Optimization of LC-Orbitrap-HRMS acquisition and MZmine 2 data processing for nontarget screening of environmental samples using design of experiments
- 1k Downloads
Liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) is a well-established technique for nontarget screening of contaminants in complex environmental samples. Automatic peak detection is essential, but its performance has only rarely been assessed and optimized so far. With the aim to fill this gap, we used pristine water extracts spiked with 78 contaminants as a test case to evaluate and optimize chromatogram and spectral data processing. To assess whether data acquisition strategies have a significant impact on peak detection, three values of MS cycle time (CT) of an LTQ Orbitrap instrument were tested. Furthermore, the key parameter settings of the data processing software MZmine 2 were optimized to detect the maximum number of target peaks from the samples by the design of experiments (DoE) approach and compared to a manual evaluation. The results indicate that short CT significantly improves the quality of automatic peak detection, which means that full scan acquisition without additional MS2 experiments is suggested for nontarget screening. MZmine 2 detected 75–100 % of the peaks compared to manual peak detection at an intensity level of 105 in a validation dataset on both spiked and real water samples under optimal parameter settings. Finally, we provide an optimization workflow of MZmine 2 for LC-HRMS data processing that is applicable for environmental samples for nontarget screening. The results also show that the DoE approach is useful and effort-saving for optimizing data processing parameters.
KeywordsLTQ Orbitrap Design of experiments Environmental chemistry MZmine 2 LC-HRMS Cycle time
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support by the European Marie Curie Initial Training Network EDA-EMERGE (grant agreement no. 290100), the European FP7 Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS (grant agreement no. 603437). MH was support by EDA-EMERGE (ESR09) and the HIGRADE Graduate School of the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 14.Schymanski EL, Singer HP, Slobodnik J, Ipolyi IM, Oswald P, Krauss M, et al. Non-target screening with high-resolution mass spectrometry: critical review using a collaborative trial on water analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;1–19.Google Scholar
- 16.Hecht ES, Oberg AL, Muddiman DC. Optimizing mass spectrometry analyses: a tailored review on the utility of design of experiments. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2016;1–19.Google Scholar
- 17.Livingstone D. Data analysis for chemists. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 22.Zhou Y, Song J-Z, Choi FF-K, Wu H-F, Qiao C-F, Ding L-S, et al. An experimental design approach using response surface techniques to obtain optimal liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry conditions to determine the alkaloids in Meconopsi species. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216(42):7013–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.MZmine Development Team. MZmine 2.10 manual. 2005–2012.Google Scholar
- 30.Lenth RV. rsm. 2.07 ed, 2014.Google Scholar