Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 7, pp 2011–2018 | Cite as

Simultaneous quantification of endogenous and exogenous plasma glucose by isotope dilution LC-MS/MS with indirect MRM of the derivative tag

  • Lingling Yu
  • Chao Wen
  • Xing Li
  • Shiqi Fang
  • Lichuan Yang
  • Tony Wang
  • Kaifeng Hu
Research Paper

Abstract

Quantification of endogenous and exogenous plasma glucose can help more comprehensively evaluate the glucose metabolic status. A ratio-based approach using isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) with indirect multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of the derivative tag was developed to simultaneously quantify endo-/exogenous plasma glucose. Using diluted D-[13C6] glucose as tracer of exogenous glucose, 12C6/13C6 glucoses were first derivatized and then data were acquired in MRM mode. The metabolism of exogenous glucose can be tracked and the concentration ratio of endo/exo-genous glucose can be measured by calculating the endo-/exo-genous glucose concentrations from peak area ratio of specific daughter ions. Joint application of selective derivatization and MRM analysis not only improves the sensitivity but also minimizes the interference from the background of plasma, which warrants the accuracy and reproducibility. Good agreement between the theoretical and calculated concentration ratios was obtained with a linear correlation coefficient (R) of 0.9969 in the range of D-glucose from 0.5 to 20.0 mM, which covers the healthy and diabetic physiological scenarios. Satisfactory reproducibility was obtained by evaluation of the intra- and inter-day precisions with relative standard deviations (RSDs) less than 5.16%, and relative recoveries of 85.96 to 95.92% were obtained at low, medium, and high concentration, respectively. The method was successfully applied to simultaneous determination of the endo-/exogenous glucose concentration in plasma of non-diabetic and type II diabetic cynomolgus monkeys.

Graphical Abstract

The scheme of the proposed ratio-based approach using isotope dilution LC-MS/MS with indirect MRM of the derivative tag for simultaneous quantification of endogenous and exogenous plasma glucose.

Keywords

Derivatization Diabetes Endogenous glucose Exogenous glucose LC-MS/MS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National key R & D program of China (No. 2017YFC0906900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21505142), and Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (No. 2012HA015).

Compliance with ethical standards

All protocols of animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Kunming Biomed International.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2018_872_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (244 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 243 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ross SA, Gulve EA, Wang MH. Chemistry and biochemistry of type 2 diabetes. Chem Rev. 2004;104(3):1255–82.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0204653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu P, Sun WW, Zhang CL, Song ZY, Lin S. The role of neuropeptide Y in the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol. 2016;220:235–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balaji V, Balaji M, Anjalakshi C, Cynthia A, Arthi T, Seshiah V. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asian-Indian women. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;15(3):187–90.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.83403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ogawa Z, Kanashima M, Nishioka H. Improvement of the quantitative method for glucose determination using hexokinase and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2001;39(5):396–400.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2001.063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carey AL, Steinberg GR, Macaulay SL, Thomas WG, Holmes AG, Ramm G, et al. Interleukin-6 increases insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in humans and glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation in vitro via AMP-activated protein kinase. Diabetes. 2006;55(10):2688–97.  https://doi.org/10.2337/db05-1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tripathy D, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Groop L. Contribution of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and basal hepatic insulin sensitivity to surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(9):2204–10.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.9.2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Defronzo RA, Gunnarsson R, Bjorkman O, Olsson M, Wahren J. Effects of insulin on peripheral and splanchnic glucose-metabolism in noninsulin-dependent (type-II) diabetes-mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1985;76(1):149–55.  https://doi.org/10.1172/jci111938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antonopoulos A, Bonnet P, Botek E, Debrun JL, Hakim B, Herbreteau B, et al. Study of the attachment of Na+ on glucose and on some of its methylated derivatives. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003;17(2):122–5.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McIntosh TS, Davis HM, Matthews DE. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method to measure stable isotopic tracer enrichments of glycerol and glucose in human serum. Anal Biochem. 2002;300(2):163–9.  https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.2001.5455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wan ECH, Yu JZ. Determination of sugar compounds in atmospheric aerosols by liquid chromatography combined with positive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1107(1–2):175–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogatsky E, Jayatillake H, Goswami G, Tomuta V, Stein D. Sensitive LC MS quantitative analysis of carbohydrates by CS+ attachment. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2005;16(11):1805–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2005.07.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kato Y, Numajiri Y. Chloride attachment negative-ion mass spectra of sugars by combined liquid-chromatography and atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr Biomed Appl. 1991;562(1–2):81–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(91)80567-v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogatsky E, Tomuta V, Stein DT. LC/MS quantitative study of glucose by iodine attachment. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;591(2):155–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rijke ED, Bouter N, Ruisch BJ, Haiber S, Konig T. Identification of N-gluconyl ethanolamine in wine by negative electrospray ionization with post-column chloride attachment and accurate mass determination on a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1156:296–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wan ECH, Yu JZ. Analysis of sugars and sugar polyols in atmospheric aerosols by chloride attachment in liquid chromatography/negative ion electrospray mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(7):2459–66.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es062390g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Macasek F, Bruder P, Patakyova A, Buriova E. Atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization mass spectra of glucose and 2-fluorodeoxyglucose for quantitative analysis of 2-fluorodeoxyglucose by high-performance liquid chromatography. Eur J Mass Spectrom. 2003;9(2):129–37.  https://doi.org/10.1255/ejms.529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clapperton AT, Coward WA, Bluck LJC. Measurement of insulin sensitivity indices using 13C-glucose and gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2002;16(21):2009–14.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bluck LJC, Clapperton AT, Coward WA. 13C- and 2H-labelled glucose compared for minimal model estimates of glucose metabolism in man. Clin Sci. 2005;109(6):513–21.  https://doi.org/10.1042/Cs20050155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schierbeek H, Moerdijk-Poortvliet TCW, van den Akker CHP, te Braake FWJ, Boschker HTS, van Goudoever JB. Analysis of [U-13C6] glucose in human plasma using liquid chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry compared with two other mass spectrometry techniques. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009;23(23):3824–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gonzalez-Antuna A, Dominguez-Romero JC, Garcia-Reyes JF, Rodriguez-Gonzalez P, Centineo G, Alonso JIG, et al. Overcoming matrix effects in electrospray: quantitation of beta-agonists in complex matrices by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using singly 13C-labeled analogues. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1288:40–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.02.074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang TJ, Zhang CB, Zhao HJ, Zeng J, Zhang JT, Zhou WY, et al. Determination of serum glucose by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: a candidate reference measurement procedure. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(26):7403–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9817-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andersen KE, Bjergegaard C, Sorensen H. Analysis of reducing carbohydrates by reductive tryptamine derivatization prior to micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(25):7234–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030329e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guigo N, Mazeau K, Putaux JL, Heux L. Surface modification of cellulose microfibrils by periodate oxidation and subsequent reductive amination with benzylamine: a topochemical study. Cellulose. 2014;21(6):4119–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0459-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hurtado-Sanchez MD, Espinosa-Mansilla A, Duran-Meras I. Influence of the presence of natural monosaccharides in the quantification of alpha-dicarbonyl compounds in high content sugar samples. A comparative study by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-single quadrupole mass spectrometry using different derivatization reactions. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1422:117–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gensberger-Reigl S, Huppert J, Pischetsrieder M. Quantification of reactive carbonyl compounds in icodextrin-based peritoneal dialysis fluids by combined UHPLC-DAD and -MS/MS detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016;118:132–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.10.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dalpathado DS, Jiang H, Kater MA, Desaire H. Reductive amination of carbohydrates using NaBH(OAC)3. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;381(6):1130–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-3028-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poulter L, Burlingame AL. Desorption mass-spectrometry of oligosaccharides coupled with hydrophobic chromophores. Methods Enzymol. 1990;193:661–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)93444-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang HY, Stevens RD, Young SP, Surwit R, Georgiades A, Boston R, et al. A convenient LC-MS method for assessment of glucose kinetics in vivo with D-[13C6] glucose as a tracer. Clin Chem. 2009;55(3):527–32.  https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.113654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hewavitharana AK. Matrix matching in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with stable isotope labelled internal standards—is it necessary? J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(2):359–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.11.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pfeiffer CM, Fazili Z, McCoy L, Zhang M, Gunter EW. Determination of folate vitamers in human serum by stable-isotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry and comparison with radioassay and microbiologic assay. Clin Chem. 2004;50(2):423–32.  https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2003.026955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Basu R, Chandramouli V, Dicke B, Landau B, Rizza R. Obesity and type 2 diabetes impair insulin-induced suppression of glycogenolysis as well as gluconeogenesis. Diabetes. 2005;54(7):1942–8.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.7.1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
  2. 2.School of Chemical Science and TechnologyYunnan UniversityKunmingChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Kunming Biomed InternationalKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations