their protonated form. In this work, the procedure for the characterization of bonded stationary phase performance, when both qualitative and quantitative chromatographic factors were varied in chaotropic chromatography, was proposed. Risperidone and its three impurities were selected as model substances, while acetonitrile content in the mobile phase (20–30%), the pH of the aqueous phase (3.00–5.00), the content of chaotropic agents in the aqueous phase (10–100 mM), type of chaotropic agent (NaClO4, CF3COONa), and stationary phase type (Zorbax Eclipse XDB, Zorbax Extend) were studied as chromatographic factors. The proposed procedure implies the combination of D-optimal experimental design, indirect modeling, and polynomial-modified Gaussian model, while grid point search method was selected for the final choice of the experimental conditions which lead to the best possible stationary phase performance for basic solutes. Good agreement between experimentally obtained chromatogram and simulated chromatogram for chosen experimental conditions (25% acetonitrile, 75 mM of NaClO4, pH 4.00 on Zorbax Eclipse XDB column) confirmed the applicability of the proposed procedure. The additional point was selected for the verification of proposed procedure ability to distinguish changes in solutes’ elution order. Simulated chromatogram for 21.5% acetonitrile, 85 mM of NaClO4, pH 5.00 on Zorbax Eclipse XDB column was in line with experimental data. Furthermore, the values of left and right peak half-widths obtained from indirect modeling were used in order to evaluate performances of differently modified stationary phases applying a half-width plots approach. The results from half-width plot approach as well as from the proposed procedure indicate higher efficiency and better separation performance of the stationary phase extra densely bonded and double end-capped with trimethylsilyl group than the stationary phase with the combination of end-capping and bidentate silane bonding for chromatographic analysis of basic solutes in RP–HPLC systems with chaotropic agents.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Indirect modeling Polynomial modified Gaussian model Chromatogram simulation Half-width plots approach 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for supporting this investigation through the Project 172052.

Compliance with ethical standards:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

216_2018_1122_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (151 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 151 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Di Marco VB, Bombi GG. Mathematical functions for the representation of chromatographic peaks. J Chromatogr A. 2001;931(1–2):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, García-Alvarez-Coque MC. Prediction of peak shape as a function of retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1022(1–2):17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, Ruiz-Ángel MJ, García-Álvarez-Coque MC. Prediction of peak shape in hydro-organic and micellar-organic liquid chromatography as a function of mobile phase composition. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1163(1–2):119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, Ortiz-Bolsico C, Torres-Lapasió JR, García-Álvarez-Coque MC. Approaches to model the retention and peak profile in linear gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1284:28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, Torres-Lapasió JR, García-Álvarez-Coque MC. Approaches to estimate the time and height at the peak maximum in liquid chromatography based on a modified Gaussian model. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(10):1385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li J. Comparison of the capability of peak functions in describing real chromatographic peaks. J Chromatogr A. 2002;952(1–2):63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torres-Lapasió JR, Baeza-Baeza JJ, García-Alvarez-Coque MC. A model for the description, simulation, and deconvolution of skewed chromatographic peaks. Anal Chem. 1997;69(18):3822–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Čolović J, Vemić A, Kostić N, Malenović A, Medenica M. Testing the capability of a polynomial-modified gaussian model in the description and simulation of chromatographic peaks of amlodipine and its impurity in ion-interaction chromatography. J Sep Sci. 2014;37(14):1797–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, Ruiz-Ángel MJ, García-Álvarez-Coque MC, Carda-Broch S. Half-width plots, a simple tool to predict peak shape, reveal column kinetics and characterise chromatographic columns in liquid chromatography: state of the art and new results. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1314:142–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baeza-Baeza JJ, Pous-Torres S, Torres-Lapasió JR, García-Álvarez-Coque MC. Approaches to characterise chromatographic column performance based on global parameters accounting for peak broadening and skewness. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217(14):2147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dolan JW. Column packing: what’s at the bottom of it? LC GC. 1998;16(4):350–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marszałł MP, Baczek T, Kaliszan R. Evaluation of the silanol-suppressing potency of ionic liquids. J Sep Sci. 2006;29(8):1138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vemić A, Malenović A, Medenica M. The influence of inorganic salts with chaotropic properties on the chromatographic behavior of ropinirole and its two impurities. Talanta. 2014;123:122–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pan L, LoBrutto R, Kazakevich YV, Thompson R. Influence of inorganic mobile phase additives on the retention, efficiency and peak symmetry of protonated basic compounds in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1049(1–2):63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    LoBrutto R, Jones A, Kazakevich YV, McNair HM. Effect of the eluent pH and acidic modifiers in high-performance liquid chromatography retention of basic analytes. J Chromatogr A. 2001;913(1–2):173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones A, LoBrutto R, Kazakevich Y. Effect of the counter-anion type and concentration on the liquid chromatography retention of β-blockers. J Chromatogr A. 2002;964(1–2):179–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flieger J. The effect of chaotropic mobile phase additives on the separation of selected alkaloids in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1113(1–2):37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flieger J. Effect of mobile phase composition on the retention of selected alkaloids in reversed-phase liquid chromatography with chaotropic salts. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1175(2):207–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vemić A, Rakić T, Malenović A, Medenica M. Chaotropic salts in liquid chromatographic method development for the determination of pramipexole and its impurities following quality-by-design principles. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015;102:314–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flieger J, Świeboda R. Application of chaotropic effect in reversed-phase liquid chromatography of structurally related phenothiazine and thioxanthene derivatives. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1192(2):218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maljurić N, Golubović J, Otašević B, Zečević M, Protić A. Quantitative structure–retention relationship modeling of selected antipsychotics and their impurities in green liquid chromatography using cyclodextrin mobile phases. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(10):2533–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chemicalize - Instant Cheminformatics Solutions [Internet]. [cited 2016 Dec 26]. Available from: https://chemicalize.com
  23. 23.
    Kazakevich YV, LoBrutto R. HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007. 1137 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dejaegher B, Vander Heyden Y. Experimental designs and their recent advances in set-up, data interpretation, and analytical applications. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;56(2):141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schoenmakers PJ (1986) Optimization of chromatographic selectivity. A guide to method development. By P. J. Schoenmakers. Journal of Chromatography Library, Volume 35 Elsevier, Amsterdam-Oxford-New York-Tokyo, 1986 pp. XV + 345, $ 84.00. Elsevier Amst [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 26;(1st ed). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhrc.1240110137/abstract
  26. 26.
    Dewé W, Marini RD, Chiap P, Hubert P, Crommen J, Boulanger B. Development of response models for optimising HPLC methods. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2004;74(2):263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klein EJ, Rivera SL. A review of criteria functions and response surface methodology for the optimization of analytical scale Hplc separations. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2000;23(14):2097–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Crowther JB. In: Ahuja S, Scypinski S, editors. Handbook of modern pharmaceutical analysis. New York: Academic; 2001. p. 415–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rimmer CA, Sander LC, Wise SA. Selectivity of long chain stationary phases in reversed phase liquid chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;382(3):698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bocian S, Nowaczyk A, Buszewski B. New alkyl-phosphate bonded stationary phases for liquid chromatographic separation of biologically active compounds. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;404(3):731–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Courtois C, Pagès G, Caldarelli S, Delaurent C. Cholesteric bonded stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography: a comparative study of the chromatographic behavior. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;392(3):451–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pous-Torres S, Torres-Lapasió JR, García-Álvarez-Coque MC. Comparison of the performance of Chromolith performance RP-18e, 1.8-μm Zorbax eclipse XDB-C18 and XTerra MS C18, based on modelling approaches. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405(7):2219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jelena Čolović
    • 1
  • Milena Rmandić
    • 1
  • Anđelija Malenović
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Drug AnalysisUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations