Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 409, Issue 27, pp 6451–6462 | Cite as

Thermodynamics and molecular insight in guest–host complexes of fluoroquinolones with β-cyclodextrin derivatives, as revealed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and molecular modeling experiments

  • Irina M. Le-Deygen
  • Anna A. Skuredina
  • Igor V. Uporov
  • Elena V. Kudryashova
Research Paper


β-Сyclodextrin (CD) is a perspective class of excipients used in pharmaceutical formulations to enhance solubility, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics of various poorly soluble drugs, forming a non-covalent guest–host complex. However, the development of such formulations is usually a very laborious and time-consuming process due to lack of appropriate analytical tools to directly track and study the detailed molecular mechanism of such complex formation. Here, using guest–host complexes of fluoroquinolones (FQ) with CDs, as an example, we demonstrate the utility of ATR-FTIR to determine the thermodynamic stability, as well as structural features associated with complex formation, including involvement of certain functional groups. Furthermore, varying the CD’s side groups, we were able to tailor the CD’s geometry and binding surface to make FQ–CD interactions strong enough to potentially affect its pharmacokinetics and justify development of a new sustained-release drug formulation (dissociation constant decreased from 5 * 10−3 M to 10−5 M). 3D molecular modeling with energy optimization supports the findings and conclusions made on the basis of ATR-FTIR data analysis and explains the observed difference in dissociation constants.


Fluoroquinolones β-Cyclodextrin Guest–host complexes ATR-FTIR spectroscopy 















Sulphobutyl ether β-cyclodextrin





This research is supported by RSF 15-13-00063. The authors thank Dr. Vinogradov A.A. for his comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and fruitful discussions and Dr. Putilin S.N. (Bruker AXS GmbH) for the help in X-ray experiments.

Author contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2017_590_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (160 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 159 kb)


  1. 1.
    Rubinstein E. History of quinolones and their side effects. Chemotherapy. 2001;47(suppl 3):3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad Z, Pandey R, Sharma S, Khuller GK. Novel chemotherapy for tuberculosis: chemotherapeutic potential of econazole- and moxifloxacin-loaded PLG nanoparticles. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31(2):142–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang J, Ma PX. Cyclodextrin-based supramolecular systems for drug delivery: recent progress and future perspective. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(9):1215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Misiuk W, Jozefowicz M. Study on a host–guest interaction of hydroxypropyl-Β-cyclodextrin with ofloxacin. J Mol Liq. 2015;202:101–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drevenšek P, Košmrlj J, Giester G, Skauge T, Slette E, Sepčić K, et al. X-ray crystallographic, NMR and antimicrobial activity studies of magnesium complexes of fluoroquinolones—racemic ofloxacin and its S-form. Levofloxacin J Inorg Biochem. 2006;100(11):1755–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elbashir AA, Dsugi NFA, Aboul-Enein HY. Supramolecular study on the interaction between ofloxacin and methyl Β-cyclodextrin by fluorescence spectroscopy and its analytical application. J Fluoresc. 2014;24:355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mamian-Lopez MB, Poppi RJ. Quantification of moxifloxacin in urine using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) and multivariate curve resolution on a nanostructured gold surface. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405(24):7671–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sousa J, Alves G, Fortuna A, Falcão A. Analytical methods for determination of new fluoroquinolones in biological matrices and pharmaceutical formulations by liquid chromatography: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403(1):93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deygen IM, Kudryashova EV. New versatile approach for analysis of PEG content in conjugates and complexes with biomacromolecules based on FTIR spectroscopy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;141:36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deygen IM, Egorov AM, Kudryashova EV. Structure and stability of Fluoroquinolone-(2-hydroxypropyl)-Β-cyclodextrin complexes as perspective antituberculosis drugs. Mosc Univ Chem Bull. 2016;71(1):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kudryashova EV, Deygen IM, Sukhoverkov KV, Filatova LY, Klyachko NL, Vorobei AM, et al. Micronization of levofloxacin by supercritical antisolvent precipitation. Russ J Phys Chem B. 2016;10(4):52–66.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kudryashova EV, Sukhoverkov KV, Deygen IM, Vorobey AM, Pokrovskiy OI, Parenago OO, et al. Influence of parameters of moxifloxacin micronization by anti-solvent precipitation on its physic-chemical properties. Supercrit Fluids Theory Pract. 2016;11(3):71–85.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hendy GM, Breslin CB. A spectrophotometric and NMR study on the formation of an inclusion complex between dopamine and a sulphonated cyclodextrin host. J Electroanal Chem. 2011;661(1):179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gunasekaran S, Rajalakshmi K, Kumaresan S. Vibrational analysis, electronic structure and nonlinear optical properties of levofloxacin by density functional theory. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2013;112:351–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goyne KW, Chorover J, Kubicki JD, Zimmerman AR, Brantley SL. Sorption of the antibiotic ofloxacin to mesoporous and nonporous alumina and silica. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;283(1):160–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pandey S, Pandey P, Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Rai AK. FTIR spectroscopy: a tool for quatitative analysis of ciprofloxacin in tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(4):359–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sahoo S, Chakraborti CK, Mishra SC, Naik S, Nanda UN. FTIR and Raman spectroscopy as a tool for analyzing sustained release hydrogel of ciprofloxacin/carbopol polymer. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2011;2(2):268–77.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tomren MA, Másson M, Loftsson T, Tønnesen HH. Studies on curcumin and curcuminoids. XXXI. Symmetric and asymmetric curcuminoids: stability, activity and complexation with cyclodextrin. Int J Pharm. 2007;338(1–2):27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saenger W. Cyclodextrin inclusion compounds in research and industry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1980;19(5):344–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stella VJ, He Q. Cyclodextrins. Toxicol Pathol. 2008;36(1):30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jelić R, Tomović M, Stojanović S, Joksović L, Jakovljević I, Djurdjević P. Study of inclusion complex of β-cyclodextrin and levofloxacin and its effect on the solution equilibria between gadolinium(III) ion and levofloxacin. Monatshefte für Chemie - Chem Mon. 2015;146(10):1621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dsugi NFA, Elbashir AA. Supramolecular interaction of moxifloxacin and β-cyclodextrin spectroscopic characterization and analytical application. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2016;137:804–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jambhekar SS, Breen P. Cyclodextrins in pharmaceutical formulations II: solubilization, binding constant, and complexation efficiency. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21(2):363–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tóth G, Mohácsi R, Rácz A, Rusu A, Horváth P, Szente L, et al. Equilibrium and structural characterization of ofloxacin–cyclodextrin complexation. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem. 2013;77(1):291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bandi N, Wei W, Roberts CB, Kotra LP, Kompella UB. Preparation of budesonide– and indomethacin–hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPBCD) complexes using a single-step, organic-solvent-free supercritical fluid process. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;23:159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zu S, Yang L, Huang J, Ma C, Wang W, Zhao C, et al. Micronization of taxifolin by supercritical antisolvent process and evaluation of radical scavenging activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(7):8869–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations