Skip to main content
Log in

Gas-diffusion microextraction coupled with spectrophotometry for the determination of formaldehyde in cork agglomerates

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a simple methodology was developed for the extraction and determination of free formaldehyde content in cork agglomerate samples. For the first time, gas-diffusion microextraction was used for the extraction of volatile formaldehyde directly from samples, with simultaneous derivatization with acetylacetone (Hantzsch reaction). The absorbance of the coloured solution was read in a spectrophotometer at 412 nm. Different extraction parameters were studied and optimized (extraction temperature, sample mass, volume of acceptor solution, extraction time and concentration of derivatization reagent) by means of an asymmetric screening. The developed methodology proved to be a reliable tool for the determination of formaldehyde in cork agglomerates with the following suitable method features: low LOD (0.14 mg kg-1) and LOQ (0.47 mg kg-1), r 2 = 0.9994, and intraday and interday precision of 3.5 and 4.9%, respectively. The developed methodology was applied to the determination of formaldehyde in different cork agglomerate samples, and contents between 1.9 and 9.4 mg kg−1 were found. Furthermore, formaldehyde was also determined by the standard method EN 717-3 for comparison purposes; no significant differences between the results of both methods were observed.

Representation of the GDME system and its main components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salthammer T. The formaldehyde dilemma. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015;218(4):433–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wittmann O. The subsequent dissociation of formaldehyde from particle board. Holz Roh Werkst. 1962;20(6):221–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Air quality guidelines for Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 88. Lyon: World Health Organization; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Binetti R, Costamagna FM, Marcello I. Development of carcinogenicity classifications and evaluations: the case of formaldehyde. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2006;42(2):132–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trapp D, Cooke KM, Fischer H, Bonsang B, Zitzelsberger RU, Seuwen R, et al. Isoprene and its degradation products methyl vinyl ketone, methacrolein and formaldehyde in a eucalyptus forest during the FIELDVOC’94 campaign in Portugal. Chemosphere Global Change Sci. 2001;3(3):295–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salem MZM, Böhm M. Understanding of formaldehyde emissions from solid wood: an overview. BioResources. 2013;8(3):4775–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Na K, Cocker DR. Fine organic particle, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde concentrations under and after the influence of fire activity in the atmosphere of Riverside, California. Environ Res. 2008;108(1):7–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duan J, Tan J, Yang L, Wu S, Hao J. Concentration, sources and ozone formation potential of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during ozone episode in Beijing. Atmos Res. 2008;88(1):25–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elbert AA. Influence of hardener systems and wood on the formaldehyde emission from urea-formaldehyde resin and particleboards. Holzforschung. 1995;49(4):358–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Salthammer T, Mentese S, Marutzky R. Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chem Rev. 2010;110(4):2536–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barro R, Regueiro J, Llompart M, Garcia-Jares C. Analysis of industrial contaminants in indoor air: part 1. Volatile organic compounds, carbonyl compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216(3):540–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. EN 717-1. Wood-based panels—determination of formaldehyde release—part 1: formaldehyde emission by the chamber method. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Risholm-Sundman M, Larsen A, Vestin E, Weibull A. Formaldehyde emission—comparison of different standard methods. Atmos Environ. 2007;41(15):3193–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. EN 717-2. Wood-based panels—determination of formaldehyde release—part 2: formaldehyde release by the gas analysis method. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. EN 120. Wood-based panels—determination of formaldehyde content—extraction method called the perforator method. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. EN 717-3. Wood-based panels—determination of formaldehyde release—part 3: formaldehyde release by the flask method. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. JIS A 1460, 2001. Building boards. Determination of formaldehyde emission—desiccator method. Japanese Industrial Standard; 2001.

  20. Himmel S, Mai C, Schumann A, Hasener J, Steckel V, Lenth C. Determination of formaldehyde release from wood-based panels using SPME-GC-FAIMS. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom. 2014;17(2):55–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pacheco JG, Valente IM, Gonçalves LM, Rodrigues JA, Barros AA. Gas-diffusion microextraction. J Sep Sci. 2010;33(20):3207–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodrigues JA, Gonçalves LM, Pacheco JG, Barros AA, inventors. Módulo extractor e processo de extracção de espécies voláteis e semi-voláteis baseado em difusão gasosa. PT Patent 104789; 2011.

  23. Ramos RM, Gonçalves LM, Vyskočil V, Rodrigues JA. Free sulphite determination in wine using screen-printed carbon electrodes with prior gas-diffusion microextraction. Electrochem Commun. 2016;63:52–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gonçalves LM, Magalhaes PJ, Valente IM, Pacheco JG, Dostalek P, Sykora D, et al. Analysis of aldehydes in beer by gas-diffusion microextraction: characterization by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode-array detection-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217(24):3717–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramos RM, Pacheco JG, Gonçalves LM, Valente IM, Rodrigues JA, Barros AA. Determination of free and total diacetyl in wine by HPLC-UV using gas-diffusion microextraction and pre-column derivatization. Food Control. 2012;24(1–2):220–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Valente IM, Santos CM, Gonçalves LM, Rodrigues JA, Barros AA. Application of gas-diffusion microextraction for high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of aliphatic amines in fermented beverages. Anal Methods. 2012;4(8):2569–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferreira RC, Ramos RM, Gonçalves LM, Almeida PJ, Rodrigues JA. Application of gas-diffusion microextraction to solid samples using the chromatographic determination of α-diketones in bread as a case study. Analyst. 2015;140(10):3648–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nash T. The colorimetric estimation of formaldehyde by means of the Hantzsch reaction. Biochem J. 1953;55(3):416–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sawicki E, Carnes RA. Spectrophotofluorimetric determination of aldehydes with dimedone and other reagents. Mikrochim Acta. 1968;56(1):148–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Murata K, Watanabe Y, Nakano T. Effect of thermal treatment of veneer on formaldehyde emission of poplar plywood. Materials. 2013;6(2):410–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gil L, Maurício N, Cáceres G. Study of formaldehyde determination in cork products. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 2000;58(1–2):47–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Que Z, Furuno T, Katoh S, Nishino Y. Evaluation of three test methods in determination of formaldehyde emission from particleboard bonded with different mole ratio in the urea-formaldehyde resin. Build Environ. 2007;42(3):1242–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cerqueira M, Gomes L, Tarelho L, Pio C. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde emissions from residential wood combustion in Portugal. Atmos Environ. 2013;72:171–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gil L, Maurício N, Cáceres G. Study of formaldehyde determination in cork products. Holz Roh Werkst. 2000;58(1–2):47–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. EN 322. Particleboards. Specifications. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Salthammer T. Photophysical properties of 3,5-diacetyl-1,4-dihydrolutidine in solution: application to the analysis of formaldehyde. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 1993;74(2):195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lewis GA, Mathieu D, Phan-Tan-Luu R. Pharmaceutical experimental design. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Addelman S. Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments. Technometrics. 1962;4(1):21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mathieu D, Nony J, Phan-Tan-Luu R. NemrodW®, version 2011, LPRAI, Marseille.

  40. Miller JN, Miller JC. Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry, 6th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited; 2010.

  41. Tohmura S-i, Inoue A, Sahari S. Influence of the melamine content in melamine-urea-formaldehyde resins on formaldehyde emission and cured resin structure. J Wood Sci. 2001;47(6):451–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Dunky M. Urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesive resins for wood. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1998;18(2):95–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Project AGL-2014-53647-R) and FEDER and with financial support from FCT/MEC through national funds and co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020 - UID/QUI/50006/2013 - POCI/01/0145/FEDER/007265, which includes a studentship to PFB. RMR (SFRH/BD/88166/2012) wishes to acknowledge FCT for his PhD studentship. IMV (SFRH/BPD/111181/2015) wishes to acknowledge FCT for her post-doctoral grant funded by the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science and by the European Social Fund within the 2014–2020 Strategic Framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui M. Ramos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brandão, P.F., Ramos, R.M., Valente, I.M. et al. Gas-diffusion microextraction coupled with spectrophotometry for the determination of formaldehyde in cork agglomerates. Anal Bioanal Chem 409, 2885–2892 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0233-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0233-x

Keywords

Navigation